ADVERTISEMENT

Waiting For UConn To Make A Statement

The exit fees arent high enough. Anyway, I tend to think UConn basketball is going to suffer from this move, just as Syracuse, Louisville, et al. did when they joined the ACC.

However, if a couple of superconferences break with the NCAA, then the college basketball landscape will be radically altered and potentially destroyed forever. If UConn still stinks at football upon entering the Big 12, then they could once again be left out of the new superconferences.
Hope so.
  • Like
Reactions: Burnsly

Waiting For UConn To Make A Statement

Someone sent me this link along the lines of Uconn's importance to the league (Big East 2024 TV ratings across each game): https://lookerstudio.google.com/u/0/reporting/9815f157-ea60-478f-a481-2dc93fae6ca8/page/tWDGB.

I don't know how to digest all these numbers or what they mean in the grand scheme, but a few takeaways:

-Uconn was first in TV viewership by several million (17.3 million). Marquette the only other team that was close with approx. 15 million. After that you have Creighton, St. John's and Nova all in the 10m viewership range, in that order. No on else close to that 10 million mark in TV viewership, including us, Gtown, Providence etc. So there was a real drop off once you got past Uconn (king of the hill), Marquette, Creighton, St. John's and Nova.

-No coincidence, the common thread among the top 10 most watched games is either Uconn, Marquette or St. John's.

- The top 5 rated Fox games were the two times Uconn played Marquette and the 3 times they played St John's.

-Uconn is basically at the top of every most watched FS1, Fox and CBS game

- Our game v. Uconn was the second most watched Big East-related game on CBS, trailing only Uconn v. North Carolina, and slightly ahead of Creighton v. St. John's on CBS.
  • Like
Reactions: CL82

Healthcare costs rising

Here are a couple articles for you about Republicans coming after Michelle Obama.


You act like the Obama's gave into conservatives. If they did there wouldn't have been the Affordable Care Act. Since neither one of us were in the room, let's take our best guesses. The Obama's gave into conservatives or lobbyists?

The first article says she should practice what she preaches. Not saying it was a bad idea but don't be dining on ribs and mandating I need to eat berries. Very similar to Newsome going to out eat during covid, while his state is locked down. The second article you link the hit is on what it would costs and even says if it gets passed by the Republican House, it would probably fail with the Democratic Senate. She said we need to fight Congress, not the Republicans and not the Democrats. Then she stopped fighting. I wonder why? I think the links I posted answer why.

Harris

Adam Kinzinger was very good on how he explained how trump is not a real Republican nor a true conservative . On Fox they did not even show the speech but rather had talking heads babbling about something else. Did not mention his speech at all AND how about trump saying last night he would cut all energy costs in half including gas . Wow what is he drinking or smoking . The more he talks the more he buries himself. Who is advising him Hannibal Lecter.
No, Dr. Lecter is Biden's personal physician. Kinzinger should tell us something we don't know; even if a true Republican/conservative was running, you'd still be killing them.

Healthcare costs rising



Ok Hillary it was a vast right wing conspiracy. Nobody was taking away freedoms just an attempt to add transparency. Eat what you want but companies be transparent of what you’re eating.
Here are a couple articles for you about Republicans coming after Michelle Obama.


Crooked Ben Sasse

This is great reporting. Wow, another "conservative" who turns out to be anything but. I'm shocked.

Another feather in the cap of Florida governor Ron DeSantis for offering the job to Sasse after a job search that he personally ensured would have little to no transparency. Sounds like the defiling of the state institution went precisely to the plan.


But, hey, it's not "Red Team" versus "Blue Team." Right?

Waiting For UConn To Make A Statement

CL82,

Assuming it plays out per the article, how does UConn sustain massive deficits for the next 7 years and maintain football facilities? What will its brand be after another 7 years of irrelevance or worse. Once it plays football in the B12, how can it fund $22mm per year for NIL? How long after 2031 will it earn a full payout. This can’t be a good financial deal for the University or State. Thanks
Football's current deficit is about 14 million. The Connecticut governor has indicated his support for both the football program and the university. I believe that Connecticut currently has a budget surplus so the money is there. They've committed to $100 million in renovations to Gampel, 125 million, I think, in renovations to the XL center, and additionally are planning 175 million in renovations to Rentschler field. That's 400 million right there. I don't think the annual $14 million football deficit is particularly daunting to them.
I just do not get them thinking they can be a big time football program . Their problem is that they invested big money in the program and they are stuck with it . Instead of eating their losses they are continuing to put good money into a bad product hoping that going into a football conference will help build their program. They will take the money and run . Good luck with that. Remember when anybody says it's not about the money IT ALWAYS IS !!!
Like it or not, and I don't particularly like it, football is where the money is. UConn's most recent athletic department deficit is $35 million, if I recall correctly. A full share in the big 12 would pay it off so we would essentially be breakeven. Of course that doesn't take into account the additional travel cost, which been estimated at about 2 million a year and other additional costs of membership in that conference. Of course it also doesn't take into account that a full share of college football playoff money is an additional $15 million.

At this point, especially given the considerable amount of money Connecticut has already invested in football, it would be dumb not to chase full membership in a P4 conference.

Again, because I'm a basketball first fan, I don't love it, but not loving it doesn't mean I don't recognize that, for the time being, the future of college athletics is closely linked to big-time football.
The taxpayer Put
Yep. Without the taxpayers footing the bill, there's no way we could compete at this level. Since I'm a New Jersey resident, I don't pay it, but, on the other hand, both of us paid to subsidize Rutgers.

It is what it is.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT