?
- Thread starter 49ers10
- Start date
My neighbor is a Special Agent working for the FBI and last year was assigned as member of a Special Detail protecting Hillary. He could not go in great detail however, some of the stories he could tell me were hard to believe. Let's just say she looks down on everyone and truly considers herself and her husband(?) above the law. IMO, there is always the Clinton's sitting on the fence of what is legal or, illegal.
Yes, it is quite obvious to me and others that she is not the type of person to lead our country, let alone Commandeer- in-Chief.
Unfortunately, our other options are not great however, Hillary is our worse option.
Yes, it is quite obvious to me and others that she is not the type of person to lead our country, let alone Commandeer- in-Chief.
Unfortunately, our other options are not great however, Hillary is our worse option.
Last edited:
Of course, freedom of speech unless I don't agree with you. Then it's time to censor. OWS mantra.
I don't like Clinton at all, but you are basically describing politicians. Those traits are not unique to the Clinton's. If you can't support someone because they think they are above the law, you should never vote.
I really don't see how anyone can be passionate in their support of either of the candidates. Hillary is bad... but Trump has the possibility to be an "oh my god, what have we done!" type of president.
WOW, that's really odd. Who would believe that a politician (any politician) would ever lie. I'm shocked.
Tom K
There is nothing wrong with a wall to protect a border.
Using language to promote hatred towards the people on the other side of that wall (and those who are already here) is a problem.
Agreed but he gets vilified separately for both while Clinton gets a pass from this issue.
Because of tone. There is a huge difference.
Trump's tone is that he wants to build a wall to prevent the Mexican criminals from coming in, and has built his campaign around this point.
Hillary's tone is that she want to build a wall to control the border and it is an incredibly minor part of her campaign.
Are you saying an FBI agent witnessed Hillary committing crimes? Hmm, he can't be much of an FBI agent if he did nothing about it. Btw, isn't the Secret Service tasked to protect The presidential families?
We are really not voting for a president given the choices. What we are really voting for, in my opinion, is the appointment to the Supreme court. Do you want a liberal or a conservative Justice? I'll base my vote on that.
TK... I get your point... but your comment does give the impression that you are stifling discussion not encouraging it.... about at least the point 49'ers was making
The bottom-line is as The FBI Director pointed out Hillary was "extremely careless" in handling her emails. This is no where near the most serious charge. Would you want someone who was "extremely careless" with confidential emails with the highest security clearances running your country?