Looks like FDA will recommend booster eight months after second Pfizer/Moderna shots. Not required yet for J&J vaccine yet. Perhaps it holds up longer; perhaps not, but a good example of why you need to look at efficacy data over time.
Looks like FDA will recommend booster eight months after second Pfizer/Moderna shots. Not required yet for J&J vaccine yet. Perhaps it holds up longer; perhaps not, but a good example of why you need to look at efficacy data over time.
Exactly. It’s not only efficacy at time of dosing, but over time as well. Normally this would be captured during the phase 3 clinical trials.Yea, would certainly be nice if we had more time.
I believe Pfizer and Moderna were both a couple months ahead of J&J with their trials and their approvals, so would make sense we have more data on when/if a booster would be needed.
One study I saw on J&J though did shoe J&J efficacy was holding up at 8 months which is a good sign.
It’s not only efficacy at time of dosing, but over time as well. Normally this would be captured during the phase 3 clinical trials.
I can’t tell you how many people I have spoken that have either had or know someone who had severe reactions but didn’t report them
I can't tell you many people I have spoken to you either but of the ones I did, the most common and severe reactions were cold/flu like symptoms and excessive pain at the injection site. No one I knew needed additional medical attention post-vaccination.
I’ve heard lingering numbness in hands, numbness in leg, severe nausea requiring ER visits, etc.Anecdotally, from everyone I know who got vaccinated, the worst reactions were flu like symptoms for a day and were typically people over 40. Under 40 that I know had very little to no reaction.
severe nausea requiring ER visits,
I’ve heard lingering numbness in hands, numbness in leg, severe nausea requiring ER visits, etc.
So?Most people also claim they had Covid when it first emerged. The mind is a powerful thing......
Someone I know well had a heart attack.Do you think the FDA should have delayed the EUA in order to have more comprehensive efficacy data?
I can't tell you many people I have spoken to you either but of the ones I did, the most common and severe reactions were cold/flu like symptoms and excessive pain at the injection site. No one I knew needed additional medical attention post-vaccination.
How do you know that the heart attacks were linked to the vaccine as opposed to an independent event? A heart attack can happen to healthy adults. The side effects that are certainly linked to the vaccine and specifically JJ are blood clots.Someone I know well had a heart attack.
Healthy guy generally. Not obese. Not a drinker. Heard of 3 other such heart cases in people I know of or heard of through friends. Seems to be the exception. Other worst cases were certainly less dramatic, like 36-48 hours of Covid symptoms albeit many severr including breathing, fever, etc.
The important thing is to report the event and give the FDA the best set of data to continue to monitor the safety and efficacy of the drugs.How do you know that the heart attacks were linked to the vaccine as opposed to an independent event? A heart attack can happen to healthy adults. The side effects that are certainly linked to the vaccine and specifically JJ are blood clots.
I was sick both times with 102 fever for two days after the shot. But that was due to having high antibodies at the time I had the shot.
Yeah, that’s obvious especially as some had tough reactions to the 2nd dose and will think it’ll be same or worse. But you’d think most that thought that getting it was important enough will understand the need for a 3rd, and potentially future shots.I hope it is 100%,but obviously won’t be.
CDC just came out and said the vaccine protection from severe disease and death is waning…. I’ve been saying this for a few months now
Effectiveness against infection has dropped from 92-64% effectiveness. They say protection against sever infection and death are “holding up pretty well”…. I’m not sure we were sold “holding up pretty well” when they first told us about the vaccines… and I will 100% tell you that they are overestimating the effectiveness
What did I make up?
Doesn’t that tell you it’s not as strong as it was. They will never tell you truly
How effective it is and they haven’t since the beginning.
’s never been as strong as they have ever led on…
Effectiveness against infection was most likely no where near as high as they said in their studies before release…
Not committing anything…hallsoccer committing the own goal right now
Not committing anything…
You don’t see it and that’s fine… what were they saying last month? It wasn’t “holding up pretty well”… wait until what they say next month…. All I know is we were promised a lot more than “holding up pretty well”… and that’s being generous"CDC just came out and said the vaccine protection from severe disease and death is waning"
next post:
"They say protection against sever infection and death are “holding up pretty well”
buried the own goal deep in the net
You don’t see it and that’s fine… what were they saying last month? It wasn’t “holding up pretty well”… wait until what they say next month…. All I know is we were promised a lot more than “holding up pretty well”… and that’s being generous
That’s fine I really don’t care.. that 92% isn’t correct right now…What do you think you were promised?
It’s holding up well to a variant that didn’t exist when they made the vaccines. There were no promises it would be as effective no matter what. They even said one of the benefits of mRNA was that they could modify it quickly if needed due to a new variant.
92% effective at keeping people out of the hospital is stil pretty damn good.
Look at numbers from Europe and Israel, look at up to date numbers and reports from states in the USA….it’s not adding up
Have to search for any published information, but the vaccine and boosters are still under the EUA. Data is being collected as part of the EUA. Remember these vaccines were fast tracked, not the way a drug is normally run through trials and approved.Is there any data on safety and efficacy of a booster shot?
JJ gang lets hope no drop in efficacy!Have to search for any published information, but the vaccine and boosters are still under the EUA. Data is being collected as part of the EUA. Remember these vaccines were fast tracked, not the way a drug is normally run through trials and approved.
And this is the first time mRNA is being used to deliver a vaccine. The early data showed the doses to be highly effective, but my guess is the efficacy over time has dropped (which would have been picked up in a normal drug approval process). It could have something to do with it being mRNA.
It will be interesting to see if the J&J vaccine shows the same drop in efficacy.
It also looks like COVID and the variants are going to with us long term, so we are talking about getting boosters continuously (every 8 months?). It’s like the tetanus shot we should get every 10 years), just much more frequently. The thing that remains to be tracked are the long term impact of the mRNA delivery process.
JJ gang! lets hope we can have protection for the long run. dont want a booster, want to avoid shingles this time. if i have to i will, but only after flu season picks up and i can see everyones adverse reactions from it.
CDC just came out and said the vaccine protection from severe disease and death is waning…. I’ve been saying this for a few months now
"Vaccines are our only way out"What do you think you were promised?
cytokine flu season maybeNow you're concerned about adverse reactions?
"Vaccines are our only way out"
"Vaccines allow us to get back to normal"
"If you're vaccinated, you have nothing to worry about"
"If you're vaccinated, you can take off your mask"
Lies like that.
Andrew Cuomo did.