It's the cool thing to do these days. Wouldn't know who Marcus Stroman was otherwise.how this is considered racist? I'm so sick of this nonsense.
Stroman irked by 'racist undertones' in TV crack
After Diamondbacks analyst Bob Brenly made a crack about his head covering during Tuesday's game, Mets starter Marcus Stroman tweeted about "racist undertones."www.espn.com
how this is considered racist? I'm so sick of this nonsense.
Stroman irked by 'racist undertones' in TV crack
After Diamondbacks analyst Bob Brenly made a crack about his head covering during Tuesday's game, Mets starter Marcus Stroman tweeted about "racist undertones."
What does that have to do with him being and attention whore?
awfulannouncing.com
but the woke crowd thinks this is hilarious , because its at the expense of white people
I think the former takes things too far but we are in inching there and I understand your point
Preaching to the converted, but "equally" or "equality" is no longer even the favored buzzword. Now it is "equity". I've had to sit through virtual seminars on this the past year. It has become a cottage industry for those on the speaking circuit to make $ presenting to businesses on this stuff. I always ask the question why we have moved from the "equality" or the "equal" standard, i.e., treating people the same and rewarding people based solely on the merits, as opposed to other factors. I never get an answer that really makes sense, except that it seems "equity" is rooted in the outcomes, not necessarily having the same opportunity per se for all. So, as a generalized example, if you have a HS in NYC that has admission-based standards that are offered to and administered the same regardless of race, gender or background, and the result of that criteria is that for every 10 admissions, 5 are Asian, 4 are White, and 1 is Latino or African American, there is apparently a problem that "equity" is designed to fix.
