But the question is, what will get Kevin Willard's mind right? Lol.In that first half we were not better with him on the floor. I'm sure KW will get his mind right during the break.
Watson made Whitehead look ordinary....at best.But the question is, what will get Kevin Willard's mind right? Lol.
will never change. And that's too bad.
Now that's what I'm talking about!But the question is, what will get Kevin Willard's mind right? Lol.
IW needs to grow up and be a team player.
I wonder if he is sorry he came here...making him change his thinking, not really using his talent to the fullest. If he went to a school with one or two other M. A. A., he could continue playing the game where he was one of the best. I not sure if he is thinking this but I am.
Yes. I don't think people remember what they watched. He was not great but far from bad. We had the lead with him playing. Angels d was awful and I would have benched him after that t. Desi I saw like I saw iw. Not a great game but not awful. Gordon played well. Braeden didn't do much subbing for ad and I wished Anthony was playing. And I saw all three kids cheering. They were in front of me and I watched them put their hands together.I really disagree. Not saying he played well today. The 2nd and 3rd fouls took him out of it. I
don't think he was the story as far as the basketball is concerned. We played atrocious defense
and the frontcourt was just brutal today. IW was not allowing easy basket after easy basket.
I think he's playing better this year.
I think he is trying
What we watched was too many poor shots early in the shot clock. No 22 foot shots with 17 secs remaining please. Yes he makes 1 out of 5 but when the going gets tough don't throw up 3s. How about some extra passes. And how about some better passes and ball control.Yes. I don't think people remember what they watched. He was not great but far from bad. We had the lead with him playing. Angels d was awful and I would have benched him after that t. Desi I saw like I saw iw. Not a great game but not awful. Gordon played well. Braeden didn't do much subbing for ad and I wished Anthony was playing. And I saw all three kids cheering. They were in front of me and I watched them put their hands together.
More disappointed in Angel and Desi than Whitehead. Wish he would get off social media or control some of the comments, but his play on the court has improved since last year.
Imo, isaiah gets less praise here than any of our guys. Jeremy was also treated the same way here.Whitehead is a McD AA who is not playing like one so far through two seasons. He has played for the most part a very selfish game. He is not all that quick, he is not that good of a shooter and he is not a good foul shooter. Instead of making his teammates better, he does not trust them and thinks he should take all the shots.
He has been essentially treated deferentially by this board. Contrast this to what used to be said of Jeremy Hazel. Hazel was an under recruited player who played far better than Whitehead as thus far during their freshman and sophomore years.
Hazel used to be criticized as a volume shooter who was always looking for his own shot and not anyone else. Well, at least Hazell made his shots and shot for a better percentage. Hazel was and is an under appreciated Pirate. Jeremy was a a game changer.
Creighton coach has recruited well for all positions. Watson a transfer from BU who makes everyone around him better. True pass first point guard with plenty of ball movement/shooters to make him look good. Let's hope we bounce back against Providence.That Watson kid could be my point guard any day.
If you had to guess right now, do you think he will "never change?" I agree with your point, i just wonder how many people in the back of their minds believe differently.I'm not thrilled with the way things have shaken out since he's arrived, and some of it is his fault, and plenty of it is not, but it's terribly unfair and really ridiculous to say that IW, halfway through his sophomore year, will "never change."
For anyone with more than a 50 IQ can notice that Isaiah has and is willing to change/develop. He's a very driven young man and it has been noticeable especially this year because of his position change. Unfortunately, Kevin Willard is not going to be able to teach Isaiah anything more. Not that Kevin isn't a good coach, it's that he has no experience developing NBA players. Isaiah is the most talented player Kevin has ever recruited. Kevin is used to coaching mediocre to decent basketball player. Not superstars.
I'm glad Isaiah chose us. But I wonder where he would be if he had chosen Indiana or Pittsburgh.
Kid definitely gets an unfair wrap, mainly IMO because the expectations placed on him by this board were completely unreasonable. He's still too inefficient, inconsistent, and ball dominant. Some of that is his fault, some can be attributed to inexperience, and some is a byproduct of the horse**** offense we run.
The comparison between JT and IW kind of underscores the way in which IW has been set up for disappointment this year. As a sophomore, JT was a role player, splitting time with Harvey, surrounded by upperclassmen, and playing in an offense that was at least somewhat efficient.I agree there is a lot of silliness over the tweet a few days ago, and some of the locker room BS from last year.
I will say most of the grief given on this board to Isaiah has been about ill-advised shots and poor distribution. People recognize how talented he is, but if your talent for something doesn't show up in the results than people are going to ask about what is going on. I do understand that transitioning roles takes time, and I hope he can really grow into a distributor as well as a shooter. I thought the big rationale for his transition was that he is short for an SG at the next level, and needs to become more of a PG. Not sure if that's true but that's what I remember reading.
His stats:
1.5 Assist/Turnover Ratio, 15 points per game but taking significantly more shots than anyone else at a lower clip (.352 FG%, .322 3P%).
Since he was brought up I wanted to look at Jordan when he was a sophomore.
Theo:
2.33 Assist/Turnover, 9.8 points per game at a clip of (.419 FG%, .365 3P%)
This whole post is very questionable and feels like an emotional post-game reaction (and I have had these so I'm not innocent either).
When we recruited him we knew he was not a PG. So last year we have him playing the three. And now this year he is making a significant change to play the PG position. And he is still our most talented player but he came from a background of street AAU ball that won't work here and people are unhappy with the uneven play. If you look at the history I'm actually surprised he is doing this well to be honest. The kid is an excellent defender and gives us all he is on every play. I've never seen him take a play off. He is struggling with his shooting and is still battling those old AAU tendencies and needs to recognize/take better shots. But I think he is a gym rat and will keep working. I'm behind the kid and glad he came here. I'm not sure about the coaching overall for the team and because IW is the MCDAA he is getting a lot of heat after the Creighton game. Creighton exposed us and looked pretty good against Providence last night. I'm hoping Creighton is a lot better than advertised and this game is just part of the maturation process. Creighton is a very, very well coached team.
IW will never be Shaheen Holloway (our last McDAA) - two very different players. .