ADVERTISEMENT

NCAA clears student-athletes to pursue name, image and likeness deals

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
186,467
99,934
113

Dan Murphy
ESPN Staff Writer

Every NCAA athlete in the country will be able to make money from endorsements and through a variety of other ventures starting Thursday.

The NCAA's board of directors decided Wednesday to officially suspend the organization's rules prohibiting athletes from selling the rights to their names, images and likenesses. The new rules represent a major shift in the association's definition of amateurism -- a shift that NCAA leaders previously believed was antithetical to the nature of college sports.

"This is an important day for college athletes since they all are now able to take advantage of name, image and likeness opportunities," NCAA president Mark Emmert said in a statement. "With the variety of state laws adopted across the country, we will continue to work with Congress to develop a solution that will provide clarity on a national level. The current environment -- both legal and legislative -- prevents us from providing a more permanent solution and the level of detail student-athletes deserve."

The board's decision comes after several years of debate and just one day before laws will go into effect in more than a dozen states that will make it illegal for schools to follow the long-standing NCAA rules that have, until this week, prohibited athletes from making money.

NCAA rules that prevent schools from paying players directly remain intact. The board directed schools to make sure that payments to athletes are not expressly for their athletic achievements and to ensure that no payments are used as recruiting inducements.

The new rules will allow athletes to profit by monetizing social media accounts, signing autographs, teaching camps or lessons, starting their own businesses, and participating in advertising campaigns, among many other potential ventures. Athletes will be allowed to sign with agents or other representatives to help them acquire endorsement deals.

Some opportunities will be restricted, but the types of restrictions will vary based on state laws and policies created by individual schools. For example, some but not all state laws prohibit athletes from endorsing alcohol, tobacco or gambling products. Some but not all laws prohibit athletes from using their school's logos or other copyright material in endorsements.

According to Wednesday's rule change, schools in states that have an NIL law on the books are instructed to follow state law while determining what their athletes can do. The NCAA instructed schools located in states without an active NIL law to create and publish their own policies to provide clarity to the gray area and come up with a plan to resolve any disputes that arise.

College sports stakeholders tried for more than two years to develop more specific guidelines to help schools navigate the inevitable and considerable gray areas that will arise while trying to navigate the broad rules that shape the new, unprecedented marketplace created by these changes. Legal concerns, which were amplified by last week's Supreme Court opinion on the NCAA's business model, forced the rulemakers to be less detailed and prescriptive than they would have preferred.


The board of directors said Wednesday that its rule changes are intended to be temporary to make sure all athletes have some opportunity to profit from NIL as state laws start to go into effect. The board is hoping that Congress will help create a uniform national law that allows for clearer regulations for future college athlete NIL deals.

Members of Congress have proposed more than a half-dozen bills aimed at reforming college sports. Some are focused specifically on addressing a national standard for NIL deals. Others seek to add some significant changes that include giving athletes additional medical benefits, more educational opportunities and the rights to collectively bargain in the future. Disagreements among Republicans and Democrats about the scope of changes Congress should impose on the NCAA have stalled legislative efforts in Washington, D.C., in the past month.

Meanwhile, athletes around the country are preparing for new opportunities on the eve of what some in college sports say will be the industry's most transformative summer since Title IX was enacted nearly 50 years ago. Several high-profile athletes are expected to announce new partnerships and deals starting Thursday morning.
 
Pandora's Box is officially open for business. Can't wait to see the unintended consequences of this...


If Tommy Amaker can the players into the school he could be a big winner here. He probably knows quite a few Harvard alums willing to pay big money for an autographed Harvard jersey of a future NBA lottery pick or help with connections to major players in all of business to give out big contracts. The key is can he get them into the school. Once he does I’m sure he can match NIL with anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LBP43
The NCAA "authorized " what it was told to do by the Supreme. Court. The NCAA is and was what it has always been --a corrupt bunch of thieves trying to steal money for their own purposes with selective enforcement or their "illegal Rules".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Halldan1 and mbraue

College athletes set to execute unique, lucrative NIL endorsement deals as midnight strikes on July 1​

State laws and an NCAA waiver are opening the floodgates for college athletes​


By Dennis Dodd

As details of name, image and likeness deals for college athletes rolled in Wednesday, the prospect of midnight on July 1 becoming an NIL version of New Year's Eve became reality. The NCAA Division I Board of Directors made it so by approving an interim policy that removes restrictions from athletes hoping to earn unprecedented riches.

The NCAA couldn't afford to go past midnight without some sort of policy addressing the years-long NIL battle it eventually lost. So, it essentially waived Bylaw 12.5.5, a portion of its amateurism rules. Read more here on the NCAA's waiver, what it accomplishes and why it was necessary given the lack of nationwide guidance on NIL.

Athletes will celebrate the stroke of 12 by being compensated for use of their names, images and likenesses – rights with which the rest of us received upon our birth and never lost by choosing to play NCAA sports.

Advertisers and athletes will crow about their new partnerships. College athletics will be changed forever. This is how the ramp up to midnight looks.

Alabama freshman defensive back Ga'Quincy "Kool-Aid" McKinstry will initially become one of the highest-profile athletes to enter into an agreement. In fact, SkyBox Sports was already selling his NFT for $750 by Wednesday afternoon. (SkyBox later claimed that was a test page. Later in the day, the price had been removed.) Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are a form of collective cryptocurrency. Think of them as certificates of authenticity for digital assets or collectible electronic trading cards.

SkyBox CEO Derrick Thomas, 30, played college basketball at Drexel in Philadelphia. During his senior year in 2013, he created an online platform to help athletes in the agent dealings. Thomas gave those players a "scorecard" on the agents they were meeting.

This is a big deal because McKinstry was 247Sports' No. 1-ranked cornerback in the Class of 2021. He has yet to play a snap for the Crimson Tide.

For mere mortals, NFTs have been hard to explain. Don't expect the process to become any easier. "Think of it as a ticket, but it's not a ticket," Thomas explained, "a piece that tells his story in art form, takes a snapshot of his life. When NFT holders collect this, they are granted access to his experience."

Language was removed from the website advertising McKinstry's NFT, which said buyers receive "admission to an Alabama home game from Kool-Aid's personal tickets" along with a meet and greet with Kool-Aid (autographs, photos) after the game. Buyers will be able to run drills with McKinstry in the offseason.

No word on what Alabama coach Nick Saban thinks of that.

"Where we see the true value is the players are getting the majority of the revenue," Thomas said. "The athletes own the value they create."

Drew Butler had just landed Wednesday in New York for a midnight debut. Not his, the twins from Fresno State who has long been projected to take over the NIL space -- at least in the short term.

Haley and Hanna Cavinder are a pair of guards for the Bulldogs who have come along at exactly the right time for NIL. They have cultivated a TikTok following of three million. They are playful, talented, attractive, and oh, and they can play a little basketball. The Cavinders might the hottest NIL property right out of the gate as the clock strikes midnight when NCAA amateurism rules basically go away.

Butler was in New York as partner for Icon Source, a sports marketing firm that figures to be one of the biggest players on the NIL stage. There is going to be a giant rollout at midnight. Even if it is just social media, what better place to do it than New York?

"It's long overdue," said Butler, best known as a former All-American punter at Georgia.

The Cavinders could be the first and most lucrative of several national deals to be announced. The twins' value has already been estimated $1 million by Opendorse CEO Blake Lawrence. The frequency of those mega-deals is going to be fluid, but they will happen sometimes in the unlikeliest of circumstances.

"Think about a guy like Joe Burrow," Butler said. "Relatively unknown going into his senior year. … His NIL value from a national perspective went bonkers from the SEC championship to winning the Heisman, to blowing out Oklahoma to then taking down Clemson. He would have crazy amounts of national deals in a four-week span."

Icon Source was started by Chase Garrett, a former athlete marketer for Red Bull who signed the likes of Reggie Bush and Kris Bryant. That list is about to grow quickly in the college space. The Denver-based company will have more than 1,000 college athletes ready to execute deals at midnight.

Sources say some of the hottest endorsers in this early NIL era are going to be women, non-revenue sports athletes and those competing at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs). Deion Sanders going to Jackson State is viewed as cool. Icon Source already has two Jackson State players signed.


One Big Ten player who did not want to be identified has a business plan valued at over $300,000. The far-reaching plan accounts for income through his remaining eligibility. Athletes will be purchasing their domain names and building a variety of businesses from scratch.


Some like Drake basketball guard Joseph Yesufu will look for grassroot deals. Others will sign deals through open source offerings created for athletes. Runza will provide endorsement deals to the first 100 college athletes in the state of Nebraska to opt in. What's Runza? It's a chain of fast-food joints that sell a hamburger-like sandwich native to Nebraska that is made with ground-beef, onions, a "secret blend" of spices and cabbage. Bon appetit.


It's appropriate the last word comes from Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA). It was her Senate Committee on Commerce that was unable to come up with a federal bill in time to quell the current chaos. The question is whether a federal bill will ever emerge to bail out the NCAA.

"Today's decision from the NCAA is a welcome acknowledgment that college athletics must do more for college athletes," said Cantwell, chair of the committee, in a statement. "However, today's interim action is no substitute for a national standard that not only gives our student athletes the ability to control their own Name, Image, and Likeness rights, but also includes health care, safety, scholarship, and transfer protections. I look forward to continuing to work towards a bipartisan plan that accomplishes those goals while setting one uniform standard across the country so all of our athletes and schools can safely compete on a level playing field."


And away we go …
 
The NCAA "authorized " what it was told to do by the Supreme. Court. The NCAA is and was what it has always been --a corrupt bunch of thieves trying to steal money for their own purposes with selective enforcement or their "illegal Rules".
Remember, the NCAA is made up of its member schools, so if you indict the NCAA, you are indicting Seton Hall and all other member schools. And you are not wrong.
 
Remember, the NCAA is made up of its member schools, so if you indict the NCAA, you are indicting Seton Hall and all other member schools. And you are not wrong.
A point that Pat Lyons made it our soon to be published interview.
 
Rutgers just agreed to a partnership, is Seton Hall going to announce anything or what ?
 

What NCAA’s major rule change means for St. John’s​

By Zach Braziller

Across the country, college athletes can now profit off their Name, Image and Likeness (NIL) following the NCAA’s Division I Board of Directors vote to adopt an interim policy effective Thursday with several state laws going into effect.

And St. John’s players can benefit as well.

Shortly after the announcement, athletic director Mike Cragg sent out a memo to student-athletes, coaches and administrators outlining the Queens school’s plan. Schools in states without laws that have been passed can create their own guidelines as long as they meet the NCAA’s parameters.

According to the memo, St. John’s athletes are now allowed to hire representation to broker deals and can refer to themselves as players at the school, but are not free to use any St. John’s markings without first obtaining permission in writing from the school. Compensation is not allowed in exchange for attendance at St. John’s or athletic performance, and all contracts can’t exceed the player’s time at the school. Also, students are not allowed to endorse alcohol, tobacco products, e-cigarettes, a seller or dispensary of a controlled substance, anabolic steroids, sports betting, casino gambling or an adult entertainment business. They all must gain approval before agreeing to any deals and the school cannot aid them in any way.

“As far as what they get paid, that’s their business and not ours,” Cragg told The Post. “All they have to do is disclose it.”

St. John’s does feel ready for it. Last November, it launched UNLIMITED, a program designed to prepare student-athletes, coaches and staff members for NIL. There’s a 13-credit minor, launched in the spring and created by its Peter J. Tobin College of Business, in sports leadership and branding available for any student. St. John’s has also partnered with INFLCR and Teamworks, companies that specialize in social media branding.

How much St. John’s can benefit from NIL remains uncertain. It is located in New York City, where there could be plenty of opportunities for its athletes, most notably members of the flagship men’s basketball program. But this is a pro town as well with celebrity options, whereas in college towns schools like Kentucky, Alabama and Duke are the main draws.

“I don’t know if we have a big advantage. I don’t think we have a big disadvantage, but we’re going to promote it as we have since November,” Cragg said. “We feel like we’re in the best city in America and the opportunities in New York City are like no other. We see this as a positive new asset to the St. John’s experience.”

The men’s basketball coaching staff has talked to prospective recruits in broad terms about the advantage of attending St. John’s in the NIL era, and now can provide more details. This could also play a factor for wing Julian Champagnie, who is testing the NBA draft waters and has to decide by next Wednesday if he will return, since the Brooklyn native would likely be the most marketable player on the team. A source close to Champagnie said if the Big East’s leading scorer did decide to return to school, making money off of NIL would ease that decision somewhat.

Mike Repole, the Vitamin Water co-founder and owner of BodyArmor Superdrink from Queens, believes for St John’s players to really profit from NIL, the program would need to have the level of success it had in the 1980s when it had recognizable stars like Chris Mullin and Walter Berry. But he does think Champagnie would be able to reap some rewards if he did return.

“I think he is a great regional player, and there could definitely be some regional, local deals he could benefit from,” Repole said.
 
Here you go. I suspect the NIL will lead to a lot of friction between team members and recruiting will be of a cesspool than it already is.



Andrew Brandt

@AndrewBrandt

Heard this happening in NIL regarding a top football program: Flagship radio station will pick five star players; they will come on for a segment every week of the season and earn $25,000 for the year.
 
For the life of me I can’t fathom why anyone would think this a bad thing? I mean why would anyone ever be against another human making money off of who they are and what they do? And no it’s not just the ‘big’ athletes that it helps has we have seen with some of these early announcements of potential deals one athlete that may make the most money is a female gymnast from LSU due to her large following on social media so just be being able to now make money she will be allowed to earn money off of stuff she is already doing. Literally nothing changes other than the fact that she gets to make money now.
 
For the life of me I can’t fathom why anyone would think this a bad thing? I mean why would anyone ever be against another human making money off of who they are and what they do? And no it’s not just the ‘big’ athletes that it helps has we have seen with some of these early announcements of potential deals one athlete that may make the most money is a female gymnast from LSU due to her large following on social media so just be being able to now make money she will be allowed to earn money off of stuff she is already doing. Literally nothing changes other than the fact that she gets to make money now.
And how many guys are going to go do interviews, signings, etc instead of going to class or putting in less time working on their craft. So I think quite a few things will be changing.

I also think the lack of value to the tax free education they are receiving is sad. They're literally walking out of school with an advantage on everyone who has to pay down a student loan. They get to make money now, no need to give the athletic scholarship. But we don't live in a world where you have to give up something to get something, it's just gimme, gimme, gimme.

It may not be just the "big athletes" but it will be the athletes at the "big schools." In Baton Rouge it's all about LSU athletics all of the time. In Tuscaloosa, it's all about Bama athletics all of the time. They're the big athletes of the area. The major cities schools will suffer because it will take a rare talent to steal spotlight from professional athletes in that area. You also are going to have one hell of a time getting an SPU, Bloomfield, Monmouth, or St. Thomas Acquinas athlete paid.
 
For the life of me I can’t fathom why anyone would think this a bad thing? I mean why would anyone ever be against another human making money off of who they are and what they do? And no it’s not just the ‘big’ athletes that it helps has we have seen with some of these early announcements of potential deals one athlete that may make the most money is a female gymnast from LSU due to her large following on social media so just be being able to now make money she will be allowed to earn money off of stuff she is already doing. Literally nothing changes other than the fact that she gets to make money now.
Well said. I don’t get it either. I will say I would love to see the NCAA basketball video game come back. I used to love playing as SHU and playing against all the schools we don’t normally play against.
 
And how many guys are going to go do interviews, signings, etc instead of going to class or putting in less time working on their craft. So I think quite a few things will be changing.

I also think the lack of value to the tax free education they are receiving is sad. They're literally walking out of school with an advantage on everyone who has to pay down a student loan. They get to make money now, no need to give the athletic scholarship. But we don't live in a world where you have to give up something to get something, it's just gimme, gimme, gimme.

It may not be just the "big athletes" but it will be the athletes at the "big schools." In Baton Rouge it's all about LSU athletics all of the time. In Tuscaloosa, it's all about Bama athletics all of the time. They're the big athletes of the area. The major cities schools will suffer because it will take a rare talent to steal spotlight from professional athletes in that area. You also are going to have one hell of a time getting an SPU, Bloomfield, Monmouth, or St. Thomas Acquinas athlete paid.
At some point we have to get off the free education piece. In no way are fans looking at players as student athletes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doctorcb12
At some point we have to get off the free education piece. In no way are fans looking at players as student athletes.

I've always looked at college players as student athletes. That's what they are. If I wanted to watch professional basketball, I'd watch the NBA.
 
At some point we have to get off the free education piece. In no way are fans looking at players as student athletes.
What does how the fans view them as have to do with anything. The fans couldn’t care less if they ever take a class. Should we say who cares if they take a class? Maybe that wouldn’t be the worst thing either.

How many men’s basketball players in the KW era have annually made more than the annual cost of a SHU education playing basketball in the US free market? The US free market basically says that 60k free education annually is a pretty sweet deal. They can leave now if they want to test the European market.
 
Last edited:

NCAA ushering in the NIL era marks the beginning of the end for college athletes being treated unfairly​

The NCAA wanted you to believe this day would be a nightmare, but it's exactly the opposite​


By Gary Parrish

The announcement came Wednesday, mid-afternoon, roughly nine hours before college athletics changed significantly. Jordan Bohannon, a sixth-year basketball player at Iowa, let it be known that he would be signing autographs at a local fireworks stand on the first day in history that NCAA student-athletes are legally allowed to profit from their name, image and likeness. He got paid to be there.

This is, quite literally, what the NCAA has forever fought against.

Players have been suspended for less.

NCAA officials (and the system's nonsensical supporters) have long argued that the world would more or less end if this day ever arrived. Clemson football coach Dabo Swinney once promised he'd "go do something else" if student-athletes ever got paid. But now here we are, on this transcendent Thursday, and to the surprise of no one with a brain, the world has not ended. Also: Dabo Swinney has so far declined to "go do something else." He remains the coach at Clemson and presumably will for the foreseeable future despite past promises. In reality, the only thing that has changed is that student-athletes are finally being allowed to profit the way basically everybody else connected to college athletics has been profiting.

And it's glorious!

By Thursday morning, Bohannon was selling t-shirts online while Gonzaga freshman Chet Holmgren, the No. 1 prospect in the Class of 2021, was publicly fishing for a deal with a healthy food brand. Matthew Coghlin, a Michigan State football player, disclosed that he was paid to promote a podcast on Twitter. And Johnny Manziel, the former Heisman Trophy winner who was once punished for signing autographs while at Texas A&M, was providing advice for current student-athletes to capitalize in every way possible.



Make bank bros, indeed.

And gals, too.

For years, some have insisted that granting student-athletes name, image and likeness rights would only impact a small group of people -- yet not even one full day into it, we now know nothing could be further from the truth. People I've literally never heard of spent Thursday announcing various deals. So perhaps there isn't money to be made for everybody, but there's clearly money to be made for lots of people in lots of ways. And it's not just football players and men's basketball players who are profiting. Turns out, being the star player in a high-profile sport might not be as valuable in some cases as being a social media star in any sport.

Take Hanna and Haley Cavinder, for instance.

They are twins with massive social media followings who also happen to play basketball at Fresno State. Until today, they were not allowed to capitalize monetarily the way so many other young women with large social media followings do. But within hours of the rules changing, they announced what are believed to be lucrative marketing deals with Boost Mobile and a supplement company called Six Star. Then there's Olivia Dunne, a gymnast at LSU, who has 3.9 million followers on TikTok and 1.1 million followers on Instagram. She takes lots of pictures in swimsuits and posts them. So it's not hard to imagine swimsuit companies offering her big contracts to promote a specific brand, and there's some thought that she'll ultimately earn more money than any other athlete currently enrolled in college, male or female, regardless of sport.

It really is a new world.

And, yes, all of this will very quickly be turned into a recruiting tool despite the fact that the NCAA says it's not allowed to be a recruiting tool; good luck enforcing that, by the way! Like it or not, high school prospects will sometimes pick a school based on where they know they can make the most money. And players will sometimes transfer to a place where they know they can make more money. And players who are considering transferring or turning pro will sometimes decide to stay put based on a promise of more deals and more money.

It's all fine with me.

The truth is that players have been making college decisions for similar reasons for decades -- just under the table and in violation of NCAA rules. This will merely bring everything into the light. And though I don't believe, like some do, that it'll lead to the biggest schools essentially buying the perceived best players, I also don't care if it does. The biggest schools already buy the perceived best athletic directors, coaches and trainers, so I've never understood why the line should be drawn at the players. But, again, I don't believe NIL rights will just widen the gap between the top of the sport and everybody else as much as I believe NIL rights will give second-tier programs a new way to actually compete with top-tier programs.

Question: What's more profitable -- being the fifth-best recruit at Kentucky or the top recruit at Ole Miss? For the past decade-plus, if a borderline top-50 prospect was being recruited by Kentucky and Ole Miss, he'd almost certainly pick Kentucky even if he were the least-heralded prospect in UK's class and unlikely to play as a freshman. But, in this new world, the smarter move for that exact prospect might be to pick Ole Miss over Kentucky, become the prize of the Rebels' recruiting class, start as a freshman and cash-in with Allen Samuels Jeep Ram of Oxford or some other car dealership in the area.

These are the types of things that'll now be weighed.

And guess what? Everything will be OK.

Alabama and Auburn will still play football in sold-out stadiums, Duke and North Carolina will still play basketball in sold-out arenas, and the same people who have been watching Olivia Dunne flip will continue to watch Olivia Dunne flip. Despite what the NCAA has long insisted, the fact that student-athletes have finally been given nearly the same rights to compensation that all other students possess won't impact the way we watch and enjoy college sports in any tangible way.

Bottom line, the boogey man is here -- but he's not as scary as they swore he'd be. So don't let anybody tell you this landmark day represents the beginning of the end of college athletics -- because it's not that at all. It's just the beginning of the end of college athletes being treated unfairly and limited in ways that have long been immoral and arguably illegal.

 
  • Like
Reactions: doctorcb12
And the media wants you to believe it's a great day. It's not. It's the end of college sports.
 
And the media wants you to believe it's a great day. It's not. It's the end of college sports.
I believe this will be very bad for college sports especially combined with no sit out, but I think it’s far from the end. What’s really scary is young people are now going to be making a very important decision of what college to attend to benefit their next 4 years not their next 40 years. Heck you might get more money to be on the end of the bench player at LSU than being a star at George Mason. The big guys got more powerful.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT