
New Jersey to require 2nd graders learn about gender identity in fall, alarming parents
The New Jersey Department of Education is pushing for a more robust sex education curriculum that teaches gender theory to kids just leaving kindergarten.
Teaching racism and gender bias is part of dumbing down the population. My kids school was teaching that blacks were treated unfairly in first grade. The kids were all friends with a clean slate, by the time the idiots were done the black children were ashamed and felt different. Racism is past down from one generation to the next sad but true. Now they are going to confused the hell out of kids by giving them a choice of their sexuality.children are free from gender bias. they already dont think about it. why are we forcing them to think about it?
children are free from gender bias. they already dont think about it. why are we forcing them to think about it?
My wife does the school drop off and pick up most of the time but when I go, the far majority of parents or caretakers there are women. A stay at home mom is normal. A stay at home dad is very abnormal from their perspective.
Unrelated question: Why does seemingly every parent drop their child off at school these days? Why don't they take the school bus? The traffic outside most schools in the morning is ridiculous because of all the parents driving their kids themselves rather than taking the bus.
I took the bus to school 99% of the time.
From ed odowd's post: "Are the majority of Americans so uniformed that they believe the march to socialism is a good thing ?"
Unfortunately, I think that young inexperienced voters tend to follow the MSM or nothing at all and either way, they are either ill-informed or mis-informed.
Nice spin book keeperAs a parent, I can assure you that statement is not correct. Kids have a very strong gender bias.
Gender norms for kids is something they learn from their environment. Everything they get is gendered from diapers to toys. Most will either be a part of a "moms group" or they will be raised by a nanny. I didn't say female nanny there. We all just assume that will be a woman.
My wife does the school drop off and pick up most of the time but when I go, the far majority of parents or caretakers there are women. A stay at home mom is normal. A stay at home dad is very abnormal from their perspective.
Kids take all that in because that's the world they grow up in.
Talking about gender roles and stereotypes isn't a bad thing for elementary school. Gender identity though is a different topic that I believe would be inappropriate.
Gender bias and gender identity are two very different things.
I believe there are appropriate topics around gender bias that can be taught at an early aged. Gender identity, a big no.
As far as bias, I think there is a balance between letting kids be kids and teaching them things. Things that promote girls (future women) to dream big and be anything they want is a good thing. I recall years ago being confused when I first heard the many of the great chefs in the world were men. Same thing when I first heard about a male nurse.
On the flip side, its ok to believe girls have cooites up until a certain point.
Agree with all of that.
Here is what the NJ standard says for k-2
1.2.SSH.1: Discuss how individuals make their own choices about how to express themselves.
2.1.2.SSH.2: Discuss the range of ways people express their gender and how gender role stereotypes may limit behavior.
I get where people may interpreted as them teaching kids about identity, but since that is more explicitly stated for later grades, my guess is that those lessons would be more about trying to prevent bullying for kids that may be different especially considering the next part is about bullying.
2.1.2.SSH.9: Define bullying and teasing and explain why they are wrong and harmful.
I'm not a big fan of ambiguity for something like this so I think they should be more upfront and clear about what the lesson plans will look like for each grade though.
dont aasume the stupidity of schools these days. its a not the same worldHey Merge, is this the new proposed curriculum? If so, can you share a link?
I have not been able to find this anywhere, and no credible news sources seem to be giving this any attention that I could find. I just cant believe fake news sources like Breibardt or The Millennium Times are sharing the truth on this issue or that our public schools would be this stupid to be getting into the intimate details of human sexual organs with 2nd graders.
Not fake news.Approved in 2020 but now getting real because it is to be implemented in September 2022. Some of the recommended lesson plans floated by the state are just seeing the light of day including labeling private parts by 2nd graders.Hey Merge, is this the new proposed curriculum? If so, can you share a link?
I have not been able to find this anywhere, and no credible news sources seem to be giving this any attention that I could find. I just cant believe fake news sources like Breibardt or The Millennium Times are sharing the truth on this issue or that our public schools would be this stupid to be getting into the intimate details of human sexual organs with 2nd graders.
Hey Merge, is this the new proposed curriculum? If so, can you share a link?
I have not been able to find this anywhere, and no credible news sources seem to be giving this any attention that I could find. I just cant believe fake news sources like Breibardt or The Millennium Times are sharing the truth on this issue or that our public schools would be this stupid to be getting into the intimate details of human sexual organs with 2nd graders.
Not fake news.Approved in 2020 but now getting real because it is to be implemented in September 2022. Some of the recommended lesson plans floated by the state are just seeing the light of day including labeling private parts by 2nd graders.
![]()
Do New Jersey's new sex education standards go too far? Some say yes
Some critics and state board members objected, saying the standards would violate parents' rights to teach about sensitive subjects.www.northjersey.comAsbury Park Press
www.app.com
Yes but the recommended approach to implementing the curriculum is completely over the top. Hopefully reasonable minds prevail but again the focus is all wrong. We take our kids and teacher's away from what is important and that is teaching the basics to our kids instead of spending so much time on this stuff. My daughter is a teacher and she is great with kids and has been teaching for about 8 years and is so fed up with the states constantly changing the curriculum and telling them what to teach and she says there is not enough time for math and reading in second grade. Political agendas over what the kids really need is the ongoing BS that has to stop and unfortunately so many of the school boards are now into the agenda instead of what is best for the kids. My former town of Randolph NJ is a perfect example.But at the same time none of those lesson plans have been adopted.
Like I said, I don't like the ambiguity but I think it may be a little early to grab the pitchforks.