What do you take out of the text of the bill that makes you think this is OK?
I can't help you if you do not understand English.
Nonetheless, I will give it a whirl.
My cousin is a plastic surgeon. He does breast reconstruction. His focus is on cancer patients and disfiguration. As a matter of conscience, he will not accept a patient who wants glamour breasts, i.e. a normal, healthy woman who wants to go from a 36 C to 40 E just because she wants big breasts.
Should he lose his license or be canceled or be fired from the hospital because he doesn't want to perform the surgery?
Should a doctor lose his license because he refuses to perform an abortion where there is no threat to the mother?
The wording in the Bill is silent on LBGTQ. It is silent on the person to whom is receiving the procedure. It only cites the procedure and the physicians right to object to procedures that are counter to their beliefs.
Do you think there is a single physician in the world that would deny any person
needed medical attention? The bill is worded such that a physician who discriminates is not protected by the Bill. For example, a physician will not treat a broken arm. There is no sound basis for a physician to object to that as a matter of conscience.
Having your breast removed because you now think you are a man is a choice. It is an elective procedure that is not a medical need. Same with turning your penis into a vagina. 99.99+% of the time abortion are not needed. They are a choice. Isn't that what liberals call it. Choice? If it is a choice, then it is not a medical emergency or necessity. A physican should not be forced into performing an abortion.
The bill would also require that the physician pass records to a physician who is willing to perform it and not withhold the records unreasonably.
I see nothing wrong with the bill.
www.pbs.org
www.arkleg.state.ar.us
