ADVERTISEMENT

The Board Thinks They are Biased.

Thoughtful piece, ignores and tries to explain away years of bias, but thoughtful. The facts are that their left-leaning editorial stance bled into their objective news coverage both in what they chose to cover and how they covered it. While NJ may be heavily "blue", their subscription base may not have been. I don't have any data on that so it is wild speculation on my part, but it would not be surprising to me if it were true.

A truth that is not really acknowledged in the piece is their missteps in evolving with the changing medium. They are not alone in that, but that IMHO played a larger role in their downfall than any left/right issues.
 
What a load of crap! How long before they turn around their awful sports coverage? I wouldn’t hold my breath, even if they do try to change, as soon as they have your money they will go back to their old ways. They won’t get a penny from me and I’m sure others agree!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomD82
The saddest part is that for 50 years the first thing I did In the morning was read the Star Ledger. It was the best sports page and editorial page around. Back in the day their editorial page had writers on both sides of issues that were well written and easy to understand. The collapse of such a great paper makes me very sad. I cancelled my subscription 10 years ago and only read their web articles if I stumble across one on another site.
 
And again it is a big-time mistruth for them to call what they are asking for a “subscription” .... you are not getting anything extra for your monthly $10. It is strictly a donation. They should just send out people with cans outside the local ShopRite on Saturday morning, because it’s no different.

And just remember.... the Newhouse family is worth $18 billion and just paid $375 million to buy the Ironman Triathlon. But they want a $10 a month donation from its nj.com readers.
 

Mulshine is more of an old-school
Conservative rather than a modern day Republican.

But more than that, he is basically their token voice who doesn’t have a hard left-leaning view. It’s like them pointing to a few Myles Powell features and saying “Hey, we don’t ignore Seton Hall.” Since most people on the left hate anything Fox News, it’s also the same as pointing to the presence of Juan Williams on their network as a sign of balance.
 
Mulshine is more of an old-school
Conservative rather than a modern day Republican.

But more than that, he is basically their token voice who doesn’t have a hard left-leaning view. It’s like them pointing to a few Myles Powell features and saying “Hey, we don’t ignore Seton Hall.” Since most people on the left hate anything Fox News, it’s also the same as pointing to the presence of Juan Williams on their network as a sign of balance.
Give me the old school conservative over the modern day republican all day and every day.
 
Mulshine is more of an old-school
Conservative rather than a modern day Republican.

But more than that, he is basically their token voice who doesn’t have a hard left-leaning view. It’s like them pointing to a few Myles Powell features and saying “Hey, we don’t ignore Seton Hall.” Since most people on the left hate anything Fox News, it’s also the same as pointing to the presence of Juan Williams on their network as a sign of balance.

Again, I am what you would consider "hard left". Unless they're on there fighting for things like democratic socialism, reparations, the Green New Deal, the end of globalization, ending all college debt, the slashing of our military by half or more, the legalization or all drugs, some form of UBI, the abolishment of the health insurance industry (this one may be true actually) or even farther left ideas than that, no one there is hard left. I don't want all of these necessarily, but these are progressive/dem socialist ideas. Conservatives describe any Dem as hard left, when most establishment liberals like you are describing are simply center left or even center right types. Wagging their finger at Trump, trotting out some means-tested BS tax credit or wishing the Republican tax cut a few years ago fell a few % points higher is not "hard left".
 
Again, I am what you would consider "hard left". Unless they're on there fighting for things like democratic socialism, reparations, the Green New Deal, the end of globalization, ending all college debt, the slashing of our military by half or more, the legalization or all drugs, some form of UBI, the abolishment of the health insurance industry (this one may be true actually) or even farther left ideas than that, no one there is hard left. I don't want all of these necessarily, but these are progressive/dem socialist ideas. Conservatives describe any Dem as hard left, when most establishment liberals like you are describing are simply center left or even center right types. Wagging their finger at Trump, trotting out some means-tested BS tax credit or wishing the Republican tax cut a few years ago fell a few % points higher is not "hard left".

You have to read the Star-Ledger/NJ.com editorials. That’s where they are at.

Another thing that they do is ignore, or really, really avoid certain issues, like the Biden “You ain’t black” thing last week. Also when the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the Bridgegate convictions because of the misuse of the law to prosecute. The key in that was the 9-0 vote. Too often they are silent, or at least very, very quiet, when news narrative isn’t in their favor. Sometimes the things you don’t say are more glaring than the things that you do opine on. That’s true for media on all sides.That’s often the deal with their stuff. Another example was when the state settled for $1 million worth of taxpayer dollars for Murphy’s guy Alvarez to settle with the campaign worker who claimed she was sexually assaulted. Conversely, they’ll cherry pick national issues like they did recently when Wisconsin insisted on an in-person primary vote. That’s certainly suitable for a national publication like the N.Y. Times or Washington Post, but there’s really no reason for it to be in a local paper in New Jersey, especially when we are in the midst of a pandemic affecting OUR state, unless you are pushing an agenda (which Whitmer himself admitted their editorials do in that piece he wrote). But the most puzzling thing is that if you are resorting to asking readers for donations because business is so bad, why turn off so many of them with your content? It’s not the smartest tactic when you are trying to survive.

An area where they’ll say they are more centrist is when it comes to New Jersey politics, especially NJ Democratic Party politics. There’s a lot of friction with the Murphy camp and the Sweeney/Norcross crowd to the South and the Adubato/DiVincenzo faction in the North. The Ledger is strongly anti-Norcross and DiVincenzo, and as much as they want to constantly side with Murphy, he makes it tough for them because his lack of governing experience is often apparent, and it will show in how they editorialize it. But that’s more politics, and specifically down and dirty NJ politics, than it is core beliefs.
 
Last edited:
You have to read the Star-Ledger/NJ.com editorials. That’s where they are at.

Another thing that they do is ignore, or really, really avoid certain issues, like the Biden “You ain’t black” thing last week. Also when the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the Bridgegate convictions because of the misuse of the law to prosecute. The key in that was the 9-0 vote. Too often they are silent, or at least very, very quiet, when news narrative isn’t in their favor. Sometimes the things you don’t say are more glaring than the things that you do opine on. That’s true for media on all sides.That’s often the deal with their stuff. Another example was when the state settled for $1 million worth of taxpayer dollars for Murphy’s guy Alvarez to settle with the campaign worker who claimed she was sexually assaulted. Conversely, they’ll cherry pick national issues like they did recently when Wisconsin insisted on an in-person primary vote. That’s certainly suitable for a national publication like the N.Y. Times or Washington Post, but there’s really no reason for it to be in a local paper in New Jersey, especially when we are in the midst of a pandemic affecting OUR state, unless you are pushing an agenda (which Whitmer himself admitted their editorials do in that piece he wrote). But the most puzzling thing is that if you are resorting to asking readers for donations because business is so bad, why turn off so many of them with your content? It’s not the smartest tactic when you are trying to survive.

An area where they’ll say they are more centrist is when it comes to New Jersey politics, especially NJ Democratic Party politics. There’s a lot of friction with the Murphy camp and the Sweeney/Norcross crowd to the South and the Adubato/DiVincenzo faction in the North. The Ledger is strongly anti-Norcross and DiVincenzo, and as much as they want to constantly side with Murphy, he makes it tough for them because his lack of governing experience is often apparent, and it will show in how they editorialize it. But that’s more politics, and specifically down and dirty NJ politics, than it is core beliefs.
Plain and simple, they kiss Murphy"s ass & they believe we should too--
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT