ADVERTISEMENT

The epitome of ridiculousness

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
190,638
106,759
113
Tell me again why this game decides home field advantage in the WS!

MLB gets what it deserves....




Royals on pace to have eight All-Star starters, thanks to fan voting

The AL All-Star starting lineup very well may be the Kansas City Royals plus Mike Trout.

Major League Baseball is truly facing a Royal problem as the Midsummer Classic approaches.

If the 2015 MLB All-Star Game voting ballots closed today and the roster secured, the National League would basically face the Kansas City Royals starting lineup, plus Mike Trout.

Every Royals starter but Alex Rios is in the lead in their respective position categories-Rios is currently ranked fourth among outfielders despite a sub-.200 batting average. If the current leading vote-getters remain atop the hill, eight starters from one team will be a record for the All-Star Game.

There's no doubt that Royals players such as Mike Moustakas, who is fifth in the AL in batting average (.318), Kendrys Morales, who is fifth in the AL in RBIs (41), Eric Hosmer and Salvador Perez deserve some recognition, but some of the other leading vote-getters are laughable.

Royals second baseman Omar Infante is the leader at his position despite having the lowest OPS (.496) in the majors among qualified players and sporting a lowly .204 batting average. Alcides Escobar, who is currently hitting .255 with a .285 on-base percentage, leads all shortstop, ahead of Detroit's Jose Iglesias (.355 batting average) and Toronto's Jose Reyes (.300 batting average).

Royals manager Ned Yost told USA Today Sports, "there's nothing wrong," and that if fans don't like it they need to get out and vote, just as loyal Royals fans have already done-and may likely continue to do-this season.

"Vote!" Yost told USA Today Sports. "The votes are the votes. If you don't like it, go out there and vote. Our fans have gotten out and voted.

"Does seven starters surprise you? Yeah. But once you sit back and think about it, it's really not that surprising.''

Yost's challenge is a bit of a long shot for baseball fans who may want to right the ship. As it stands, Infante is 200,000 votes shy of having more votes than Jason Kipnis, Ian Kinsler and Dustin Pedroia combined and has jumped 300,000 votes ahead of Houston's Jose Altuve.

Most of the Royals either don't seem to mind or simply don't care that the ballot looks like it does with three weeks left until voting closes, but to their credit, they are in the middle of a race for the AL central division and have other things to worry about.

"I don't know what people want us to do,'' Hosmer told USA Today Sports. "Are we supposed to tell people to stop voting for us?"

Royals outfielder Alex Gordan didn't disagree with the state of the ballot but acknowledged that there is a problem with voting system and that it may take eight Royals being named to the AL starting lineup to spur the league to make a change.

"To be honest with you, I've never agreed with the All-Star voting," Gordon told USA Today Sports. "I always thought that guys most deserving, and having the best years, should go, especially now that the All-Star Game decides who wins home-field advantage. But it's a popularity thing now, and after getting to the World Series, we got popular.

"But we get seven guys starting at the All-Star Game, they'll change the rule. They'll have to. It will be like a home game. Nobody wants to see one team playing against the other All-Star team. It kind of ruins the point of an All-Star Game."

The last time a ballot issue came up was in 1957 when seven Cincinnati Reds players were named to the NL all-star team after the Cincinnati Inquirer distributed pre-marked ballots in the Sunday editions of the paper. It's only fitting that another ballot stuffing issue arises when this year's All-Star Game is in Cincinnati.

The current record for players from the same team starting at All-Star Game was in 1939 when six players from the New York Yankees started the game, but five of those players were also voted into the Hall of Fame.


http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/royals-pace-all-star-starters-article-1.2259101
 
This would be funny if the game didn't have impact on World Series home teams....
 
I'm disappointed that my Royals haven't locked up the pennant yet or all the spots on the all star team. That will happen soon.
 
Royals scrub could be benched — then start All-Star Game
By Zach Braziller

June 16, 2015 | 12:07pm

omarinfante.jpg

Omar Infante of the Kansas City Royals leads American League All-Star voting at second base. Photo: Getty Images

OMAR INFANTE COULD BE THE WORST PLAYER EVER TO START AN ALL STAR GAME. And he might get benched before then.

The Royals second baseman, leading the vote despite putrid numbers because of the overzealous fan base’s bulk voting, could lose his hold on his lineup spot if his struggles continue, the Kansas City Star suggested.

The numbers are ugly: .210 batting average, .210 on-base percentage, no home runs, no stolen bases. Infante is last in baseball in OPS (.511) among players with at least 190 plate appearances. Yet he’s one of eight Royals in line to start the All-Star Game (Mike Trout’s the only non-Royals starter).

“What do they have a virus in the computer? There’s got to be,” cracked Orioles manager Buck Showalter, according to CSN Baltimore. “Infante is the eighth [All-Star]? What’s he hitting .204? He must be having a heck of a defensive year.”

There are several more deserving second baseman in the American League, by the numbers, particularly Astros star Jose Altuve, who is hitting .290 with five home runs and 27 RBIs.

“I know I don’t have the numbers,” Infante said. “But I don’t have control over that. The fans voted for me. I appreciate that.”

At the moment, manager Ned Yost is sticking with Infante over utility man Christian Colon. Top prospect Raul Mondesi Jr. could be an option, and the Royals may explore trade possibilities.

For now, Infante is the starter – and may wind up introduced with the starters at the All-Star Game in Cincinnati on July 14.

“If I go, I’ll go,” Infante said. “I don’t complain about that. If I don’t go, that’s good, because I don’t have a good enough season to go to the All-Star Game. That’s why I don’t have to feel bad. I think I have to keep working, keep playing hard, and we’ll see.”

http://nypost.com/2015/06/16/royals-scrub-could-be-benched-then-start-all-star-game/
 
Tell me again why this game decides home field advantage in the WS!

MLB gets what it deserves....

Bingo. An idiotic policy since it was put in place. It's been only a matter of time before it would prove a source of embarrassment. Lets hope the new commish does the right thing and lets all those Royals play, and then change the policy next year.

We all realize that National League fans are now all voting for the Royals too, right? And I can't blame them since, as a Yankee fan, I've been voting for undeserved starters in the NL since they came up with the stupid idea of making this exhibition game actually worth something.
 
Hate this because it's going to reward mediocrity and punish many deserving players. Some of whom might be making their first appearance with nothing guaranteed in the future.

This should never have become a popularity contest. Let those that know what they're doing with as little of an agenda as possible do the voting.
 
Wasn't home field advantage for the World Series alternating seasons, so that the team with the best record may not have gotten home field if it wasn't "their year"?

If alternating years (and not the best record ) is the alternative, having the All-Star game decide home field is fine by me.
 
Another Selig brain child. Amazing the damage he did to the game but because TV contracts and overall revenues got so high under his watch he never got the criticism he deserved IMO. He tried to contract the Twins for eff's sake, who just so happened to be the closest market to the team his family (he) owned.
 
Hate this because it's going to reward mediocrity and punish many deserving players. Some of whom might be making their first appearance with nothing guaranteed in the future.

This should never have become a popularity contest. Let those that know what they're doing with as little of an agenda as possible do the voting.
Agree. If I'm managing the AL team and have to start Infante, or any of the other less deserving Royals, I'm pulling them after the 1st out. Problem is Ned Yost will be managing so it's not going to be that easy. Tough spot for him.
 
And when those Royals give the AL the lead and the rest of the "all stars" blow it that will really be interesting reading.:)
 
Agree. If I'm managing the AL team and have to start Infante, or any of the other less deserving Royals, I'm pulling them after the 1st out. Problem is Ned Yost will be managing so it's not going to be that easy. Tough spot for him.
Yost is saying most all the right things but I have no doubt he knows the voting is a farce.

His comments, which I don't for a moment think he believes, that the voting shows who the public wants to see is comical.

Like I said, I hope this continues and forces the commissioner to both change the voting rules and the importance of the All Star game result.
 
60 million All-Star ballots disallowed, but not those Royals ones

By Jonathan Lehman

royalsballots.jpg

Alcides Escobar and Omar Infante (right) of the Kansas City Royals are in line to start the All-Star Game, but an MLB exec insists fan voting is up to code. Photo: AP

Eric Hosmer over Miguel Cabrera. Nori Aoki over Giancarlo Stanton. Omar Infante over anyone.

How? Why? With illogical results such as these at the online ballot box for the MLB All-Star Game, suspicions are swirling over whether zealous fans — Royals fans, in particular, with Kansas City players (including Hosmer and Infante) holding eight of the nine starting spots in the American League — have found a way to circumvent voting limits.

Not so, says Bob Bowman, the CEO of MLB Advanced Media, who insists the league’s digital security measures are working — and millions of junk votes have been thrown out.

“I’m not saying we bat 1.000,” Bowman told Yahoo Sports. “But it’s between 60 and 65 million votes that have been canceled. We don’t really trumpet it because if someone thinks they’re getting away with it, they’ll try to again.”

Bowman expanded on his explanation to Fox Sports, insisting the Royals-heavy results are kosher. He said the 20 percent of voted found to be improper and removed from the count is completely in line with previous years, when some paper ballots still were in circulation.

“While some will have hard time comprehending that, we’ve seen no radically new efforts to vote beyond limit of 35 per person,” Bowman told the website. “Overzealous voters always try to game the system, (but) no more so this year than last.”
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT