He definitely gates credit for that. Does he also get blame for continuing to support Pakistan even thought they've been harboring these types?Originally posted by SnakeTom:
I assume that even his critics here will have to give the President credit for going after terrorist leaders regardless of where they are hiding.
Tom K
Originally posted by HALL85:
I assume that even his supporters will also have to admit he screwed up royally with his healthcare reform bill regardless of how he continues to stand by it.... He does get credit for sure, but how much? Several of these leaders were killed or captured by the Marines under Bush as well. Does the President get extra credit because the Marines were able to execute on a certain target? Does a President of a company take credit for a customer sale even if he wasn't directly involved in it?
This post was edited on 9/30 12:58 PM by HALL85
Originally posted by HALL85:
Calm down...I said he should get credit. I questioned how much.
Is there a problem putting something in perspective? The problem is people like you like to label others based on their opinions about one thing. Obama has done a lousy job IMO...so that means I'm polarizing??? Haven't I been constantly critical of both the Republican and Democratic Congress; I didn't vote for Christie, but I guess those facts wouldn't support your point of view. Polarizing?? I think you need to look in the mirror. Try to be objective sometimes.
This post was edited on 9/30 5:06 PM by HALL85
I criticize both parties, but if I happen to believe in more of the conservative principals, that's polarizing....I get it. Who was the last non-Democrat you voted for Mr. Objective?Originally posted by shu09:
Originally posted by HALL85:
Calm down...I said he should get credit. I questioned how much.
Is there a problem putting something in perspective? The problem is people like you like to label others based on their opinions about one thing. Obama has done a lousy job IMO...so that means I'm polarizing??? Haven't I been constantly critical of both the Republican and Democratic Congress; I didn't vote for Christie, but I guess those facts wouldn't support your point of view. Polarizing?? I think you need to look in the mirror. Try to be objective sometimes.
This post was edited on 9/30 5:06 PM by HALL85
You polarized it because you turned Tom's post into political posturing on your part, twisting the argument around to fit your agenda. That's been your playbook on these boards for a very long time. We get it, you don't like the health care law.
Your criticism here has always leaned against the left much more so than the right.
I am always objective. I voted for him but there are many things I don't like about him. I am not a blind follower.
Originally posted by HALL85:
And Tom, you just proved once again that you are a hipocrite. You ask a question, not because you care about the answer, but to prove a point about how either I or Steve feel. Try to be transparent when you ask a question next time.
You obviously can't read, since I did give him credit. Keep labeling people like your buddy 09...that does a lot to eliminate the polarization.
Guilty as charged. Compromise leads to bad government/legislation. Follow the Constitution.Originally posted by SnakeTom:
It seems that both you band SPK live in a black and white world where everything & everyone is either 100% good or 100% bad. But that is not reality.
Tom K
And had been denigrated by Obama in the past as well.Originally posted by PiratePride:
Ironically, the only successes that Obama has had have been due to the excellent execution of the missions by the US military. That same military that is in danger of being severely weakened if Obama's budget people have their way.
Originally posted by PiratePride:
Ironically, the only successes that Obama has had have been due to the excellent execution of the missions by the US military. That same military that is in danger of being severely weakened if Obama's budget people have their way.
Never said obliterated but rather really reformed. Social security should be turned into tangible, fungible retirement accounts and not stay as a giant Ponzi scheme used for general spending purposes. And military spending should be cut as well (not defense spending, there is a difference). No need to have bases in 130 countries and fund other nations' defenses.Originally posted by SnakeTom:
Originally posted by PiratePride:
Ironically, the only successes that Obama has had have been due to the excellent execution of the missions by the US military. That same military that is in danger of being severely weakened if Obama's budget people have their way.
You can't have it both ways Pride. You can't cut the defecit without cuts in the military budget. Unless of course you agree with SPK that Social Security & Medicare be obliterated.
TK
Originally posted by SnakeTom:
Originally posted by PiratePride:
Ironically, the only successes that Obama has had have been due to the excellent execution of the missions by the US military. That same military that is in danger of being severely weakened if Obama's budget people have their way.
You can't have it both ways Pride. You can't cut the defecit without cuts in the military budget. Unless of course you agree with SPK that Social Security & Medicare be obliterated.
TK