Whenever we lose it's Willard's fault. I don't know how last night can be blamed on Willard, especially when your opponent is exclaiming in their huddle, "They don't want to guard."
Whenever we lose it's Willard's fault. I don't know how last night can be blamed on Willard, especially when your opponent is exclaiming in their huddle, "They don't want to guard."
Part of the game is motivating your kids to play their best. If you see 5 minutes of unfocused play, you adjust..
If your game strategy isn't working, and you can't motivate your team, you got outcoached. (Or the other team has superior athletes, which I absolutely do not think is true in this case). One of the things that people talk about when they talk about great coaches is who can squeeze the most out of their team based on the talent. Who can elevate? Who can coach up?
To listen to you, one would think it was a team of horses that just needs to be whipped. That's not what sports is.
I would say that Dunham and Martin were superior to most players on our roster. Jones is a crafty veteran, and has torched us more than once. If you can't concede that a team has better players, it's always going to be the coach's fault.
To listen to you, one would think it was a team of horses that just needs to be whipped. That's not what sports is.
I would say that Dunham and Martin were superior to most players on our roster. Jones is a crafty veteran,
We would have been run off the court had Whitehead not played like a pro. Butler is good, but not that good. The team simply was not ready to play. Who is that on? I know the players bear a great deal of responsibility. But they didn't know how to defend Dunham, et al. They needed a strategy and adjustments and obviously did not have them. I do not want to hear, at the conclusion of a three-game homestand, that they are tired. The team that traveled from Indiana in the freezing cold looked fresh.Whenever we lose it's Willard's fault. I don't know how last night can be blamed on Willard, especially when your opponent is exclaiming in their huddle, "They don't want to guard."
I don't understand how a coach that has gotten these kids to play so hard all of a sudden didn't get them ready last night. Did he tell them to not play so hard? I think IW'S commen about how practice is gonna be brutal with us going over defense constantly, and Derrick's despondency over the loss tell the story of who the players blame.We would have been run off the court had Whitehead not played like a pro. Butler is good, but not that good. The team simply was not ready to play. Who is that on? I know the players bear a great deal of responsibility. But they didn't know how to defend Dunham, et al. They needed a strategy and adjustments and obviously did not have them. I do not want to hear, at the conclusion of a three-game homestand that they are tired. The team that traveled from Indiana in the freezing cold looked fresh.
Getting a team motivated is also part of coaching.
Based on this it sounds like every loss in the country every night is the coaches fault?The coach is the CEO of the team. His team. His recruits. His strategy. His in-game coaching. His responsibility. Don't want to be accountable for on-court results, get out of high-level coaching.
Part of the game is motivating your kids to play their best. If you see 5 minutes of unfocused play, you adjust.
Part of the game is strategy and opposition research. If you see that the other team is getting anything they want from anywhere they want, you adjust.
If your game strategy isn't working, and you can't motivate your team, you got outcoached. (Or the other team has superior athletes, which I absolutely do not think is true in this case). One of the things that people talk about when they talk about great coaches is who can squeeze the most out of their team based on the talent. Who can elevate? Who can coach up?
Last night I saw an unfocused team, but I also saw no real strategy to counter Butler. I saw no offensive scheme to break them packing the paint. Either way Holtmann got a lot out of his kids last night, and we didn't.
Excellent post shu09.Guys, it's okay to say Willard has been great this season. He has. It's also okay to say he didn't have a great night last night. He didn't.
The good has far outweighed the bad from Willard this season. I didn't think we were focused last night and we didn't make many in-game adjustments (there were a few, but not enough).
I trust him to make the necessary adjustments next time and get the team back on the right track starting next week. He has proven he can do it in multiple instances this season. Just move on from this game. Disappointing that we didn't rise up and put some distance between us and the middle of the pack in this conference, but it's not a killer loss. Butler is a good team.
Funny you should say that Dick. Usually i feel the vib when Tim McCloone announces the players. But last night there was no energy in the environment.If you saw the first CU game, you would think we could play 8 guys, and Watson would tell us what he was going to do, and we still couldn't stop him. But in the second game, he wasn't a factor. So I can hope...
In recent games, you could feel the energy, last night it was clear is was missing.
We are not their best win to date. They beat Cincinnati on the road. They beat Purdue on the road. Yes, they lost some conf games early but of that was due in part to injury to their point guard and a shooting slump by Dunham who went several straight games without hitting a 3. We didn't play great, Butler shot 56%, and it was a 2 point game with 30 seconds left. Disappointing loss? Yes. But we're not going to win every game. Six to go, let's see how they respond.I'm not sure why you would think that. I made no references to horse racing and that isn't even a team sport or one with a similar coach-player dynamic. College basketball is very coaching-centered. It absolutely means a lot who is on the sidelines, what they say, and what kind of culture and skills they've imparted to their players. I'm fine with letting others decide whether I was comparing our situation to whipping horses.
That's a fair point. I shouldn't make the statement about comparing talent universally. Sophomore Khadeen or IW isn't Senior Dunham. That's a bad match up for us. Martin has greatly improved and won the war last night against Desi. Jones is good no doubt. However, we've got plenty of top level talent in Delgado, IW, KC, and Desi to make it a horse race. This Butler team lost to Marquette and Creighton this season. It's not like they are a juggernaut. We are their best win to date. More important to me is that they looked in control. They got any shot they wanted on the court. Our offense looked lost and was heavily reliant on popping the three after a pick, or running the lane into three guys. We looked like the worse team and it wasn't close.
We definitely did not have much of a home court advantage. But the geniuses working at our university and in the Big East should not schedule games on days that are holy days for Catholics. Yes, it is true that not everyone is a practicing Catholic and many fans may be of other religions. But a lot of our season ticket holders are older folks who are into their faith. The 6:30 start on Ash Wednesday of all days: genius move.We are not their best win to date. They beat Cincinnati on the road. They beat Purdue on the road. Yes, they lost some conf games early but of that was due in part to injury to their point guard and a shooting slump by Dunham who went several straight games without hitting a 3. We didn't play great, Butler shot 56%, and it was a 2 point game with 30 seconds left. Disappointing loss? Yes. But we're not going to win every game. Six to go, let's see how they respond.
I sincerely hope that all these critics were at the game. Attendance was poor and it did not help the team to come out of the runway to a virtually empty arena. Home court advantage? We didn't have it for the Butler game.
1st sacrifice of lent should have been make the 7am mass so you could make the gameWe definitely did not have much of a home court advantage. But the geniuses working at our university and in the Big East should not schedule games on days that are holy days for Catholics. Yes, it is true that not everyone is a practicing Catholic and many fans may be of other religions. But a lot of our season ticket holders are older folks who are into their faith. The 6:30 start on Ash Wednesday of all days: genius move.
It definitely was a factor. But let's look at the other factor: In a metro area where rush hour begins at 4pm (sometimes even 3pm) and the traffic is horrible, 6:30pm starts do not work. Maybe in Omaha or Indianapolis they work, but not here. And, yes these are excuses but what is left of our fan base after sustained losing for so many years, needs to be motivated. The team wasn't up for the game either. When a team starts winning consistently, no matter what the conditions are, then fans start to show up in larger and larger numbers.Anyone ever hear of separation if church and state. This is the first time I've heard this as an excuse for poor attendance at a sporting event. Sad excuse. Forgive me father for I'm a sinner for believing this.
All a coach can do is put his team in a position to win & it's up to the players to get it done.
Anyone ever hear of separation if church and state. This is the first time I've heard this as an excuse for poor attendance at a sporting event. Sad excuse. Forgive me father for I'm a sinner for believing this.
Can't believe we're still talking about Ash Wednesday. Our team is 17-7, 7-5 with two huge home games coming up. Stop the BS. Just get to the games.