ADVERTISEMENT

Which new rule....

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
190,638
106,759
113
......do you like the most for next season re college BB?

Which if any do you not like?

1. Shot clock reduced to 30 seconds
2. One less timeout plus no live timeouts by the coach
3. No resetting of the 10 second backcourt rule
4. Four foot (from three) arc under the basket
5. No more closely guarded 5 second rule
6. Combining a timeout with a media timeout if they are within 30 seconds of each other
7. Use of replay reviews for potential shot clock violations on made baskets throughout the game
8. One shot technical foul instead of two for hanging on the rim or delay of game infractions
9. Allowing dunking in warmups
 
Anything to reduce stoppages and watching players stand around in a huddle (i.e. #2 and #6) will be good for the game.

There's nothing that I don't really like, but a bunch of them I have no opinion on. For example, #9 - who cares either way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheAdrinator
So many to like, but if I had to choose one, I would say #2. Reforming the timeout rules is the best thing the rules committee has done in a long time.

I don't like #8 because it just gives another reason for players to commit delay of game infractions. Refs rarely call it and give way too many warnings (one warning per team is the rule). Now, the punishment is less severe.
 
My favorite new rule is the no resetting the 10 second back court violation.

Another rule that I'd be in favor of is putting a limit on how long refs can review a call. I like the review of shot clock violations being added, but I don't want it and other stoppages to slow the game down too much. Give them a time limit or a views limit or something. If you can't tell after 30 seconds what happened then it's not incontrovertible evidence and the call on the court stands.
 
There's nothing that I don't really like, but a bunch of them I have no opinion on. For example, #9 - who cares either way?
That's being done with the thought to get fans in seats earlier and not have them sitting at or just after the opening tip.
 
Another rule that I'd be in favor of is putting a limit on how long refs can review a call. I like the review of shot clock violations being added, but I don't want it and other stoppages to slow the game down too much. Give them a time limit or a views limit or something. If you can't tell after 30 seconds what happened then it's not incontrovertible evidence and the call on the court stands.

That's a key point to me. The constant 'going to the monitor reviews' that takes way too much time and interferes with the flow of the game.
 
2 and 3 for me. A little less over coaching and reward the defense for not getting the ball over the half court line without allowing a time out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pirate6711
......do you like the most for next season re college BB?

Which if any do you not like?

1. Shot clock reduced to 30 seconds
2. One less timeout plus no live timeouts by the coach
3. No resetting of the 10 second backcourt rule
4. Four foot (from three) arc under the basket
5. No more closely guarded 5 second rule
6. Combining a timeout with a media timeout if they are within 30 seconds of each other
7. Use of replay reviews for potential shot clock violations on made baskets throughout the game
8. One shot technical foul instead of two for hanging on the rim or delay of game infractions
9. Allowing dunking in warmups

I like most of the new rules, but #3 is the best one to me. #2 is a close second. #5 is the worst of the rule changes.
 
......do you like the most for next season re college BB?

Which if any do you not like?

1. Shot clock reduced to 30 seconds
2. One less timeout plus no live timeouts by the coach
3. No resetting of the 10 second backcourt rule
4. Four foot (from three) arc under the basket
5. No more closely guarded 5 second rule
6. Combining a timeout with a media timeout if they are within 30 seconds of each other
7. Use of replay reviews for potential shot clock violations on made baskets throughout the game
8. One shot technical foul instead of two for hanging on the rim or delay of game infractions
9. Allowing dunking in warmups

Don't like number six because of the time sequence. I would have made it within one minute of each other not 30 seconds .
 
That's a key point to me. The constant 'going to the monitor reviews' that takes way too much time and interferes with the flow of the game.
Yes, reviews take too long. TOs and fouls at games end take too much time. But I don't think this will impact that much. I like the no reset rule the most but don't think it is a huge thing, just a correction of an obvious wrong.

No one likes this, but imo, if you are under the foul limit and get fouled in the last 2 minutes, you have the option of either shooting the fouls or taking the ball out. This rewards teams for not fouling. As it stands, you actually get penalized if you haven't reached the foul limit, and are losing a close game. And nothing makes a game drag more than 50 fts in the last 2 minutes. And breaking a rule should not be your best way to get into the game. It is like a defense in fb gettin a benefit from holding. Even the dopey NFL changed their rules so you cannot use penalties to your strategic advantage.
 
Rules Changes Coming to Men's Hoops in 2015-16

Head Coach Eddie Jordan a fan of new rules changes

June 10, 2015

11145844.jpeg


By Tom Luicci
ScarletKnights.com


PISCATAWAY, N.J. -- The recurring image Eddie Jordan still has from last college basketball season is watching Rutgers play solid, energized defense for 20 to 25 seconds -- only to realize it had to do so for another 10 to 15 more.

So count the Scarlet Knights' head coach as a fan of the sport's biggest rule change for 2015-2016, when the shot clock will be reduced from 35 seconds to 30.

"I like the 30-second clock. Thirty-five seconds just felt too long, especially for your defense to dig in for," he said. "That's the impression I've had. Obviously, I'm coming from the NBA (which has a 24-second shot clock) for over 20 years and I come in and the first year I'm saying `we are defending our butts off. We're going to get a stop here.'

Then I look up and there are still 10 or 15 seconds left on the shot clock."How can you keep defending ball movement, ball movement and more ball movement for that long?

Or even people just trying to get to the basket? You stop them, you close them out, you stop again, you stop again, you're staying in front of people, you're rotating, and there are still 10 or 15 seconds left on the shot clock.

That just didn't seem right to me. You penalize the defense by asking them to guard for that long."In general, Jordan says he favors almost all of the significant rule changes that will be in effect for the coming season.

Beyond the reduction in the shot clock -- the first change there since it went from 45 seconds to 35 for the 1993-94 season -- there are handful of other changes that will have a significant impact on the sport, which is looking to prop up the pace of play.

Those include the elimination of the closely-guarded five-second rule; expanding the restricted arc area under the basket from three feet to four; allowing a total of 10 seconds (eliminating most reasons for a re-set of the time) to advance the ball to the frontcourt; taking away one timeout and prohibiting coaches from calling a timeout when the ball is live (only players will be allowed to do so in those situations).

The biggest cosmetic change is removing the prohibition on dunking during pre-game warmups and at halftime."I like the elimination of the five-second closely-guarded rule," Jordan said. "I could never figure out when and where it started. It was too discretionary to me. It was hard to tell when it started and stopped.

But we didn't see a lot of that this year because the game has move to more pick and rolls."The Scarlet Knights' third-year coach said extending the restricted arc a foot, bringing it in line with the NBA, "will be an adjustment.

""You've got to be quick to come from your weak side over to the strong side and be another foot out to get a charge," he said. "And with this new charge call they're saying if the guy is already in motion then you can't take a charge.

They did that last year. This year they added the four-foot circle. So it's a double whammy. You really have to get out and establish your position.

"Overall, I like the majority of the rule changes -- the shot clock, the five-second change, the 10-second limit in the backcourt. I love that.

If you get a deflection and there's eight seconds left it stays there. It doesn't re-set at 10 seconds, with only a few exceptions."As a team, we'll adjust to the rules, just like everyone else. With our new guards we'll be able to get the ball up the court quick enough. With our full court pressure defense maybe we'll turn the ball over more."Jordan said he is pleased what he has seen during team workouts, although he is eager to have freshmen newcomers Corey Sanders and Jonathan Laurent and junior college transfer DeShawn Freeman added to the mix.

"We're still waiting for some new players to come in and get involved," Jordan said. "(Kansa State transfer) Nigel Johnson (a guard sitting out) looks great. I like the way Nigel looks. (Redshirt freshman guard) Justin Goode looks good. It's just a matter of getting all the pieces together in one place."
 
Anything to reduce stoppages and watching players stand around in a huddle (i.e. #2 and #6) will be good for the game.

There's nothing that I don't really like, but a bunch of them I have no opinion on. For example, #9 - who cares either way?


Agreed 100%
 
I don't have a problem with any of them. I do have a prediction, though. Seton Hall will be the first team to lose a player for multiple games due to injuring himself while dunking during warm-ups. This will be a catastrophic injury that causes a once-promising season to spiral downward.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT