A few things about Nick Werkman. First those shooting percentages were very good for his era. Secondly he scored about 80% of his baskets in the paint, Every team played a box and one on him with the whole D collapsing on him once he got the ball. He had tremendous moves and was constantly drawing fouls, Consider all those points & rebounds in the paint and realize that he was only 6-3 playing and scoring at will at & around the basket. Also Freshmen were not eligible back then so he probably scores 3000 + pints if he had that extra year. And by the way he did average over 30 PPG on the freshman team also.
Tom K
This is my understanding of how Nick played. Most of his points came in the paint which means not having a three-point line didn't affect his game and scoring much.
Agree that those shooting percentages were probably good especially for the time though I haven't really researched it.
Tom, you're one of the few here who saw Nick play. Is my presumption that the level of competition was down from the best teams of the earlier years and the Big East era on the mark? I know that was the period after the point shaving scandal which certainly affected how the University saw the basketball team.