...but you can suck!When you have no teeth you can't bite.
NCAA President Charlie Baker
Multi-year NIL deals.
Sad that an organizations launched to help protect the health of amateur athletes has been eviscerated by the free market and greed and those with no regard for the schools, common sense, education, etc.When you have no teeth you can't bite.
NCAA President Charlie Baker
But it's run by the schools.Sad that an organizations launched to help protect the health of amateur athletes has been eviscerated by the free market and greed and those with no regard for the schools, common sense, education, etc.
That is what everyone keeps missing. The schools if they could ever get together could put a stop to this as long as the players get paid. It won't be easy but the schools agree to the NCAA rules then some of them lobby their local politicians and get the rules changed so it will benefit their schools or conferences. It's worse than Congress if that is even possible.But it's run by the schools.
And the schools are only furthering and encouraging this with supporting pay-for-play collectives. Yes, they are not "associated" with the schools, but most every question posted to Mcbride is about NIL.But it's run by the schools.
Agree, the schools pay the freight, but the lawsuits and bills incurred by the NCAA by these antitrust have been enormous. It's a no win at this point unless the schools band together with some top legal minds and come up with a great counter to all of this.But it's run by the schools.
Yes, they are in a catch-22. The revenue sports contribute to and support to all other sports along with Pirate Blue and other donations. So of course you need drive this current engine until something g changes.And the schools are only furthering and encouraging this with supporting pay-for-play collectives. Yes, they are not "associated" with the schools, but most every question posted to Mcbride is about NIL.
the donors, don't want to put money into a one year guy unless he goes nba. the fans don't wanna pay money for guys that are leaving after the season.The only way to restore order is the NIL deals, ironically. The transfer stuff is worse than the money IMO.
That won't work. Coaches have multi year contracts and leave all the time.Multi-year NIL deals.
I believe the proposed rules forbid in season transfers.Sounds like winter break transfers will become common. Top players who are on bad teams can move to higher ranked teams. And coaches can fill holes mid season.
The inmates are about to be running the asylums.
Prohibiting in season transfers is unconstitutional and will be struck down by the supreme court.I believe the proposed rules forbid in season transfers.
I dont understand how that could be unconstituional. There must be a huge penumbra that that's hiding under.Prohibiting in season transfers is unconstitutional and will be struck down by the supreme court.
I just don’t see the schools banding together because they are not all aligned. The P5 state schools can operate and outlast everyone else in the short term. It’s a money grab and the rich just want a bigger piece of the pie and more control long term.Agree, the schools pay the freight, but the lawsuits and bills incurred by the NCAA by these antitrust have been enormous. It's a no win at this point unless the schools band together with some top legal minds and come up with a great counter to all of this.
I think the thought process is that there would be a buyout, similar to a coach's contract. That is what I've ssen suggested on social media.That won't work. Coaches have multi year contracts and leave all the time.
Our players aren't student athletes anymore. They are now employees of the school. SMH
They are employees of certain fan-bases too, when you consider fan-bases are being asked to pay for them, at least in part.Our players aren't student athletes anymore. They are now employees of the school. SMH
This whole thing blows my mind. You are 100% right but could you imagine had we "fired" Dawes after the fall semester?So then we or the school can fire a player who is under-performing? It works in the business world so why not in this case--it's a business & they are now employees!
If they were employees of the school things would have been much easier but the schools have avoided that for years holding onto the BS thought that they are amateur student athletes. For the money sports, they are not. The schools didn't want them to be employees and that is how we got here. The schools have mismanaged this and the NCAA is an extension of the schools. Without the schools the NCAA does not exist.Our players aren't student athletes anymore. They are now employees of the school. SMH
How about prop 48? 😂Won't they just decouple the education part from the sports part at some point? So people can continue to root for their school's team, but no one has to worry about the pretense of student-athletes and such. And I presume wouldn't have to worry about title IX and other inconvenient restrictions, either.
When you have no teeth you can't bite.
NCAA President Charlie Baker
When you have no teeth you can't bite.
NCAA President Charlie Baker