Two weeks ago, if SHU beats Nova they are most likely in, if they beat Depaul they CLINCH the NCAA"s, and how conference tournaments dont really move the needle, now that we lost all of us suddenly changed?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
13-7 in this year's big east is a pretty strong record especially coupled with decent quad one wins.I dont care 13-7 in the Big East conference is what it is
Our team does not play or exist in a vacuum. There are a dozen other teams on the bubble all doing different things -- winning and losing -- and there are also teams not even on the bubble charging in to steal bids from other bubbalicious teams.Two weeks ago, if SHU beats Nova they are most likely in, if they beat Depaul they CLINCH the NCAA"s, and how conference tournaments dont really move the needle, now that we lost all of us suddenly changed?
And what it is is just one item of data the selection committee will consider. Another is our dreadful out-of-conference showing, which also is what it is.I dont care 13-7 in the Big East conference is what it is
This is not factually correct. Shu beat miami to make the QF in the old big east east west routine and got handled by uconn...shu also had a poor ooc that year...there were no play in rounds and rpi was the net so really not a true comparisonWell in 2003 we were the first BE team that was 10-6 to be left out. We also lost in first round of BET and only had 17 wins though
Ok. That wasn’t my recollection. But I’d wager we were the first 10-6 to be left out.This is not factually correct. Shu beat miami to make the QF in the old big east east west routine and got handled by uconn...shu also had a poor ooc that year...there were no play in rounds and rpi was the net so really not a true comparison
It's unfortunate that Seton Hall only has one reporter really covering this team. People are going to take whatever he says as gospel because, well, there's nobody else to say anything else. He's the only person of any note to say Seton Hall was a lock and he's set himself up to look like a fool. They were never a lock. Anyone who seriously follows the selection process knows that. They were at one point likely and anyone saying that would have been correct. But they were absolutely, positively never a lock. Now they're not even likely. 50-50.we were a LOCK after beating nova and depaul last week suddenly no ?
That would be their ultimate prize for the season: give us a bad loss at home and have that be among the deciding factors to keep us out. Their fans would just eat that up.Let's hope that Rutgers debacle does not come back to haunt us...
Because no one really knows.I still wanna know why were all so worried when they stated beat Nova your LIKELY in, beat Depaul your IN, now we lose to SJU on their home court *when people said conference tournaments dont matter * and we suddenly are no longer in......
I think it’s all related to how “good” is that record. Meaning, as someone else has pointed out, we had basically 4 automatic wins…so that gets us to 9-7 against the “competitive “ members of the conference.if 13-7 in our conference is no good what the f is
You also beat uconn without big man and beat pc when a top 3 player is lost to injuryI think it’s all related to how “good” is that record. Meaning, as someone else has pointed out, we had basically 4 automatic wins…so that gets us to 9-7 against the “competitive “ members of the conference.
Like it or not, those are real facts.
So…we may still need some help. I think we’re still in…but…depends a lot on what happens with the other bubble teams
Clingan played half the gameYou also beat uconn without big man and beat pc when a top 3 player is lost to injury
“You”? Aren’t you a Hall fan? Shouldn’t that be “we”?You also beat uconn without big man and beat pc when a top 3 player is lost to injury
I am a supporter through an objective lens...yes games without kadary at full health and playing also are taken into account“You”? Aren’t you a Hall fan? Shouldn’t that be “we”?
But yes I get the point.
But you could cut apart a lot of games. So to get that deep is tough…you’d have to dissect everyone’s games that deep.
But I agree, it record was not as impressive as the numbers might indicate.
But will we get a bid? We’ll see.
What will we do with it? We’ll also see.
Based on our season, we were very up and down…so we’ll have to see who shows up
Because that is what fans do. Also, 95% of the projections had RU in last year so you never know. It is natural to assume worst cast scenario. I think you are in, but I don't know anything. ( well maybe more than Jerry Palm. BTW, on the RU board BAC does a really good job with this stuff.I still wanna know why were all so worried when they stated beat Nova your LIKELY in, beat Depaul your IN, now we lose to SJU on their home court *when people said conference tournaments dont matter * and we suddenly are no longer in......