ADVERTISEMENT

Memphis, Tulane, USF, UTSA commit to AAC amid Pac-12 interest

Yeah, and some indication if Gonzaga commits to PAC12 that St Mary's would also come along.

Just not seeing a huge interest in new PAC12 by TV networks/streaming services, it is basically the MWC. And now have gotten rejected by some AAC teams for now, plus getting rejected by UNLV & SJ State, so most likely the last few teams will be real stretches for football.

Still not sure why the remaining PAC12/MWC did not merge together, but like everything with college sports these days I am sure totally was about money.

Maybe I am wrong, but just not seeing the draw. of new PAC12.
While a merger would have seemed to be the most logical course of action, I'm not sure it was as simple as the two sides coming together.

As I understand it, the MWC would have had to agree to dissolve and merge into the Pac-12 -- this would have protected the NCAA credits and other financial benefits OSU and WSU accrued as the conference fell apart around them leaving them with a name and not much else.

It's unclear if the MWC would have gotten the nine votes it would have needed to dissolve or if the Pac-12 schools would have been interested in taking on all of the MWC schools. As you can see, the Pac-12 is clearly prioritizing which MWC it truly wants. Based on what I've read, it would have been much cheaper for the Pac-12 to engineer the reverse merger.

Memphis, Tulane, USF, UTSA commit to AAC amid Pac-12 interest

There was also a rumor floating around that Gonzaga was going to be a non-football member and was still going to get a full share.
Yeah, and some indication if Gonzaga commits to PAC12 that St Mary's would also come along.

Just not seeing a huge interest in new PAC12 by TV networks/streaming services, it is basically the MWC. And now have gotten rejected by some AAC teams for now, plus getting rejected by UNLV & SJ State, so most likely the last few teams will be real stretches for football.

Still not sure why the remaining PAC12/MWC did not merge together, but like everything with college sports these days I am sure totally was about money.

Maybe I am wrong, but just not seeing the draw. of new PAC12.

Carino Annual Q&A with Holloway

Something I found interesting was that it was previously reported we scheduled Fordham at Walsh due to scheduling conflicts with the Rock. However, Sha said he intentionally scheduled two games at Walsh to enhance the student game day experience. I thought that was really cool, because the NIT games at Walsh were a lot of fun.
It could have been one of the others, but the dates did/didn’t synch up

North Carolina

He doesn’t listen to anyone. He always talks about revenge but he never did.

"Doesn't listen" and being blocked are different though. Many accounts of the "guardrails" working while Trump was in office to prevent him from doing whatever he wanted. Trump didn't listen to the people telling him that the plan to overturn the election was ridiculous. Pence was the guardrail preventing from actually trying it. The guardrails are not going to be there under a 2nd term.
  • Like
Reactions: silkcitypirate

North Carolina

I'm just listening to him talk and seeing what he posts online.



This is actually a good example of what I was referring to about being less constrained. He wanted to prosecute Comey and Clinton but he was blocked by Don McGahn from going through with it. Next term, there will be no Don McGahn. Only yes men.



Sure you can make that case, but it might have something to do with the fact that he doesn't care about laws and kept breaking them.



I don't disagree. That's why I don't see her doing much. She's not going to stick her neck out on anything.
Immigration has reached a boiling point where the public is on the side of getting something done, and the tax cuts expiring seems unlikely. Outside of those two issues I don't see major policy coming.
He doesn’t listen to anyone. He always talks about revenge but he never did.

North Carolina

I see the vindictive piece as a talking point the media has made up.

I'm just listening to him talk and seeing what he posts online.

He could’ve gone after Hillary in the first term and never did. Where was he vindictive in his first term?

This is actually a good example of what I was referring to about being less constrained. He wanted to prosecute Comey and Clinton but he was blocked by Don McGahn from going through with it. Next term, there will be no Don McGahn. Only yes men.

You can make the case that Democrats went after him nonstop and haven’t let up.

Sure you can make that case, but it might have something to do with the fact that he doesn't care about laws and kept breaking them.

I have no idea what Harris will project as a president. She has zero leadership skills, and in capable of projecting any position. People like that, don’t make decisions and live in a world of paralysis.

I don't disagree. That's why I don't see her doing much. She's not going to stick her neck out on anything.
Immigration has reached a boiling point where the public is on the side of getting something done, and the tax cuts expiring seems unlikely. Outside of those two issues I don't see major policy coming.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT