ADVERTISEMENT

A blown chance

We're a suburban stepchild so we'll never "dominate." NYC media. When we are good we are covered more. When we are not, we're basically invisible.

BTW, watching Channel 11 morning news on Monday AM. Their sports report consisted of highlights of SJU being eliminated two days ago and a quick clip of the PSAL
A major issue is that the entire region is a Pro Sports Market. Way too much competition. NY itself does not have a huge SHU alumni base. People are not talking Rutgers neither on this side of the Hudson. The Hall needs a reset and infusion of talent including a star player.. Love to see a Very Good SHU team take on a Powerhouse SJU team at The Rock and MSG twice a year! That would create an amazing amount of interest.
 
IMO the parallel of SJU vs SHU are the Knicks vs Nets. And it doesn’t matter whether the Nets were in NJ or Brooklyn.

SJU and the Knicks are NYC’s team, when they are good the fans come out in droves, when they aren’t things can become dormant. But make no mistake even a glimmer of success captures the media’s attention. Felipe Lopez choosing the Johnnies, Linsanity, Melo getting them back to the playoffs for a hot minute, etc etc.

But to think a New Jersey school is going to steal the media attention away from them is ridiculous. When Seton Hall is good, they have the opportunity to recapture their own fan base and the surrounding northern NJ market.

That’s about it. You aren’t getting the causal NY basketball fan to travel to the Rock to watch a Seton Hall basketball game.
On the Nets, I remember wondering if the narrative would change at all when they had the big 3 of Durant, Harden and Kyrie. I remember the J-Kidd years, and even though the Nets were going to finals and the Knicks were an absolute mess, the casual NY/NJ sports fan didn't seem to care one bit. The Knicks were still the Knicks for all their problems.

Because the NBA is a star-driven league, and with the move to Brooklyn, I thought maybe, just maybe the Nets would eat into the Knicks and alter the dynamic (however slight) by having 3 of big stars in the league in their respective primes, especially Durant and Kyrie who were insanely popular with kids.

And yet it didn't matter at all.
 
A major issue is that the entire region is a Pro Sports Market. Way too much competition. NY itself does not have a huge SHU alumni base. People are not talking Rutgers neither on this side of the Hudson. The Hall needs a reset and infusion of talent including a star player.. Love to see a Very Good SHU team take on a Powerhouse SJU team at The Rock and MSG twice a year! That would create an amazing amount of interest.
Yup. Pro sports is king and as Left pointed out, there are definite tiers. Been that way my whole life. Yanks/Mets, Giants/Jets and Knicks live on a different planet. I'm not a hockey guy, but people tell me the Rangers have some of that too. Whereas the Nets, Devils and Islanders are always levels below from an interest and fandom perspective. To be fair, I never thought SJU would be able to capture NY again like they did this year, but a big part of that is the Pitino factor. That plus winning all those games is why they were selling out the Garden and dominating coverage, which ain't easy to do for a college team in this market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYC Pirate
On the Nets, I remember wondering if the narrative would change at all when they had the big 3 of Durant, Harden and Kyrie. I remember the J-Kidd years, and even though the Nets were going to finals and the Knicks were an absolute mess, the casual NY/NJ sports fan didn't seem to care one bit. The Knicks were still the Knicks for all their problems.

Because the NBA is a star-driven league, and with the move to Brooklyn, I thought maybe, just maybe the Nets would eat into the Knicks and alter the dynamic (however slight) by having 3 of big stars in the league in their respective primes, especially Durant and Kyrie who were insanely popular with kids.

And yet it didn't matter at all.
Like us, the Nets, Devils and Islanders are basically suburban stepchildren. And that's with the Nets and Islanders playing within the five boroughs.

The Nets would never have reached Knicks status but it would have been interesting if the Durant/Kyrie/Harden trio could have lasted long enough to win a title or make a couple of deep runs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dehere23
St Johns was dead meat from the time Louie left until this year.
Not true at all...fraschilla recruiting talent just had bad incident with admin and then unm entered the picture. It was fraschilla roster with great jarvis tactics and 6 very talented guys that got very close to a final four. Jarvis was a very matter of fact type to the media that didnt really play well. Brought in some outstanding juco talent like bootsy thorton and marcus hatten....unfortunately things went sideways eventually ending with the the mid dec firing in 2003. They had won the NIT the prior season. They stubbed their toe 2000 2nd round after a great big east run.
 
Yup. Pro sports is king and as Left pointed out, there are definite tiers. Been that way my whole life. Yanks/Mets, Giants/Jets and Knicks live on a different planet. I'm not a hockey guy, but people tell me the Rangers have some of that too. Whereas the Nets, Devils and Islanders are always levels below from an interest and fandom perspective. To be fair, I never thought SJU would be able to capture NY again like they did this year, but a big part of that is the Pitino factor. That plus winning all those games is why they were selling out the Garden and dominating coverage, which ain't easy to do for a college team in this market.

As an actual hockey guy, that used to be the case with the Rangers and Devils, until the 90s and 2000s. The Devils now stand well on their own and don't get overrun in their own building when NYR come into town. They also had the back page of all the big NY newspapers when they were winning championships. It has been 22 years, though, and the Islanders lost most, if not all, of that mojo after winning 4 Cups in a row in the late 70s/early 80s.
 
Not true at all...fraschilla recruiting talent just had bad incident with admin and then unm entered the picture. It was fraschilla roster with great jarvis tactics and 6 very talented guys that got very close to a final four. Jarvis was a very matter of fact type to the media that didnt really play well. Brought in some outstanding juco talent like bootsy thorton and marcus hatten....unfortunately things went sideways eventually ending with the the mid dec firing in 2003. They had won the NIT the prior season. They stubbed their toe 2000 2nd round after a great big east run.
Fran had it going. Was shocked he left when he did. I might have known why he did when it happened but I dont remember and no longer care lol
 
Last edited:
As an actual hockey guy, that used to be the case with the Rangers and Devils, until the 90s and 2000s. The Devils now stand well on their own and don't get overrun in their own building when NYR come into town. They also had the back page of all the big NY newspapers when they were winning championships. It has been 22 years, though, and the Islanders lost most, if not all, of that mojo after winning 4 Cups in a row in the late 70s/early 80s.
The move to the prudential center and Nets leaving were milestone moments and gave the Devils a greater identity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: donnie_baseball
Fran had it going. Was shocked he left when he did. I might have known why he did when it happened but I dont remember and no longer care lol
Jarvis won big with Fran’s players as I recall, either mostly or exclusively
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT