CIA Director John Brennan

[SPK145]

pmulcahy96, you've got to chill, the language and name-calling in your posts here have been way out of line.

 

[shu09]

Kudos Rick Grenell

I saw he called out Hayden on twitter and Hayden could only resort to name calling.

 

[Merge]

You find that irrelevant? Seriously?

It is relevant and should have been looked into (which I believe it was, and they found no wrong doing?)

One issue is that the public doesn't really have an understanding of the process. After an investigation like this, how common is it that the phones would be wiped? How common is it that someone would "forget" their password to get in? Based on the list, it appears there were many phones issued to each individual. Is that standard? When that happens, is it reasonable that they wouldn't be able to log into one?

I don't wat to make excuses, it does sound fishy... I am just not in a position to understand if it is an outlier.

The reason it doesn't bother me that much is that nothing on those phones would change the facts about what happened and if they really were out to get Trump, I think it wouldn't have been that hard to figure out a way to do so.

 

[cernjSHU]

Choke on Brennan’s cock-you cite the incompetence of Washington DC

SPK is Correct . Are you a McGreevy Hershey lover ... another ****ing moron without a clue.

Im out, if I am wrong I will come back and reach out to Merge and donate to a charity of his choice. Cern must have gotten blue balls from that Christie Whitman poster on his wall.

If you noticed, I am not having any type of discourse with you. You sir, are irrelevant to any intelligent discussion. For that matter,based on your posts, you are indeed irrelevant.

 

[pmulcahy96]

Again, I have no idea what you are talking about.
You must really love to give Stetler an inch. No mention of Charity?

That report cites the intelligence assessment as they were briefed by the intelligence professionals.
Republicans and democrats all agreed with the conclusion that Russia hacked the DNC.

bi- partisan - you are really ****ing Stupid - Mr. Expert on everything.

 

[Merge]

bi- partisan - you are really ****ing Stupid - Mr. Expert on everything.

Yes. It was bipartisan as republicans and democrats agreed about the intelligence assessment that Russia hacked the DNC.

Not quite an expert on everything but I am able to have a conversation with people I disagree with.

 

[pmulcahy96]

If you noticed, I am not having any type of discourse with you. You sir, are irrelevant to any intelligent discussion. For that matter,based on your posts, you are indeed irrelevant.
YGovernor McGreevey says H

I saw he called out Hayden on twitter and Hayden could only resort to name calling.

View embedded media

to get your feet wet justthenews.com Keep digging .

 

[SHUSA]

pmulcahy sounds like a teenager in a drunken stupor. people have been banned for much less. pretty vulgar language.

im happy dan doesnt have to deal with this kind of immaturity right now. maybe @SnakeTom can clean it up.

 

[Hallsome]

Collusion is not a legal term. But to me it means working together for a common goal. The Trump campaign and the Russians were certainly doing that. What wasn't there in hard core proof, but certainly there was evidence that existed of a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians. This was no hoax. Mueller was clear that there was evidence on this. Question was whether there was enough proof for a criminal conspiracy to prove at trial. Russian collision was not a hoax at all.

Non sensical

 

[Hallsome]

pmulcahy sounds like a teenager in a drunken stupor. people have been banned for much less. pretty vulgar language.

im happy dan doesnt have to deal with this kind of immaturity right now. maybe @SnakeTom can clean it up.

Who cares what he says? He says stupid stuff so you call the hall monitor (pun somewhat intended)?

 

[SHUSA]

Who cares what he says? He says stupid stuff so you call the hall monitor (pun somewhat intended)?

ive been following this board for a while and language that vulgar is always treated the same way. im not doing anything off brand.

 

[Stevie_H]

Collusion is not a legal term. But to me it means working together for a common goal. The Trump campaign and the Russians were certainly doing that. What wasn't there in hard core proof, but certainly there was evidence that existed of a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians. This was no hoax. Mueller was clear that there was evidence on this. Question was whether there was enough proof for a criminal conspiracy to prove at trial. Russian collision was not a hoax at all.

Volume 5 of the Republican controlled Senate Intelligence Committee's Bipartisan report goes even further than the Mueller Report. It's incredibly damning. What are people still defending?

Bipartisan Senate Report Vol. 5

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/report_volume5.pdf

 

[SnakeTom]

pmulcahy sounds like a teenager in a drunken stupor. people have been banned for much less. pretty vulgar language.

im happy dan doesnt have to deal with this kind of immaturity right now. maybe @SnakeTom can clean it up.

The poster has been warned about his offensive language. Some of his posts were deleted. Lets keep the discussions civil.