Originally posted by chickenbox:
....Guess I'd rather be classless and winning than classy and losing .....
Sure. It's what we're (rightfully) saying Georgetown is doing and I imagine most would still trade their situation for ours. At the end of the day, it's a basketball contest, not an etiquette one. There have been, currently are, and will continue to be plenty of less than classy coaches and programs that win a lot of games. While given the choice to win with or without class, I'd always take the latter. But it's not job one.Originally posted by Old_alum:
Originally posted by chickenbox:
....Guess I'd rather be classless and winning than classy and losing .....
Truly??
Keep clapping. just keep clappingOriginally posted by shupat08:
Repeating the same thing in every post in every thread.
Pretty comical.
100% disagree. By uncontested you are saying it was a gimme by Georgetown. That could not have been further from the truth. The Hoyas played tough defense and Mobley eventually got behind the D for the dunk. It was not uncontested it was earned.Originally posted by shu09:
This, and that layup Mobley made to open the game was basically uncontested.Originally posted by SPK145:
While I agree Georgetown should have let Seton Hall score 2 in order to even things up, Seton Hall did score 2 on its opening possession, so what's the difference? Your last sentence is completely wrong.Originally posted by hallsoccer03:
I angling to assume Georgetown was classless on this. SHU with the. 2 points would have been down 3 with 40+ seconds left and not fouling.
This post was edited on 3/7 2:34 PM by SPK145