ADVERTISEMENT

End of Game Coaching

General_Tso

All American
Gold Member
Dec 30, 2009
3,058
4,424
113
1. I know Willard told the team to foul, but Depaul should not have got a shot up at all. We had 3 fouls to give, if we foul every 3-5 seconds we wouldnt have had to worry.

2. On the inbounds when Gordon fouled Garrett, Depaul cold not run the baseline, we should have had Anthony in front of the inbounder. That is the main reson they got a good look.
 
  • Like
Reactions: halltheway
1. I know Willard told the team to foul, but Depaul should not have got a shot up at all. We had 3 fouls to give, if we foul every 3-5 seconds we wouldnt have had to worry.

2. On the inbounds when Gordon fouled Garrett, Depaul cold not run the baseline, we should have had Anthony in front of the inbounder. That is the main reson they got a good look.
Absolutely agree we should have face guarded the in bound play
 
Does this remind anyone of last year's game against Creighton where we didn't guard the inbound play?
 
1. I know Willard told the team to foul, but Depaul should not have got a shot up at all. We had 3 fouls to give, if we foul every 3-5 seconds we wouldnt have had to worry.

2. On the inbounds when Gordon fouled Garrett, Depaul cold not run the baseline, we should have had Anthony in front of the inbounder. That is the main reson they got a good look.

Let me preface, I think Willard is doing a very good job in coaching this year, but Geral Tso is 100% correct. We had 2 fouls to give..it's not very hard to do and should have been done. Any coach would have known that...with that said, we won and that's all that matters to me.
 
I've never understood why you let the inbounder get a clean look and uncontested pass. Ever. Willard's not the only coach to drop back coverage in numbers, I just don't understand why. Rattle the play from inception.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT