
2024-25 report cards for every men's Big East team (plus a few others)
How should UConn be graded after falling short of its third straight national title? Our verdicts on each team.
Not getting an "F" means that this was a bogus rating by someone who does not know what they are doing.We got a D. How in the world was it not a F? 🤣
ESPN being kind to Bob LeyWe got a D. How in the world was it not a F? 🤣
That was the point of my post. Insane take.We lost to the eventual national champions by two points in the NCAA tournament and that's a "C" season?
Yes but think about who else you lost to.We lost to the eventual national champions by two points in the NCAA tournament and that's a "C" season?
Was that a low-key self burn?Yes but think about who else you lost to.
No doubt about it. Hopefully this year we can win one in Newark. Honestly, it's just painful to walk out of the Rock thinking "I can't believe that blanking happened again"Not really. I think it was obvious what I was referring to and it really did hurt UConn's metrics etc.. Probably hurt their seeding too.
Myron Medcalf has well established credentials.Not getting an "F" means that this was a bogus rating by someone who does not know what they are doing.
I've seen your posts. You don't have any credentials.I have better credentials!
We were at the bottom of the entire country in many key stats. We also went 1-10 against the worst BE teams plus that non-conference embarrassment.By the way if you look at every meaningful team stat for the teams in the BE conference SHU was dead last or near the bottom. Also for stats across the NCAA SHU was not looking very good. So in addition to the record being bad it goes hand in hand the stats were very bad.
So how you could not give the "F" report card seems like someone did not do their homework.
I think you'd lose that bet given the guy has covered college basketball on a national level for 15 years.Been watching, following and rooting for SHU hoops since 1963 when I attended. Not only following SHU but all of college basketball. I bet that exceeds any credentials he has by a long shot.
Just because you don't like or agree with what I have to say does not mean I have no credentials. Different views are important if we are to move forward. You should have learned this lesson in college.
You could have stopped at playing Assane Mbaye significant minutes.I think you'd lose that bet given the guy has covered college basketball on a national level for 15 years.
I value different opinions. I learned that lesson long before college.
I don't value unserious ones like saving money for three years to take a chance of winning in year four. Forget trying to sell the fans on it, try telling your coach you're essentially going to starve the program of resources for three years to take a real shot in the fourth -- only to repeat the cycle again.
What happens when one of a myriad of things occurs to derail year four? You spent three years building for that moment only to see it crash and now have to wait another three years to try again?
There is no level playing field. You are correct and it is absolutely unfair. It's also the new reality.TheHall87....... I never said starve the program. You are exaggerating. Find players who will come who are not driven by big NIL money. Recuit overseas, high school, JUCO etc.
The plan to have the smallest NIL pot in the BE every year and expect to move out of the basement by buying 1 to 3 star rated players when the competition is bringing in 3 to 5 star recruits is fantasy land. There is NO level playing field today.
Yeah, but that's exactly the point. They shouldn't be competing against UConn now. These are the guys, and the guys at a level just above this, that the Hall ought to be targeting early. Reach out to them from the get-go and talk about the role you envision for them which isn't being a depth piece with a best case scenario of getting a couple of minutes of playing time and blowouts. I have to believe that is a successful recruiting strategy. Who knows, maybe Holloway is doing that. But from the outside looking in, it does not seem like he is aggressively pursuing guys.I suspect every school is now doing this so following the UConn plan is a problem for SHU. There will be a lot of competition for "flushing" out the rosters.
It’s still hard to become we went 2-18. Unbelievable how these guys allowed the program to implode. Inexcusable professionally, but they’re running it back.
To me they have 1 year to show tangible progress in navigating this era of college basketball. If that’s not there, they all go. Shaheen too. I think he’s a good coach but I don’t think he’s a good program leader at this stage in this area at this level. The personality isn’t there nor is the recognition to delegate and find people who are good at things he’s not. This isn’t St. Peter’s and he doesn’t have the transfer blockade anymore.
I don’t expect a winning BE season with our very clear challenges. Can we get to 8-10 BE wins? Show anything? Such a low bar but progress back.
You missed my point....all the schools will be doing this. No we are not really in the same class as UConn recruiting and buying players but so are a many of our competitors in the BE and beyond. We are in the same boat and going after the same players with much of the same strategies and NIL issues. Only I think SHU maybe at a bigger disadvantage. If not than we would have found a bunch of studs already wanting to come here.Yeah, but that's exactly the point. They shouldn't be competing against UConn now. These are the guys, and the guys at a level just above this, that the Hall ought to be targeting early. Reach out to them from the get-go and talk about the role you envision for them which isn't being a depth piece with a best case scenario of getting a couple of minutes of playing time and blowouts. I have to believe that is a successful recruiting strategy. Who knows, maybe Holloway is doing that. But from the outside looking in, it does not seem like he is aggressively pursuing guys.
(typo duly noted and corrected)
I think you are missing my point. Seton needs to target at a level where they can close. I think there is I viable approach doing that.You missed my point....all the schools will be doing this. No we are not really in the same class as UConn recruiting and buying players but so are a many of our competitors in the BE and beyond. We are in the same boat and going after the same players with much of the same strategies and NIL issues. Only I think SHU maybe at a bigger disadvantage. If not than we would have found a bunch of studs already wanting to come here.