I wonder if it’s because one polished politician has a D before her name while the other one has an R before his.
Great version of Dancing Queen
- Thread starter NYShoreGuy
- Start date
You make it sound like 400 mass shootings were done by AR15s. Most are done by hand guns.
thats just school shootings. still waiting on that one time your scenario comes true.
lets just switch to normal mass shootings, like the deadliest one in the US ever. 60 people from long range.
forget that tho, as long as you can still pretend that your fantasy could be lived out one day!! duhh.!!
You’re not stopping one school shooting with getting rid of assault rifles because that same person who wants to do it will show up with a hand gun at a school. If you think deranged people will say they took away assault rifles, can’t do it…you’re pretty naive.
Sure, but I think you'd agree that a fully automatic weapon would be more effective there, right?
So we've already acknowledged that there are limits on what we can use for self defense for likely and unlikely scenarios.
There are valid opinions and disagreements on where that line should be between legal and illegal. Hunters and ranchers could have other options that weren't designed to kill people quickly as the AR-15 was.
As I've said though, I think it's too late to do anything about it now.
fwiw, when I think of a "polished politician" I'm thinking of someone who can be charismatic and articulate on political policy and keeps that charisma when they want to misdirect from answering a question or lying about something.
Newsome is a very polished politician for example. I wouldn't trust him at all, but he is effective in his communication skills.
Harris is just incredibly ineffective talking about anything outside of a prepared speech.
so you think an assault rifle does the same amount of damage and body count than a handgun? what about a hangin to knife?
go ahead and answer because whateevr you say will be wrong as proven by pretty much every other country.
and of course your solution is to just do nothing. thats what you're saying. why have laws at all based on your logic?
and please think of the poor hobbyists! despicable take you all have.
You’ve got about 15 posts of 400 mass shootings. Isn’t that the number you want to get down? Assault rifle ban won’t stop that or even lower it. That’s why you’re deflecting and switching topics. The bigger concern should be getting that number down to low double digits or single digits. Waiting to hear how banning assault rifles will do that. You're looking to address how they're doing as opposed to why they're doing it. They'll always find another how to do it if you don't stop why they do it. If you stop why they do it, we can get somewhere.
Last edited:
Similar threads
