I think it is a rare person that a former public defender has the right make up to be a prosecutor. She seems entirely off the wall. Her big campaign issue is that her office will not prosecute misdemeanor crimes except for a few exceptions. She is not what you want as a prosecutor. You want a fair minded person who believes in justice.That people think like this. Even worse, this person is running for Manhattan district attorney.
People like this need to be defeated at the ballot box each and every time they show up. A poisonous, dangerous ideology.
Just read an op Ed from a prosecutor who says that prosecutors should equally split its resources between prosecuting and helping criminals. It’s a real movement.I think it is a rare person that a former public defender has the right make up to be a prosecutor. She seems entirely off the wall. Her big campaign issue is that her office will not prosecute misdemeanor crimes except for a few exceptions. She is not what you want as a prosecutor. You want a fair minded person who believes in justice.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...s-embody-tampas-love-pirates-is-that-problem/
Too many people have too much time on their hands...our beloved Pirate mascot isn't long for the woke society....
California turning purple as a resultLeft wants to make entire US like California.Maybe end of the world is closer than Nostradamus predicted.LOL
California turning purple as a result
That people think like this. Even worse, this person is running for Manhattan district attorney.
People like this need to be defeated at the ballot box each and every time they show up. A poisonous, dangerous ideology.
Id like to read that Op Ed. I disagree 100%. Prosecutors are there to do justice. That may mean allowing someone into a diversionary program like PreTrial Intervention, or Drug Court etc. or it may going to trial to put the guy away for life. But to suggest half the budget that is ludicrous. Prosecutors are not social workers.Just read an op Ed from a prosecutor who says that prosecutors should equally split its resources between prosecuting and helping criminals. It’s a real movement.
It was on NJ.com maybe (must’ve gone there in a very bored moment)Id like to read that Op Ed. I disagree 100%. Prosecutors are there to do justice. That may mean allowing someone into a diversionary program like PreTrial Intervention, or Drug Court etc. or it may going to trial to put the guy away for life. But to suggest half the budget that is ludicrous. Prosecutors are not social workers.
Maybe it’s an indictment on the concept that this is the best they can get? Maybe, maybe not. His activism if practiced is arguably a breach of the oath of office; we have a legislature to make laws, not prosecutorsFound the Op Ed. https://www.nj.com/opinion/2021/02/too-many-prosecutors-are-only-doing-half-the-job-opinion.html
I looked this guy up and it is exactly what I suspected. A nobody who spent very little time as a prosecutor pontificating about what is best. Here is a guy who graduated in 2017 from Fordham Law. He has already left the US Attorneys office in Delaware. Before the US Attorneys Office, he was a member of a private law firm. So we have someone who was maybe has at most two years as a US Attorney acting like he knows what is best for prosecutors? It makes me laugh that this generation can have such big opinions without having an iota of experience and knowledge.
So in three years,this guy has had three different legal jo s and the Star Ledger thinks it is a good idea to print his garbage.
Just read an op Ed from a prosecutor who says that prosecutors should equally split its resources between prosecuting and helping criminals. It’s a real movement.