ADVERTISEMENT

Judge's ruling favors NCAA athletes seeking 2nd transfer

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
186,810
100,965
113

CHARLESTON, West Virginia -- College athletes who were denied the chance to play immediately after transferring a second time can return to competition, for now, after a federal judge issued a 14-day temporary restraining order Wednesday against the NCAA.

U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey in northern West Virginia issued the order against the NCAA from enforcing the transfer rule. A lawsuit filed by West Virginia and six other states alleged the rule's waiver process violated federal antitrust law.

A hearing on the restraining order is scheduled for Dec. 27, Bailey said.

The NCAA didn't immediately indicate whether it would appeal the ruling.

NCAA rules allow underclassmen to transfer once without having to sit out a year. But an additional transfer as an undergraduate generally requires the NCAA to grant a waiver allowing the athlete to compete immediately. Without it, the athlete would have to sit out for a year at the new school.

Last January, the NCAA implemented stricter guidelines for granting those waivers on a case-by-case basis.

The states involved in seeking the restraining order were Colorado, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee and West Virginia.

It wasn't immediately clear whether any of the affected players would try to compete during the 14-day window and what ramifications they could face if the NCAA would prevail in the lawsuit.

West Virginia basketball player RaeQuan Battle transferred this season from Montana State after previously playing at Washington and has been sitting out.

"I'm in the gym every single day with the team, with the blood, sweat and tears with them," Battle said. "When the ball is thrown up and that tipoff starts, I'm not suited up. That's what hurts me the most."

Battle, who grew up on the Tulalip Indian Reservation in the state of Washington, has said his mental health is a big reason he came to West Virginia. Battle said he has lost "countless people" to drugs, alcohol and COVID-19.

After Battle visited West Virginia, he learned that now-coach Josh Eilert had lived on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota with his mother following his parents' divorce and felt a connection.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said in a statement the ruling "paves the way for student athletes, like RaeQuan Battle, to play in the sport they love and continue improving themselves."


"We are looking forward to proving definitively that the NCAA has violated the Sherman Act by failing to maintain a consistent and defensible transfer rule and by denying these student athletes the chance to play," Morrisey said.

The lawsuit alleged requiring athletes to sit can mean lost potential earnings from endorsement deals with their name, image and likeness or professional careers. It pointed to exposure from competing in national broadcasts, noting: "One game can take a college athlete from a local fan favorite to a household name."

"It is ironic that this rule, stylized as promoting the welfare of college athletes, strips them of the agency and opportunity to optimize their own welfare as they see fit," the lawsuit said.

Bailey's ruling came after hearing testimony from athletes whose waiver requests to play immediately were denied.
 
Not a surprising ruling.Judges always in favor of individual freedoms as opposed to the bigger picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMB Pirate
It still comes back to the member schools. They set the rules and aren't willing to abide by them. If they stuck together, they could figure out a solution. But they won't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUisNJsTeam
The NCAA came out with further clarification today. If you play the next two weeks and the ruling is reversed, then you lose a year. Interesting that some of these kids played last night. The kid at UNLV for instance.

What mess. Coaches are pissed. Coaches who didn’t go after kids who needed a second waiver to play (two time transfers) and played by the rules get screwed. The coaches who stretched the rules get rewarded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section112

NCAA: Transfers who compete during TRO will lose eligibility if decision reversed​


  • Jeff Borzello, ESPN Staff Writer

The NCAA added another layer of chaos to the fallout of Wednesday's federal ruling on transfer rules, saying Thursday that student-athletes who participate in games during the 14-day temporary restraining order will lose a season of eligibility if the ruling is reversed.

The NCAA published an eight-question document designed to help its membership in understanding issues stemming from Wednesday's decision. The fourth question asked whether the season of competition legislation applies to a student-athlete competing during the 14-day TRO.

"Yes," the document states. "The 14-day TRO only enjoined Bylaw 14.5.5.1 and does not change the season of competition legislation."

The new guidance walks back a report on Wednesday that cited an NCAA spokesperson saying athletes will not lose a year of eligibility if the ruling is overturned.

A hearing on the restraining order is scheduled for Dec. 27.

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Preston Bailey in West Virginia issued a temporary restraining order against the NCAA, allowing two-time transfers to play immediately. The NCAA allows underclassmen to transfer once without sitting out a year, but a second transfer as an underclassmen requires a waiver to play immediately. The NCAA has granted waivers to certain student-athletes on a case-by-case basis.

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by West Virginia and six other states alleging the NCAA's waiver process violated federal antitrust law.

Following Bailey's order, the NCAA released a statement:

"As a result of today's decision impacting Division I student-athletes, the Association will not enforce the year in residency requirement for multi-time transfers and will begin notifying member schools," the statement read.

Those who had their waivers denied or were awaiting decisions were therefore able to suit up on Wednesday night.

UNLV's Keylan Boone, who started his career at Oklahoma State before transferring to Pacific for a year and then to UNLV, made an immediate impact in his debut for the Runnin' Rebels. Boone came off the bench to score 10 points and grab six rebounds in a 79-64 upset win over No. 8 Creighton.

However, the majority of programs kept their newly-eligible players on the bench out of precaution. LSU star guard Jalen Cook, who transferred from Tulane after starting his career in Baton Rouge, was held out of the Tigers' game against Alabama State. UTSA and McNeese held out multiple players who could have been back on the court, while Little Rock's Makhel Mitchell and Southern Miss' Andre Curbelo also didn't suit up.
 
So they can "work now" so they can earn NIL based on this ruling. Does the next shoe drop and does the IRS start taxing them on their true compensation which should include the fair value of their free tuition?
 
So they can "work now" so they can earn NIL based on this ruling. Does the next shoe drop and does the IRS start taxing them on their true compensation which should include the fair value of their free tuition?
Schools may as well charge tuition, room and board, etc. Most of them can afford it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: garyshu71

NCAA, states aim to extend TRO letting transfers play immediately​


Jeff Borzello, ESPN Staff Writer

After two days of eligibility uncertainty for transfers, a bipartisan state-based coalition and the NCAA filed on Friday a joint motion requesting an extension of Wednesday's temporary restraining order against the NCAA's transfer policy.

The motion would convert the temporary restraining order to a preliminary injunction, allowing student-athletes to play immediately without the possibility of the rule being overturned at a Dec. 27 hearing.

"We don't want the college athletes to get caught in the middle of this court case," Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost said. "The joint motion filed today signifies our shared commitment to ensuring that sports seasons operate smoothly during the legal proceedings."

The NCAA said in a statement issued Friday that, "given the unprecedented decision by the courts earlier this week, the NCAA has reached an agreement with the States to convert the temporary restraining order into a preliminary injunction through the remainder of the 2023-24 NCAA championship season."

The NCAA added that the proposal "is the best outcome for multiple-time transfer student-athletes wishing to compete immediately. This action provides clarity for student-athletes and member schools for the remainder of the academic year -- any multiple-time transfer student-athlete who competes this season will be subject to the same eligibility and use of a season of competition rules as all other student-athletes."

Friday's motion comes one day after the NCAA announced that student-athletes who participate in games during the 14-day temporary restraining order will lose a season of eligibility if the ruling is reversed.

On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Preston Bailey in West Virginia issued a temporary restraining order against the NCAA, allowing two-time transfers to play immediately. The NCAA allows undergraduates to transfer once without sitting out a year, but a second transfer as an undergraduate requires a waiver to play immediately. The NCAA has granted waivers to certain athletes on a case-by-case basis.

The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by West Virginia and six other states alleging that the NCAA's waiver process violated federal antitrust law.

Following Bailey's order, the NCAA released a statement: "As a result of today's decision impacting Division I student-athletes, the Association will not enforce the year in residency requirement for multi-time transfers and will begin notifying member schools."

Since the TRO was issued, the majority of men's basketball players who had their waivers denied or were awaiting decisions continued to be held out of competition out of precaution. UNLV's Keylan Boone suited up on Wednesday night, but LSU's Jalen Cook, Little Rock's Makhel Mitchell and several other players sat out.

On Thursday and Friday, however, multiple schools announced that their previously-ineligible transfers would be dressed and available for this weekend's games. Among that group was West Virginia's RaeQuan Battle, whose waiver denial was at the heart of the coalition's case, and Noah Farrakhan, as well as VCU's Joe Bamisile.
 
Politicians and partisian in state judges getting involved in college athletics.Driving college sports off a cliff.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT