BINGO!The only person who should feel embarassed by this thread is the one who started it.
Look college athletic coaching salaries are outrageous as it is...while no one wants to give salary back or take a pay cut so many state schools have done so. 150 people furloughed is something. If the president of the school is doing a cut those that are in higher positions in athletic department should do so as well and it should be announced.
Setoniansource and shu09 are about as anti NYshoreguy as it comes on here for their reasons but I back their POV.
Not sure HOW BAD of a problem 150 people is....most can’t do anything at home and working at home is what has to be done for now. I’m not trivializing the impact and seriousness- I’m just saying that the figure alone doesn’t warrant major concern (the situation generally and lost revenue warrant some concern of course)Imagine saying/typing this with a straight face. And then imagine believing it. Some people, man.
Another thing: This. Is. Not. About. Donations. A pay cut is not a donation to the school.
Oh, one more thing: While the furlough isn't a terrible outcome for the employee right now, there is no guarantee they will be hired back. If a university is furloughing 150 employees, that's a sign of a problem.
It’s market and I don’t think the market or capitalism are outrageous.Look college athletic coaching salaries are outrageous as it is...while no one wants to give salary back or take a pay cut so many state schools have done so. 150 people furloughed is something. If the president of the school is doing a cut those that are in higher positions in athletic department should do so as well and it should be announced.
Setoniansource and shu09 are about as anti NYshoreguy as it comes on here for their reasons but I back their POV.
A few things: This thread is not a referendum on whether or not Kevin Willard earns his salary or has a right to do what he wants with his money. Let's stipulate that he does earn it and can do what he wants with it.
But if anyone missed the fact earlier in this thread that in university life, the highest-paid people are compensated in such a way and with the understanding that they will, even in a normal year, be returning a generous amount to the institution through philanthropy. It's expected and, in many cases, written in the their contracts. This assures the university and its community that these key, visible people will be seen as leadership donors, which invites the average alum/fan/donor to line up behind that leadership and support these campaigns. You see this in one-time gifts to fund a project, matching gifts, etc.
This is a good system, but there is no getting around the fact that is is expected. And, to repeat, oftentimes, it is bound by contract.
Having said that, I can certainly appreciate the desire many have to do their philanthropy quietly or in anonymity. I have always appreciated that lesson from Jesus about when you gives alms, give quietly with one hand so that the other does not know (and that is a poor paraphrasing of a beautiful idea). My guess is that Kevin Willard is that sort of personality, and that elevates him in my estimation.
However, in a system that even in normal times demands the generous philanthropy of an entire university community to fund its operations and pay its highest salaries - especially on the athletic end at a school where if we're lucky, men's basketball funds itself - it is a practical imperative in a time of such crisis for every one of the highest earners to accept salary reductions and then willingly allow the university to reassure its community that everyone is making sacrifices. How on earth can they furlough employees making $40,000 if those who enjoy absolute financial security aren't dialing back a little bit from their $3.5 million? And again, let's stipulate that in his marketplace, he earns and deserves that salary. But if your university community finds itself in jeopardy, what good is it if you aren't doing your part to help it?
"To whom much is given, much is required."
Et tu Brutus?Great take, SHUHitman.
Another issue on Willard and publicly announcing anything: He makes $2.8 million a year. If he forgoes 20% of that am I still suppose to feel good about that? Is that really a sacrifice?
Great take, SHUHitman.
Another issue on Willard and publicly announcing anything: He makes $2.8 million a year. If he forgoes 20% of that am I still suppose to feel good about that? Is that really a sacrifice?
LMAOIn the history of this board this is the single most classless posting subject I have ever seen. Having come all the way up from punching people in the nuts this has actually taken us right back down there.
Et tu Brutus?
I say no you don’t have to feel good but yes it’s a sacrifice.
It might be 20% of 1.5M btw, cuz he’s already gotten paid half a year. I’m assuming his annual salary is by fiscal year, but that might not be the case. Either way if he took 20% cut for 7 months that’s roughly 300k.
You’re not followingHis current salary is WAY more than $1.5m.
LMAO
Great take, SHUHitman.
Another issue on Willard and publicly announcing anything: He makes $2.8 million a year. If he forgoes 20% of that am I still suppose to feel good about that? Is that really a sacrifice?
No, not at all, it's more a comment on the absurd salaries of college basketball coaches and how them forgoing a percentage of their salaries still makes their sacrifices a joke comparatively. I'm arguing it would be better off not announcing anything so as not to bring to light the absurdness of it all.
I'm very confident Willard would/has stepped up, he always does.
You’re not following
5 months of pay have elapsed/been paid
It’s not a retroactive cut of 20%
So 7 months of 2.8 is 1.5 ish
If I am not doing a good enough job articulating my point, that is my fault, but I'm beginning to feel like I might need to write in crayon to make it any more accessible.Think about your last paragraph for a second. "How on earth can they furlough employees making $40,000...". Maybe because someone in the office actually crunched some numbers and realized these people would likely make the same or MORE than they currently make because of the presently existing unemployment benefits packages. Maybe they realized this makes the most sense for the UNIVERSITY so that they can best allocate their own resources to get through this.
The government is literally handing money out right now, and the unemployment compensation is fantastic for folks not making a significant salary. If I have a bunch of librarians, cooks, cleaners or entry level workers that are sitting around doing nothing because there are no students, and the government is stepping in and willing to keep them afloat for now, wouldn't it be prudent for a small University such as ours to take advantage of it?
You're over here bringing up Jesus Christ and acting like the school threw these people into the poorhouse. They have full benefits and likely near full, full, or beyond full compensation right now. The school may be a non profit university, but it still has to be run like a business or it won't survive. I actually know people that have been furloughed there, do you? I see the situation they have right now, and trust me they are ok. It's incredible the level of grandstanding or virtue signaling we have going on anymore as a society - shit happens, and when it does plenty of people rise up and help others along.
I don't need to know what Kevin Willard is doing, have some faith in your fellow man. But the problem is so many people talk of faith in others but have none. They need a press release or a newspaper article to believe anything anymore.
I agree who knows how long it will last. Contract timing is relevant depending on your contract-and (probably) nobody here knows those details. But I agree contract timing is less relevant when you take the approach of who knows when this will end.Who is to say when this ends though? Contract timing seems meaningless.
If you want to call it a good PR move that’s fine. But there’s no requirement that any person come out and say they voluntarily took a pay cut or donated back to the university. That may lead to questions but no one is entitled to that information. You have the freedom to ask. The person in question has the freedom to tell you to go screw that’s none of your business.Can’t believe he made it public! Should have just done it behind the scenes it’s no one else’s business. How dare the NFL reach into his pocket!!
WrongI bet he already did. This is a private matter. None of our business.
your last sentence - I disagree, respectfullyIf you want to call it a good PR move that’s fine. But there’s no requirement that any person come out and say they voluntarily took a pay cut or donated back to the university. That may lead to questions but no one is entitled to that information. You have the freedom to ask. The person in question has the freedom to tell you to go screw that’s none of your business.
we’re talking about saving jobs. Actions should be more important than talking. On the caring day thread I asked about using my money for employees. There was no spot for that. Why is the school raising money for anything other than keeping employees whole at this point is beyond me.
Great take, SHUHitman.
Another issue on Willard and publicly announcing anything: He makes $2.8 million a year. If he forgoes 20% of that am I still suppose to feel good about that? Is that really a sacrifice?
Wrong
So when Bryan Felt writes this in his newsletter I received this morning:
As we have said throughout this month, we are faced with a difficult financial situation caused by this pandemic. And as we strive to provide our student-athletes the best support to allow them to reach their academic and athletic potential, we need help.
Should I just assume that our highest paid employee at the school has taken a pay cut? Wouldn’t it be beneficial for fundraising to show the sacrifices the athletic department is making? Maybe that played a role in the low donation numbers?
I can’t understand how so many of you are against this, it’s baffling to me.
Wrong still. His salary is publicly available because the university is in a tax advantaged category. Pull up the university 990 filing. If our senior officers are taking pay cuts and I’m weighing responding to the university’s request for help, I’d like to know what the highest paid is doing.Of course it is private. It is none of our business unless he chooses to share with public.
He’s still working. A lot.Wrong still. His salary is publicly available because the university is in a tax advantaged category. Pull up the university 990 filing. If our senior officers are taking pay cuts and I’m weighing responding to the university’s request for help, I’d like to know what the highest paid is doing.
No one doubts he is busting his tail. Always has and I believe alway will. When the ship is in trouble and the senior officers pitch in I believe it’s fair to wonder what he is doing. I’d bet he doing his part. Contrary to you and others, I believe it’s a fair inquiry to have.He’s still working. A lot.