See, I come at it from the opposite direction. He was my first choice when I hired him, and I was a staunch defender well into his fifth season, even as the opinion of many posters changed with the breeze. I say you support a guy (or don't) until it's clear that he doesn't merit that support anymore.
Last year, I was finally forced to concede I had been wrong. It was plainly evident that he was not as good of a coach as I had believed, so my belief was that he should've been let go last year. Now, just as I never changed my mind with the direction of the wind in the first five seasons, I'm not easily swayed now. I don't think coaches just learn how to coach all of a sudden. And there are just too many variables that make the record alone a clear indicator of a coach's ability. Is our record terrific this year? Obviously, and the team is very good. I'm on record here as saying we can, with the right matchups and a few breaks, contend for the Elite Eight. But when our record sucked in 2012-13, I also still contended - loudly - that this guy was a good coach, and that the record alone did not prove otherwise to me. Then, as now, there are too many other factors and variables that told me there was more to consider than just the wins and losses. But as seasons stack up, and I have more and more data to inform my opinion, I realized I had been wrong about what he brings as a head coach. And I haven't seen what I need to see to change my mind. Perhaps if he's still here in four years, and these kinds of seasons (or something similar) have been sustained even as players cycle through the program, I'll again admit I had it wrong. But right now, the scales are still tilted pretty heavily to one side.
Isaiah Whitehead is, right now, playing better than I've ever seen a Seton Hall player play. He's is what we thought he would be, and he is really put the team on his back. Couple that with the sturdy and stabilizing leadership Derrick Gordon brought to the team - I think he literally saved the season after that first Creighton game, when things looked ready to implode again, and there was no Sterling Gibbs to blame. Without his stabilizing presence (to say nothing of the gritty defense tone he set from day one), I'm not sure this team would have been in the position to allow Whitehead to blossom like he has over the past month. Yeah, kids got a year older and all that, but we've seen kids get older for years and never seen a team grow in this same way - even teams led by this head coach. If I was Kevin Willard, I make a spot for Derrick Gordon on the staff next year. He's shown me that much.
So that's where I am with it. I've been careful not to take potshots at the coach this season, even though I do not support him, or piss on threads congratulating him for this or that. He's here for now, and that's that. Wouldn't have been my call, but no one asked me. But there was a post or two last night calling out the silence of the Willard detractors, and I guess I'm identified as one, so here it is for me. This is what I think. It's not really my way to stomp on a win - and of course I want us to win! - so what was I going to say about him last night? I'm also not trying to swim upstream, and there's no point being one of those jerks who can't let it go, and instead makes every post a vehicle for disparaging the coach. But as I said, I'm rooted in my convictions, and I don't change my mind on a coach back and forth over the course of a season, so it would be silly of me to take a posture of reconsideration when I have not changed my mind. We're having a great season, and I'm thrilled. Give the coach a parade? I already spent all my support for him when it wasn't very fashionable, so there just isn't much left. Sorry.