ADVERTISEMENT

Lia Thomas banned as FINA votes to restrict transgender women from competitions

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
187,077
101,584
113

By Associated Press

BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) — World swimming’s governing body has effectively banned transgender women from competing in women’s events, starting Monday.

FINA members widely adopted a new “gender inclusion policy” on Sunday that only permits swimmers who transitioned before age 12 to compete in women’s events. The organization also proposed an “open competition category.”

“This is not saying that people are encouraged to transition by the age of 12. It’s what the scientists are saying, that if you transition after the start of puberty, you have an advantage, which is unfair,” James Pearce, who is the spokesperson for FINA president Husain Al-Musallam, told The Associated Press.

“They’re not saying everyone should transition by age 11, that’s ridiculous. You can’t transition by that age in most countries and hopefully you wouldn’t be encouraged to. Basically, what they’re saying is that it is not feasible for people who have transitioned to compete without having an advantage.”

Pearce confirmed there are currently no transgender women competing in elite levels of swimming.

However, the ruling would seemingly exclude University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas from elite competition.

lia-thomas-transgender-swimming-044.jpg

Transgender swimmer Lia Thomas won an NCAA women’s championship in March.
AP


The World Professional Association for Transgender Health just lowered its recommended minimum age for starting gender transition hormone treatment to 14 and some surgeries to 15 or 17.

FINA’s new 24-page policy also proposed a new “open competition” category. The organization said it was setting up “a new working group that will spend the next six months looking at the most effective ways to set up this new category.”

Pearce told the AP that the open competition would most likely mean more events, but those details still need to be worked out.

“No one quite knows how this is going to work. And we need to include a lot of different people, including transgender athletes, to work out how it would work,” he said. “So there are no details of how that would work. The open category is something that will start being discussed tomorrow.”

The members voted 71.5% in favor at the organization’s extraordinary general congress after hearing presentations from three specialist groups — an athlete group, a science and medicine group and a legal and human rights group — that had been working together to form the policy following recommendations given by the International Olympic Committee last November.


Lia-Thomas-NCAA.jpg

Lia Thomas poses with her trophy after winning the NCAA women’s 500-meter freestyle title on March 17, 2022.Icon Sportswire via
Getty Images


The IOC urged shifting the focus from individual testosterone levels and calling for evidence to prove when a performance advantage existed.

FINA’s “deeply discriminatory, harmful, unscientific” new policy is “not in line with (the IOC’s) framework on fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations,” Anne Lieberman of Athlete Ally, a nonprofit that advocates for LGBTQ athletes, said in a statement.

“The eligibility criteria for the women’s category as it is laid out in the policy (will) police the bodies of all women, and will not be enforceable without seriously violating the privacy and human rights of any athlete looking to compete in the women’s category,” Lieberman said.

FINA said it recognizes “that some individuals and groups may be uncomfortable with the use of medical and scientific terminology related to sex and sex-linked traits (but) some use of sensitive terminology is needed to be precise about the sex characteristics that justify separate competition categories.”

In March, Lia Thomas made history in the United States as the first transgender woman to win an NCAA swimming championship, the 500-yard freestyle.

thomas-gaines-01.jpg

Thomas and Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines react after finishing tied for fifth in the 200 meter freestyle finals on March 18, 2022.Icon Sportswire via
Getty Images


Thomas said last month on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that she was aiming to become an Olympic swimmer. She also disputed those who say she has an unfair biological edge that ruins the integrity of women’s athletics, saying “trans women are not a threat to women’s sports.”

The University of Pennsylvania didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from Thomas.

Other sports have also been examining their rules around transgender athletes.

On Thursday, cycling’s governing body updated its eligibility rules for transgender athletes with stricter limits that will force riders to wait longer before they can compete.

The International Cycling Union (UCI) increased the transition period on low testosterone to two years, and lowered the maximum accepted level of testosterone. The previous transition period was 12 months but the UCI said recent scientific studies show that “the awaited adaptations in muscle mass and muscle strength/power” among athletes who have made a transition from male to female takes at least two years.
 
A win for biological women who are competitive swimmers.

A small step forward for trans athletes as FINA is looking to create a new “open competition” category for trans athletes.

Science was used in formulating a decision, scientists claim that a biological male who transitions after age 12 will always have a competitive advantage over biological females.

Kudos to FINA!
 
Still in shock Title IX advocates remain silent here. I'm surprised they're not outspoken in one direction or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUisNJsTeam

Chris Evert recalls Renee Richards match to explain her trans-athletes stance​

By Ryan Glasspiegel

Chris Evert believes “science and medicine” should factor into whether transgender athletes are permitted to compete in women’s sports.

Evert appeared on an ESPN conference call to promote the network’s exclusive coverage of Wimbledon, where the 18-time major winner is a color commentator.

The Post asked Evert about a recent tweet she sent about competing against Renee Richards, a transgender player, and her general beliefs on transgender athletes in women’s sports.

“I competed against Renee Richards when she was 43 and was not in shape, as she admitted, and [struggled to beat her] — and I was ranked No. 1 in the world,” Evert said on the call.

The two competitors played each other six times between 1978 and 1980, with Evert winning each match.

“The wingspan. The size of the heart. The size of the lungs. The speed. The fast twitch muscles. The testosterone. There’s just everything pointing to the fact that men are quicker, stronger, etc. than women — especially after puberty,” Evert said.



GettyImages-657821521.jpg

Chris Evert recalled playing Renee Richards, a transgender athlete, in the 1979 US Open.
Popperfoto via Getty Images

“For Renee Richards, who I really admire, to come out and say, ‘Now, I think it would be wrong for me to compete’ … she said, ‘Because if I was 25, I would wipe everyone off the court.’ Those are quotes that she said. This isn’t me saying them.”

In 2019, Richards told Sports Illustrated that she would have won Wimbledon had she competed in her 20s.

“It’s just about the physicalities of the body. It has nothing to do with anything else than the physicalities of the body. I support transgender people very, very much,” Evert said. “But, at some point you have to look at science and medicine, and look at that statistic, rather than ‘Wouldn’t it be nice to include transgenders into women’s sports?'”

GettyImages-658356129.jpg

Renee Richards at the 1979 US Open.
Popperfoto via Getty Images

Trans athletes in women’s sports has been a hot button issue for years, but especially since this past November when Lia Thomas, who competed as a male swimmer at Penn before transitioning to female and proceeding to set NCAA records.

This past week, FINA, the governing body for international swimming, barred transgender swimmers from competing against women unless they transitioned before they were 12 years old and puberty began.

Responding to this news earlier this week, US Women’s soccer star Megan Rapinoe called it “cruel” and “disgusting” to prohibit trans women from playing women’s sports.

“Show me the evidence that trans women are taking everyone’s scholarships, are dominating in every sport, are winning every title,” Rapinoe said in an interview with TIME. “I’m sorry, it’s just not happening. So we need to start from inclusion, period. And as things arise, I have confidence that we can figure it out. But we can’t start at the opposite. That is cruel. And frankly, it’s disgusting.

“So, we need to really kind of take a step back and get a grip on what we’re really talking about here because people’s lives are at risk. Kids’ lives are at risk with the rates of suicide, the rates of depression and negative mental health and drug abuse. We’re putting everything through ‘God forbid a trans person can be successful in sports.’ Get a grip on reality and take a step back.”

Martina Navratilova, herself an 18-time singles major champion, took the opposite stance.

“I totally disagree with Megan on this,” Navratilova tweeted. “Fairness must come above inclusion- especially after puberty- around 10-11 years old… before that let kids be kids and just have fun a sling as it’s safe. After puberty biology must come first.”
 
If you were born with a penis you play with others who were also born with a penis. If you were born with a vagina you play with others who were also born with a vagina. Period! Why is this so hard for some people to understand?
 
If you were born with a penis you play with others who were also born with a penis. If you were born with a vagina you play with others who were also born with a vagina. Period! Why is this so hard for some people to understand?
What if you're both with both? Neither? Ambiguous?
 
Can't screw millions to give a few an opportunity.

I knew a doctor who went to med school with Renee Richards. My friend was a REAL conservative guy...told me renee showed up at parties dressed like a woman, this was back in the 50s...there were actually laws against cross dressing in NYC back then.

Like most of us, I don't understand the sexual identity issue that these people have. I hope they are accepted in society and live a good life. I remember in the 60s, a group of gay guys went to the beach in my hometown. We harassed them frequently - quite an embarrassing memory for me. I hope people have gotten away from that stupid prejudice.

But this swimmer issue is so clearly unfair to women.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT