How is the BOR chosen/appointed? Seems very much a good ol’ boys network giving power without true accountability to a very small handful of people. Is this the perception others have as well?
But all under the power of the archdiocese.How is the BOR chosen/appointed? Seems very much a good ol’ boys network giving power without true accountability to a very small handful of people. Is this the perception others have as well?
Seems that’s where we really need to change things up though I have no idea how to make that happen.But all under the power of the archdiocese.
Being McCarrick's secretary is something different than what it sounds like. A bishop's secretary is more like a flunkie or gopher. He brings the bishops vestments, miter, staff to public Masses and may drive him around. But the bishop's srcretary has nothing to do with policy decisions, scheduling appointments, or anything like that. It's usually a very young priest too.I had a long talk with a priest who is close to retirement. He said so many people knew about Uncle Teddy as they called him. He would invite Seminarians to his beach house and pick one to share his BR. The priest said many priests feel very guilty that they didn’t speak up and bring this to the light. If you are his secretary and ran the seminary at the time, I’m not sure how you didn’t know. Tough situation all around but his closeness to the McCarrick situation alone should have taken him off the list of candidates IMO. Really bad decision by the BORs who had to get this decision right after botching/ and maybe creating the Nyre situation. This sucks.
I have no time for Tobin and despised McCarrick since the 1980s. But the Archdiocese is not the evil empire. I think they pick regents who genuinely care about the university. One flaw in choosing is that they tend to favor big benefactors. In reality, being a rich benefactor isn't necessarily a good qualification.But all under the power of the archdiocese.
How is it as hit piece? Because of the timing? Or do the documents not exist? (Hint: they do.)It does seem a little suspect to do a hit piece on Msgr. Reilly and the university on what was probably the last day the university was open before Christmas break.
Yes, timing. No one is really around to respond. Not questioning the validity as usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. Hope I’m wrong on that though.How is it as hit piece? Because of the timing? Or do the documents not exist? (Hint: they do.)
The old Friday afternoon news dump. Seton Hall perfected that.Yes, timing. No one is really around to respond. Not questioning the validity as usually where there’s smoke there’s fire. Hope I’m wrong on that though.
The points about what McCarrick did are right on. Whether our new Pres spent a lot of time with him and did not handle things at the Seminary correctly I do not know for sure and never said I did. It still sounds like a big problem unfortunately. If he was with McCarrick and later ran the Seminary and brushed something under the rug, it is not a good look. The BORs should have vetted that and steered clear. I'm blaming the BORs not our new President. There are lots of good priests who have been accused that are innocent. Lots that are guilty too. Unfortunately the church continues to screw this up and opens itself up to this scrutiny. BORs should have avoided the scrutiny if there was any question when they chose a new President. Can't mess up two Presidents in a row but it seems that may be the case. Hoping it gets settled soon and we move on to the business of running Seton Hall. I wish we weren't talking about this as our University doesn't need continued bad press.Being McCarrick's secretary is something different than what it sounds like. A bishop's secretary is more like a flunkie or gopher. He brings the bishops vestments, miter, staff to public Masses and may drive him around. But the bishop's srcretary has nothing to do with policy decisions, scheduling appointments, or anything like that. It's usually a very young priest too.
Did he run the seminary during McCarrick's tenure? I dont think so.
You're points are based on bad information.