Mount Rushmore of BAD Losses In Entire Program History
- Thread starter Hall-O-Daze
- Start date
Yes. Not even a debate
You’d be surprised at some of them over the years.
Like Kings College.
The problem with this team is that are sorely lacking in talent. What’s really the difference between the SHU, Monmouth, Fordham or Hofstra guys? These results aren’t flukes.
I’ll stand by what I said
This is the WORST team I’ve seen in over a decade
This is the WORST team I’ve seen in over a decade
Glad I’m in Florida today. What a horrendous loss to an 0-8 team… literally lost by 10 to Presbyterian in their last game. Can’t even beat the worst team in the MAAC…
I bet they'll do well in conference. With a player like Bashir, hard to imagine they won't get wins
There’s no difference. Each of those teams actually was more talented. Besides Coleman and Jenkins it truly looks like these guys never played basketball before.
Has to be one of the worst losses in 40 years. Not the most disappointing, heartbreaking or anything like that.
No, I agree. It’s not the most disappointing or heartbreaking(I can barely muster a shrug, at this point). If that were the case, Western Kentucky would have to be way up there. But, in comparison to this, that 1993 game doesn’t seem like a bad loss.
From Carino:
Seton Hall (4-4) came in 15-0 all-time against the Hawks, a series that dated back to 1983. The Pirates have now lost three games to mid-majors and two of them were “buy” games at home – a first for the program since 2013-14. It's the first time in the two decades of Kenpom.com's existence that they've lost to a team ranked over 300.
Monmouth (1-8) came into the game ranked 315th defensively, yet the Pirates shot just 35 percent from the field, including 5-of-21 from 3-point range. The Hall also hit just 8-of-16 free-throw attempts, which is roughly consistent with their season average.
Seton Hall (4-4) came in 15-0 all-time against the Hawks, a series that dated back to 1983. The Pirates have now lost three games to mid-majors and two of them were “buy” games at home – a first for the program since 2013-14. It's the first time in the two decades of Kenpom.com's existence that they've lost to a team ranked over 300.
Monmouth (1-8) came into the game ranked 315th defensively, yet the Pirates shot just 35 percent from the field, including 5-of-21 from 3-point range. The Hall also hit just 8-of-16 free-throw attempts, which is roughly consistent with their season average.
“….ranked 315th defensively, yet the Pirates shot just 35 percent from the field….”
Kinda puts it all in perspective.
Sad -- but try as I can - there are no excuses . If not the worse loss, it certainly looked to me as the worse loss.
I mean they had us down 15 after 35 minutes of play. 15!!! Monmouth!
It's a catastrophe. We're piling up Q4 losses, our metrics are so terrible and literally the worst amongst in the country in so many areas offensively (2PT, FT, turnovers), that digging out of it is already not going to happen because our players aren't good enough and it's already about 25% of our games.
It's a catastrophe. We're piling up Q4 losses, our metrics are so terrible and literally the worst amongst in the country in so many areas offensively (2PT, FT, turnovers), that digging out of it is already not going to happen because our players aren't good enough and it's already about 25% of our games.
At least that means that we’re down to 75 percent left to watch. Because it’s not going to get any better.
And hopefully no complaints about KenPom undervaluing Seton Hall this year!
I can’t remember seeing a worse team honestly.
Sha’s first year, we were petty bad but there was hope for the future with how good he was.
This is the worst I have seen and I don’t see a reason for hope.
Sha’s first year, we were petty bad but there was hope for the future with how good he was.
This is the worst I have seen and I don’t see a reason for hope.
And even that year the team was 8-5 in BE at one point with hope.
I hope we don’t miss the days where 10-10 in the BE was our bottom but I think we’re there.
