Down one from 65. Not as bad as I feared.
Georgetown 191 from 194.
Georgetown 191 from 194.
Need to get to 19 wins going into Big East Tourney and win 1 at the Garden. That is 20 wins and we should be in .I think the next 3 games are really going to give us some clarity on our chances of dancing.....
0 wins - Serious Trouble. We would have to win 3 remaining home games and win at Creighton
1 win - Need to win remaining home games to get to 12 wins (or win at Creighton)
2 wins - Very good shape. 5 quad 1 wins
3 wins - Excluding a complete collapse, I would say we are a lock, as that would have us at 11 wins with 6 quad 1s
I would love to get 2 wins in this stretch.
KenpomSeeing brackets w butler, prov and st johns and not us is frustrating
39 | St. John's | 14-9 | +16.48 |
49 | Butler | 15-8 | +14.96 |
54 | Providence | 15-8 | +13.90 |
62 | Seton Hall | 15-8 | +12.63 |
40 | Villanova | 12-11 | +16.33 |
Stop lookingSeeing brackets w butler, prov and st johns and not us is frustrating
Not sure what brackets you're looking at, possibly from a few days ago. Everything I've seen as of this morning has us in firmly as a 10 or 11 seed. Bracketmatrix has us as the first 12 seed, but they haven't updated since yesterday, so we will probably move up after last night's win.Seeing brackets w butler, prov and st johns and not us is frustrating
3 of 7 isn't going to get it doneNone of this matters
**assuming** @Creighton and @UConn won’t go well
We have 5 games:
2 Nova
Butler
Xavier
St John’s
That’s the season..win 3 and we are in..2 it’s close..1 not going to make it
That’s the season in a nutshell
Did we forget about, "who did you beat"? Look at florida who just got their first NET top 50 winKenpom
39 St. John's 14-9 +16.48
49 Butler 15-8 +14.96
54 Providence 15-8 +13.90
62 Seton Hall 15-8 +12.63
And what the hell
40 Villanova 12-11 +16.33
Why 3 of 7?3 of 7 isn't going to get it done
If you respect Brad Watchel as a bracketologist and he is one of the best IMO, he states Seton Hall finishing 12-8 in BE play with all their wins down the stretch being home Q2 wins at best would put them in a first 4 IN / OUT scenario.Definitely wasn’t my point..but thanks for the input
And it would be 4 of 8 btw which gets us in 1000%
#1 why are your posts always so long..it’s obnoxiousIf you respect Brad Watchel as a bracketologist and he is one of the best IMO, he states Seton Hall finishing 12-8 in BE play with all their wins down the stretch being home Q2 wins at best would put them in a first 4 IN / OUT scenario.
They would be 4-8 in Quad 1 at that point which is ok. And you still haven’t factored in potential bid stealers.
12-8 and you have to worry about BET tourney and other things across the country, while sweating it out on selection Sunday.
13-7 and you can say SHU should be comfortably in.
#1. Be better. I don’t treat this like a chat group. So my answers will always be more comprehensive to state or defend my point. If you don’t like it or reading is too difficult of a task for you, then just block me or ignore my posts, but don’t come at me like a whinny teenager.#1 why are your posts always so long..it’s obnoxious
#2 how could he say that in a vacuum without presenting the variables of how other bubble teams finish?
I agree that they mostly likely don’t and are relying on the NET to help generalize where teams go.Do the people that do the brackets actually even look at the head to head ,actual conference record, the team's that have the biggest win or top overall wins. They obviously don't and are clueless and stupid.
Bolded seems crazy to me. Why even have conference play if you're not gonna use the results?I agree that they mostly likely don’t and are relying on the NET to help generalize where teams go.
However, the committee doesn’t factor head to head or conference record when decided if one team gets in over the other. This they have come out and stated previously.
In 2021-22 SMU finished 2nd in the AAC and Memphis 3rd. They beat Memphis twice in the regular season (lost to them in the AAC semis which isn’t supposed to count as much). Memphis gets into the tournament and SMU did not.
Not really. Big East will probably finish as the 2nd or 3rd best conference in the country this year. Year in and year out, Big East shows why it's a Power conference in basketball. And right now Seton Hall is third in that conference.At the current rate, there are going to be a lot of disappointed Hall fans on Selection Sunday because they are clearly trending in the wrong direction, because other teams are simply doing better. And that’s before bid stealing season commences
They don't.Do the people that do the brackets actually even look at the head to head ,actual conference record, the team's that have the biggest win or top overall wins. They obviously don't and are clueless and stupid.
That’s what I mean when other teams are doing better. Look at results around the country. SHU’s metrics are stagnant at best. Also a 2-3 record over the last few weeks. Other teams are just doing better. Of course that can change, but until then…Not really. Big East will probably finish as the 2nd or 3rd best conference in the country this year. Year in and year out, Big East shows why it's a Power conference in basketball. And right now Seton Hall is third in that conference.
The problem isn't that other teams are doing better (as shown clearly with my St. John's example), the problem is that SHU is not getting credit for our record due to our NET ranking. Because even though we win, we don't win "pretty" enough for the metrics. And unfortunately it's becoming clear that the NET ranking is what a lot of voters lean on to make their determinations.
They don't.
I find it maddening that Seton Hall is on the bubble as of right now.
Who knows what happens the rest of the way but as of right now Seton Hall should be clearly in.
you've been saying a lot that it's a bit too early to claim anything. including this. their losses weren't bad whatsoever. beat nova and theyre trending up againAt the current rate, there are going to be a lot of disappointed Hall fans on Selection Sunday because they are clearly trending in the wrong direction, because other teams are simply doing better. And that’s before bid stealing season commences.
It's not that we don't win pretty, it's that we beat lousy teams. Eight of our 15 wins are quad four wins, two others are quad three. That's two/thirds of our wins against Q3 and Q4. We have five wins against Q1 and Q2. St. John's has seven.Not really. Big East will probably finish as the 2nd or 3rd best conference in the country this year. Year in and year out, Big East shows why it's a Power conference in basketball. And right now Seton Hall is third in that conference.
The problem isn't that other teams are doing better (as shown clearly with my St. John's example), the problem is that SHU is not getting credit for our record due to our NET ranking. Because even though we win, we don't win "pretty" enough for the metrics. And unfortunately it's becoming clear that the NET ranking is what a lot of voters lean on to make their determinations.
Their strength of schedule (No. 7 NET overall) and three Q1 wins, all away from home against top 40 opponents. They are 6-8 against Q1 and Q2 and have only played four Q4 games -- two of which were DePaul.Nova has 2 quad 3 losses as well, less quad 1 wins and is 1 game over .500 overall, 10th in the BE w a sub .500 BE record. How do u justify them w a top 50 net? I mean they are considered a quad 1 game today.