Strategy? - lolSaving all the money for boogie and a post player….. I guess you can spend money on a 4 star high school recruit who didn’t do anything their freshman year or spend money on a decent player who played ok in bad MM leagues.. wonder what the strategy will be next off season
Hope so, but I don't know how I can conclude that based on the school he's coming from, the conference, and where he is ranked by people who follow the portal. It is one thing to believe that a kid rated 105 has the potential to end up like a top 50 portal add. It is another thing when the kid is rated 4-7-8.We need size. We need size that’s not going to drift around the perimeter shooting 3s. We need size that can rebound. This is a good pick up.
Hope so, but I don't know how I can conclude that based on the school he's coming from, the conference, and where he is ranked by people who follow the portal. It is one thing to believe that a kid rated 105 has the potential to end up like a top 50 portal add. It is another thing when the kid is rated 4-7-8.
With all due respect, this is the pool we’re fishing in. This is a good pickup. How will it pan out? Who knows but he has done things we need, albeit at a lower level.Hope so, but I don't know how I can conclude that based on the school he's coming from, the conference, and where he is ranked by people who follow the portal. It is one thing to believe that a kid rated 105 has the potential to end up like a top 50 portal add. It is another thing when the kid is rated 4-7-8.
I don’t know either. Maybe kids at this level are realizing that most of the big money has now been spent by other programs on better players and that they had better look at their options realistically.I also still don't get how we got 2 pickups in 2 days, with the other we have on board, if folks are correct about us not committing the "rev share" pot towards players. How exactly are we entering into agreements with these kids then? What has changed? Or is the price tag that low in this seemingly inflated market that it is still all within collective dollars.
Yes! Welcome to Seton Hall.Welcome aboard!
If he as at least a "C" that would be okay by me. However if he is a "D" or "F" then we are in big trouble.Another C rated transfer for me.
Do you honestly expect answers to those questions? Not in a million years.I also still don't get how we got 2 pickups in 2 days, with the other we have on board, if folks are correct about us not committing the "rev share" pot towards players. How exactly are we entering into agreements with these kids then? What has changed? Or is the price tag that low in this seemingly inflated market that it is still all within collective dollars.
Tubek did nothing here outside of one game, when the program was dying for an athletic shooter. I will take this trade if you want to frame it that way.I don't know what's going on but every pickup I look at and say to myself "oh great that is a nice 10/11/12th guy for the roster"
Tubek goes to UTEP and we replace him with this guy. I guess. Who the hell knows anymore.
Agreed. But him and Jenkins were both highly sought after as transfers when Pitino left because they played awesome under him and you could project how they would make the jump. Clayton was considered a very good get for Florida when he went there and Jenkins was Pitino’s best player year 1. Those guys were pretty sought after transfers.Hard to argue with you but look at Walter Clayton Jr. Went from Iona to the best player in this year's tournament.
if this is the strategy then it's the same as last year and thats a major red flag on Sha.Staring to think Sha is still looking to spread his money fairly evenly and wants to play 10 guys. Was hoping for 1 or 2 alpha types for 7 figures but he either doesn't want to spend his budget like that or we don't have the budget we think we do.