Boise State among 4 joining Pac-12 for 2026-27
Boise State, Colorado State, San Diego State and Fresno State will join the Pac-12 in the 2026-27 academic year, they announced Thursday.
www.espn.com
Yes, but they have another year to make it happen. They will get two. It now depends on who they ask. There are some in the camp that say wait and see if the ACC crashes.Still need 2 more
They only have a year to wait.Yes, but they have another year to make it happen. They will get two. It now depends on who they ask. There are some in the camp that say wait and see if the ACC crashes.
Imho cal and stamford made on the whim decisionsYes, but they have another year to make it happen. They will get two. It now depends on who they ask. There are some in the camp that say wait and see if the ACC crashes.
Don’t really see a fit from the ACC from the PAC’s perspective or from the ACC schools perspective.
New Mexico State seems to fit in a lot of ways. Struggling to come up with a second (assuming no more teams defect from Mountain West).
"I am thankful to our Board..."Boise State among 4 joining Pac-12 for 2026-27
Boise State, Colorado State, San Diego State and Fresno State will join the Pac-12 in the 2026-27 academic year, they announced Thursday.www.espn.com
I don't know....they may want to re-brand as the "State" conference....lol and only admit schools with "State" in their name...and therefore "state funds" in their banks...The best remaining brands are probably UNLV and Air Force. Wyoming from a football perspective makes a lot of sense. Other than that you have to start looking at the American: Tulane, Memphis, UTSA etc.
If they don’t want to pay $$$ in conference exit fees, then FCS powers North Dakota State and Montana’s application fee to join would be $5 million each. But i think that there is a probation period and postseason ban initially for new FBS schools so it may not fit the PAC-12’s timeline. It might help the MWC stop the bleeding however, or help the American if two schools jump to the PAC-12.
Mountain West 2.0That’s still a Group of 5 (or i guess now you can say 6) conference. Ho hum.
Agreed on unlv and air force, but I assume that if they didn’t come over with the first wave of mw teams then they probably aren’t being targeted.The best remaining brands are probably UNLV and Air Force. Wyoming from a football perspective makes a lot of sense. Other than that you have to start looking at the American: Tulane, Memphis, UTSA etc.
If they don’t want to pay $$$ in conference exit fees, then FCS powers North Dakota State and Montana’s application fee to join would be $5 million each. But i think that there is a probation period and postseason ban initially for new FBS schools so it may not fit the PAC-12’s timeline. It might help the MWC stop the bleeding however, or help the American if two schools jump to the PAC-12.
If it is from a football branding perspective, UNLV, Tulane and Memphis have all been good to pretty good recently, but they are also a fertile ground for coaches getting poached, and what you worry about with those schools is sustainability after that happens. Air Force usually solid as well but they are their own unique thing with the military connection IMO.The best remaining brands are probably UNLV and Air Force. Wyoming from a football perspective makes a lot of sense. Other than that you have to start looking at the American: Tulane, Memphis, UTSA etc.
If they don’t want to pay $$$ in conference exit fees, then FCS powers North Dakota State and Montana’s application fee to join would be $5 million each. But i think that there is a probation period and postseason ban initially for new FBS schools so it may not fit the PAC-12’s timeline. It might help the MWC stop the bleeding however, or help the American if two schools jump to the PAC-12.
This PAC 12 is not the old PAC 12. Its new deal in 2026 will be lucky if it’s worth $10 million per team. No ACC team is coming back to the PAC 12 that will never be a power conference again. It is a Group of 5/6 conference at best. UConn is going to travel 2500 mies for all its away games? Really, for $10 million a year?I think it would depend on what they've signed away to the ACC but a good starting point, as Brett mentions would be Stanford and Cal. I'd would also throw in SMU and, if they want to go to 10, UNLV would likely be the next best option.
Or they could sit on nine and throw UConn the football life raft it needs as a partial member. If the Huskies could get a share of a conference's football money and keep it's other sports in the Big East, that might be a win-win for them.
If it is from a football branding perspective, UNLV, Tulane and Memphis have all been good to pretty good recently, but they are also a fertile ground for coaches getting poached, and what you worry about with those schools is sustainability after that happens. Air Force usually solid as well but they are their own unique thing with the military connection IMO.
No doubt. And when that happens those schools look downward often to fill their spot with the next hot HC candidate, like FSU did with Norvell from Memphis or Houston did with Fritz from Tulane.I think all schools except Alabama, Georgia, Ohio State and perhaps Michigan and LSU worry about their coaches getting poached. In the last few years: UCLA, Washington, Oklahoma and, incredibly, Notre Dame lost their coaches. None of the schools that are being discussed in conference realignment are forever jobs.
Basically what we said (and the list I made) except he added the factor the UNLV may not be able to come without Nevada.