If my understanding is current with the latest information, then yes, two different things between conventional NIL + university revenue sharing. Theoretically if we had a viable NIL (we don't) we could add it to the revenue sharing number, yes. A team like Villanova could add their $5M NIL to the revenue sharing number.So with outside money we should have 7 million??? Not sure how this works.
This shows me that SH is still the least funded BE team. We do not have the average 5.7M in rev share even after the University absorbs our Collective.
We’d make a fortune taxing our BE opponents off the difference in NIL!This is as hard to understand as Trump's Tariff proposal!
The day is coming of no rules about anything. Eligibility, academics, etc will be left to the dustbin of historyIf my understanding is current with the latest information, then yes, two different things between conventional NIL + university revenue sharing. Theoretically if we had a viable NIL (we don't) we could add it to the revenue sharing number, yes. A team like Villanova could add their $5M NIL to the revenue sharing number.
But Seton Hall still has a poor NIL.
However, there is a portion of the House settlement bill that features a clearinghouse on NIL valuation that attempts to coral the free spending on NIL with market pricing. That portion will probably get shot down on appeal.
Age 46 Lebron to Ohio St/Akron ?The day is coming of no rules about anything. Eligibility, academics, etc will be left to the dustbin of history