ADVERTISEMENT

NJ GOP really going after the big issues

You act like it's petty and there are tons more important things to tackle, but weren't there more important things to tackle when the dems put this in place. So you were ok with dems wasting their time putting this in place, but you're not ok with republicans taking the time to get rid of it. Ask most people if they want no bags and paper straws, they'll agree with the GOP. Paper straws are horrible and just about everybody ended up in a store without a bag at one point and either had to leave with their arms full carrying things or they just didn't buy everything they wanted to get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu09
You act like it's petty and there are tons more important things to tackle, but weren't there more important things to tackle when the dems put this in place. So you were ok with dems wasting their time putting this in place, but you're not ok with republicans taking the time to get rid of it. Ask most people if they want no bags and paper straws, they'll agree with the GOP. Paper straws are horrible and just about everybody ended up in a store without a bag at one point and either had to leave with their arms full carrying things or they just didn't buy everything they wanted to get.
NJ was a pioneering state on this. Once signed it did not take effect until 18 months after. People should be aware of their state laws. I like using resuable bags and have no priority preference on plastic vs paper straw though it is better for the enviroment to be paper oriented....so you thing NJ GOP gonna flip state house and senate but going on this on this new culture war?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobbie Solo
We should have gone after plastic water bottles but Dems were getting kick backs so we made an example of plastic straws instead. Personally would rather get rid of plastic bottles and bags and keep plastic straws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu09
You act like it's petty and there are tons more important things to tackle, but weren't there more important things to tackle when the dems put this in place. So you were ok with dems wasting their time putting this in place, but you're not ok with republicans taking the time to get rid of it. Ask most people if they want no bags and paper straws, they'll agree with the GOP. Paper straws are horrible and just about everybody ended up in a store without a bag at one point and either had to leave with their arms full carrying things or they just didn't buy everything they wanted to get.

You realize plastic waste is bad though, right? That the plastic waste just ends up leeching into everything?

We should be doing more to reduce the amount of plastic waste, not going backwards.
 
We should have gone after plastic water bottles but Dems were getting kick backs so we made an example of plastic straws instead. Personally would rather get rid of plastic bottles and bags and keep plastic straws.

Bottles are more difficult for a variety of reasons, but that’s why you start with the smaller things. Get people used to the idea that plastic is bad (because it is) so they will be open to doing more.

Unfortunately people just can’t take a small inconvenience. I hate paper straws, so i don’t use them. If I forget a bag, my groceries go from the cart to the car. Really not that big of a deal. Also prefer seeing less plastic bags on the side of the roads as well.
 
You realize plastic waste is bad though, right? That the plastic waste just ends up leeching into everything?

We should be doing more to reduce the amount of plastic waste, not going backwards.
we draw the lines at plastic bags and straws? Nothing like getting a plastic cup at Starbucks for your iced tea and drinking it with a paper straw. Cup ok, straw bad. Or buying 5 Gatorade’s in plastic bottles but I can’t get a plastic bag to carry them out in? What a joke
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu09
Unfortunately people just can’t take a small inconvenience. I hate paper straws, so i don’t use them. If I forget a bag, my groceries go from the cart to the car. Really not that big of a deal. Also prefer seeing less plastic bags on the side of the roads as well.
and what happens when you get a call from the wife to pick up 3 bags of ice and 6 drinks from 7-11, no cart. You take 3-4 trips.
 
Bottles are more difficult for a variety of reasons, but that’s why you start with the smaller things. Get people used to the idea that plastic is bad (because it is) so they will be open to doing more.
we used glass bottles for decades. How hard is it to go back.
 
The horror. How often does this happen to you?
You figure it out. It’s a mild inconvenience.
Basically every time I go shopping. I don’t carry bags with me for the hell of it.

Any reason why all these places like dunkin and Starbucks don’t use paper cups for their cold drinks? They have them in stock since they use them for hot drinks.
 
To switch out the billions of bottles produced per year for glass? Harder than you think. You don’t just change the setting from plastic to glass…
They switched out glass for plastic pretty damn quick when they found out how much cheaper it is. Glass is heavier so more money to transport and glass breaks. Neither of which is something ceo’s want to hear.

Heck we’re not even switching out plastic cups for paper cups. It’s all about picking and choosing where they want to make a political move and for some reason it’s straws and bags.
 
Last edited:
Basically every time I go shopping. I don’t carry bags with me for the hell of it.

Any reason why all these places like dunkin and Starbucks don’t use paper cups for their cold drinks? They have them in stock since they use them for hot drinks.

Yes, because idiots will stomp their feet and whine that their drinking experience is slightly worse than it used to be and they can’t deal with that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUSA
They switched out glass for plastic pretty damn quick when they found out how much cheaper it is. Glass is heavier so more money to transport and glass breaks. Neither of which is something ceo’s want to hear.

Exactly. That’s part of the reason why it’s not easy to switch.

It’s more expensive, and that cost has to go to the consumer and they don’t want consumption to decrease. It’s the right thing to do, but the public has to be on board and willing to pay for it.

Bags were easy to stop because we can adapt quickly. (Well some people can) Glass is not easy to switch to.
 
Exactly. That’s part of the reason why it’s not easy to switch.

It’s more expensive, and that cost has to go to the consumer and they don’t want consumption to decrease. It’s the right thing to do, but the public has to be on board and willing to pay for it.

Bags were easy to stop because we can adapt quickly. (Well some people can) Glass is not easy to switch to.
Love how we make the consumers adapt but when it comes to big business politicians draw the line.

Isn’t it equally good that people drink less soda if it’s more expensive? Sounds like a small change people can deal with. Or is that a horror?
 
Yes, because idiots will stomp their feet and whine that their drinking experience is slightly worse than it used to be and they can’t deal with that.
So the companies are ok to deal with idiots stomping their feet on straws, but not cups. People are drinking from paper cups for their hot drinks and don't complain. Nobody complained when many businesses switched from styrofoam to paper. You know it's not about customer reaction. You know it's about profit and not about saving the planet or drinking experience. They change the straws because it's a cheap way to show hey we're doing something green. And then you get a couple idiots who become loyalists because look how great they are, they changed the straw!!!!!

In the mean time, explain how come when you buy produce you bag it in a plastic bag?
 
I doubt you’re a pro plastic person with everything you have posted here about health and food, so I’m just not sure why you’d be in favor of more plastic bag waste is a good option.

Just so I understand what you’re arguing here, are you arguing that we should have more plastic waste, or are you arguing against incremental changes to reduce that waste? Or is it just politics?
 
I doubt you’re a pro plastic person with everything you have posted here about health and food, so I’m just not sure why you’d be in favor of more plastic bag waste is a good option.

Just so I understand what you’re arguing here, are you arguing that we should have more plastic waste, or are you arguing against incremental changes to reduce that waste? Or is it just politics?
I'm not pro plastic but I'd rather walk out with a plastic bag than let my drink sit in a plastic bottle for months. A straw is used for 5 minutes or less most times. Giving someone a bag who needs it isn't a terrible thing. You want to make a rule of no bags for less than 3 items, I can roll with that. I live right by a convenient store and see people walking out with their hands full because they can't give out a bag? It's just stupid. You know there are people in the world like Jim Abbott. We can't give him a bag? Or the person with 3 kids trying to to buy some things, we can't give them a bag while they got 1 kid by the hand and another kid being held in the other arm. WTF are we doing? I can imagine you with your kids when they were little in Disney, buying souvenirs and holding the kids without a bag. But it's an inconvenience for the consumer you don't mind, but make a real change like bottles.....no no no that's too big. Yet coke seems to do it quite easily for Mexico. When I do have a soda it's Stewarts. Glass bottle and cane sugar instead of HFCS. But literally the straw and bag thing is absurd. It's as insignificant as us watching our carbon emissions while China is 1,000 times worse and doing nothing about it.
 
Last edited:
I live right by a convenient store and see people walking out with their hands full because they can't give out a bag?

Go in with a bag if it's an issue for you. Adapt.

but make a real change like bottles.....no no no that's too big.

Again, the public is not on board with changing. That's the issue. Consumers don't care about plastic waste so we will continue to live like it has zero impact. Companies aren't going to do it if the public is not on board and the government is not going to do everything all at once. That's why you start to introduce small incremental changes that people can adapt to, then move on to the next thing.

People can't deal with the struggle of a plastic straw and remembering a bag though so here we are. Trying to undue something that reduces plastic waste.

It's as insignificant as us watching our carbon emissions while China is 1,000 times worse and doing nothing about it.

1000x worse? Per capita, we are worse than China.
Plus they have been developing / deploying renewables at a rapid rate. and their renewable to total energy production is higher than the US.
 
Go in with a bag if it's an issue for you. Adapt.
You act like people are living their lives walking around with bags constantly. Is your life that planned? That’s not reality for most of the world.
Go in with a bag if it's an issue for you. Adapt.



Again, the public is not on board with changing. That's the issue. Consumers don't care about plastic waste so we will continue to live like it has zero impact. Companies aren't going to do it if the public is not on board and the government is not going to do everything all at once. That's why you start to introduce small incremental changes that people can adapt to, then move on to the next thing.

People can't deal with the struggle of a plastic straw and remembering a bag though so here we are. Trying to undue something that reduces plastic waste.
companies are concerned about profit. The only time they are concerned about public concern is if it will impact profit.
1000x worse? Per capita, we are worse than China.
Plus they have been developing / deploying renewables at a rapid rate. and their renewable to total energy production is higher than the US.
Yes I am sure the earth is worried about per capita more than total volume
 
Is your life that planned? That’s not reality for most of the world.

I keep bags in the trunks of my cars.

companies are concerned about profit. The only time they are concerned about public concern is if it will impact profit.

Yes, exactly. Companies will always choose profit over doing the right thing, which is why we need government regulation. The government balances regulation and burden to those companies and citizens.

Yes I am sure the earth is worried about per capita more than total volume

Ignoring per capita to make an argument is pretty ridiculous. Of course China's emissions would be greater than the US when they have more than 4x the number of people.
 
I keep bags in the trunks of my cars.
Good for you. I choose to take mass transportation most places. I don't carry bags with me.

Yes, exactly. Companies will always choose profit over doing the right thing, which is why we need government regulation. The government balances regulation and burden to those companies and citizens.
Bags and straws, what balance. And nobody remembers when people were bitching we're cutting down too many trees 3 or 4 decades ago. Now more paper straws is ok. Weird.

Ignoring per capita to make an argument is pretty ridiculous. Of course China's emissions would be greater than the US when they have more than 4x the number of people.
It's not ridiculous. We have more people than a lot of countries and because of that we bear more responsibility than those countries. And it works the same way, where countries bigger than us bear more responsibility. I'm not here saying Trinidad and Tobago is polluting the air more than us because their emission rate per capita is double ours. That would be ridiculous.
 
Bags and straws, what balance. And nobody remembers when people were bitching we're cutting down too many trees 3 or 4 decades ago. Now more paper straws is ok. Weird.

Yes, it is a balance. Is plastic waste good or bad? Should we aim to reduce the amount we are throwing away or no?

It's not ridiculous. We have more people than a lot of countries and because of that we bear more responsibility than those countries.

Split China in 4 equal quarters. All of a sudden each of those countries would be larger than us and contributing less than us per capita and in total of each. Did anything change other than China A, B, C and D now exist? To suggest that China is worse than the US in emissions because they are 4x the size of us is really just an absurd point to make, as if they should only be allowed to produce the same amount of energy as us with 4x the population...
 
Yes, it is a balance. Is plastic waste good or bad? Should we aim to reduce the amount we are throwing away or no?
Yes plastic is bad. We should go after the bottles, but we stop at straws and bags?

Split China in 4 equal quarters. All of a sudden each of those countries would be larger than us and contributing less than us per capita and in total of each. Did anything change other than China A, B, C and D now exist? To suggest that China is worse than the US in emissions because they are 4x the size of us is really just an absurd point to make, as if they should only be allowed to produce the same amount of energy as us with 4x the population...
Their rules and regulations cover a much larger area. Their rules and regulation have more impact than ours do. It's really that simple.
 
Yes plastic is bad. We should go after the bottles, but we stop at straws and bags?

Who says we stopped?
I would bet we will go after plastic bottles in my lifetime, but we're clearly not ready because people lose their minds about straws. .

Their rules and regulations cover a much larger area. Their rules and regulation have more impact than ours do. It's really that simple.

They need to produce enough energy to meet the needs of their population.
Because their population is large, you think that each family in China should not be able to use as much energy as the rest of the world?

I'm hoping you know how dumb that is but just want to continue to argue the point.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT