It's actually scary. What stops them from doing it to someone else?
Not a fan of Trump or the lies he is spewing, but I am not a fan of censorship. That is the beginning of a slippery slope and very dangerous to democracy.And that’s a good thing.
Not a fan of Trump or the lies he is spewing, but I am not a fan of censorship. That is the beginning of a slippery slope and very dangerous to democracy.
Also, pretty ironic the Ayatollah has a Twitter account and has called for the extermination of Israelis, but guess that doesn’t get your account terminated.
Or perhaps they put something behind it and ban any account that openly incites violence.Not a fan of Trump or the lies he is spewing, but I am not a fan of censorship. That is the beginning of a slippery slope and very dangerous to democracy.
Also, pretty ironic the Ayatollah has a Twitter account and has called for the extermination of Israelis, but guess that doesn’t get your account terminated.
A lot more than 5 people are dead because of things incited on the Twitter. Isn’t it discrimination that only one person has been banned? I’m pretty sure terrorist groups have accounts and are not banned.Unfortunately, 5 people are dead because Trump and a few other select people lied to these people and told them that the election was stolen, that they could overturn the results and they need to fight.
If they were still alive, Trump would still have his Twitter account.
Twitter as a platform had to decide if there should be a consequence to the rhetoric that lead to these deaths. I don’t know if I would have done it in the same position since that could make things worse in the long run, but I don’t know how you do nothing either.
A lot more than 5 people are dead because of things incited on the Twitter. Isn’t it discrimination that only one person has been banned?
Didn’t you just say if those people were still alive you believe he would still have his Twitter. So the reason he got shut down is 5 people died for a cause he promoted and even helped create. If you look at the number of people who promoted things that resulted in 5 people dying, more than Trump should be permanently deleted. Heck BLM promoted and created protests all over that resulted in 5 deaths, shouldn’t they be banned too.Discrimination? No. Twitter has banned many people for violating rules Trump has violated many times. He could have been banned years ago.
It was a single decision based on a certain set of circumstances.
Didn’t you just say if those people were still alive you believe he would still have his Twitter.
So the reason he got shut down is 5 people died for a cause he promoted and even helped create. If you look at the number of people who promoted things that resulted in 5 people dying, more than Trump should be permanently deleted. Heck BLM promoted and created protests all over that resulted in 5 deaths, shouldn’t they be banned too.
Yes. And thank goodness they also suspended Flynn and Powell’s accounts (not our friend Myles).Or perhaps they put something behind it and ban any account that openly incites violence.
Please provide a list of those suspended and those banned.Discrimination? No. Twitter has banned many people for violating rules Trump has violated many times. He could have been banned years ago.
It was a single decision based on a certain set of circumstances.
twitter bans people all the time. its their platform.It's actually scary. What stops them from doing it to someone else?
terrorist accounts are indeed banned. and removed. the problem is they are hard to find. small groups that pop up undercover of millions of accounts.A lot more than 5 people are dead because of things incited on the Twitter. Isn’t it discrimination that only one person has been banned? I’m pretty sure terrorist groups have accounts and are not banned.
You’re a gentlemen for that link. Summary of the list: terrorists, abusers (specific offenses against individuals like stalking/harassment) and the President. I assume you feel that he fits. I respect your opinion, auditor.
You’re a gentlemen for that link. Summary of the list: terrorists, abusers (specific offenses against individuals like stalking/harassment) and the President. I assume you feel that he fits. I respect your opinion, auditor.
Yep. I believe that is true based on Twitter’s history with Trump.
I don’t know. Maybe. Depends on the situation.
Beyond what any random jackass says on Twitter, they also have to consider the reach of those people and what kind of impact their tweets have.
If you have a BLM leader with millions of cultish followers and inciting them towards violence then absolutely they should be banned too.
Those people with IQs under 80 are still Americans. If you want unity in America those people count and are needed to. You can’t do what politicians have done for years and say we don’t need that group of Americans.How is it controversial he got banned? As much as I dont like the liberals who run Twitter, it's their platform. If someone incites an assault on the Capitol with lies and stoking of violence they should feel lucky they only got banned from twitter. What Trump has done could be sedition against our country. Hes a piece of shit. Good luck to him starting his own platform, those with an IQ under 80 will flock to it.
wow. who woulda thought its a bunch of terrorists and b lost celebs.... trump hits the middle of that ven diagram lately.
people that incite violence and b list celebrities.You’re a gentlemen for that link. Summary of the list: terrorists, abusers (specific offenses against individuals like stalking/harassment) and the President. I assume you feel that he fits. I respect your opinion, auditor.
Those people with IQs under 80 are still Americans. If you want unity in America those people count and are needed to. You can’t do what politicians have done for years and say we don’t need that group of Americans.
Ok but find ways to get all people of all colors, creeds, locations, etc educated, but don't just ignore them and say Trump can have them if you think that is bad in the long run. They're still Americans.I've backed that group of people as much as anyone. I've scene the help they need when traveling throughout the country for my work. They need jobs, they need healthcare, but they also need to value education. By and large rural whites are very uneducated and that's something they can control.
You’re a gentlemen for that link. Summary of the list: terrorists, abusers (specific offenses against individuals like stalking/harassment) and the President. I assume you feel that he fits. I respect your opinion, auditor.
Ok but find ways to get all people of all colors, creeds, locations, etc educated, but don't just ignore them and say Trump can have them if you think that is bad in the long run. They're still Americans.
I've backed that group of people as much as anyone. I've scene the help they need when traveling throughout the country for my work. They need jobs, they need healthcare, but they also need to value education. By and large rural whites are very uneducated and that's something they can control.
I don’t know about this.... The far left includes some very educated people (educated in the traditional sense).Same thing applies to the inner cities. A lack of education is the common thread between extremism on the right and on the left.
smh, he's the smartest guy he knows & couldn't figure that out.
smh, he's the smartest guy he knows & couldn't figure that out.
I'll save you the trouble. The left has put out a standard message, we're not talking about BLM anymore, we're talking about Trump and the breech of the Capitol only.Will you and Bozo Solo denounce the BLM riots now or are you still making those animals heros for the violence they showed all summer?
I'm thinking now that the far right animals displayed sickening violence and went to that level maybe just maybe you guys can admit how messed up the BLM crap was/is.
Hello. Simple question. Twitter bans Trump but let's the ayatollah keep his account. Why is that?
@Merge You are fine with the Ayatollah having a twitter account? Also Kathy Griffin who portrayed a headless trump?Good question. <That sound you hear now is the liberals falling to the floor and hiding under the beds>.
I'll put it this way. Jimmy B has probably tampered to get players his entire coaching career, yet KW gets a 2 game suspension along with Sha getting a longer suspension. Tampering is wrong, all should be punished. But when KW gets suspended and Whineheim doesn't it's frustrating and the look is terrible.Would it be a first amendment issue if a BE coach today says we are the best team in the league and can only lose if the refs cheat? Would the league he silent? Would you support that coach's freedom of speech. Or would you seeing him as a whining self-promoting clown?