Are we in middle school? SMH. Another "Christian" here.Are you slightly artistic? You’re super literal and repeat a lot. Nothing wrong with that if you are. And there is a misspelling before you comment again.
Are we in middle school? SMH. Another "Christian" here.Are you slightly artistic? You’re super literal and repeat a lot. Nothing wrong with that if you are. And there is a misspelling before you comment again.
Iona was in a tailspin and basically everyone including his father told him to pass on our job and that it was 100% career suicide.they dont endorse their own paychecks...
that job was great for willard who essentially had no resume other than getting a few more wins on a maac team. but if the SHU job sucked then , it's gotta be one of the worst now. Sha is the best coach we could get or retain.
No AD gives and major d1 football or basketball coach a stern talking..that’s beyond ridiculous. You either get along or fight for power and a booster decides who winsit never made sense that a coach who was floundering after 5 years and a god awful recruiter got a stern talking to by the AD?
huh? it couldn't make more sense than that.
Was it 5 years or 6? Seems like you keep changing the yearsi cant think one one example of an ncaa basketball coach stinking it up for 6+ years without being let go
1) The way last season unfolded.Spk145, you seem like not the greatest Sha fan right now. I don’t blame you but it does seems more strongly negative than the average fan.
Is there a reason, outside of publicly available info, that has made you go down this road?
I’m not a Christian. Does that matter? I’m just responding to a guy repeatedly calling me a tough guy. I’m trying to figure out if they may be slightly off because of something they cannot control. Then I’d apologize.Are we in middle school? SMH. Another "Christian" here.
so no real inside info. if only sha had $1.2 to confidently give.or a signing bonus.1) The way last season unfolded.
2) The way he handled himself publicly (or sometimes the lack thereof) last season. Embarrassing to me.
3) Not wanting a GM.
4) Not paying to keep Coleman and Middleton. Coleman was worth $1.2 million. I'm not a huge fan of either but they are better than what he has gotten in the off season. I don't see it or agree with it but in the grand scheme of things, Coleman was worth $1.2 million.
5) Struck out on a high number of transfers. The ones he got don't look the part when you are trying to move up in the Big East. Maybe Clark but he is really moving up in competition.
It's all starting to build. I'm still a believer in Sha but he's got one more season to keep me in the fold.
Put up or shut up, it's not all about you. Matter of fact, it should be very little about you and your way over paid salary.
Probably not. But if the Athletic Department and the HC can't get on the same page on a budget and how to use it, we have absolutely no chance of being successful.Would it matter with his arrogance and stubbornness?
OK tough guy.I’m not a Christian. Does that matter? I’m just responding to a guy repeatedly calling me a tough guy. I’m trying to figure out if they may be slightly off because of something they cannot control. Then I’d apologize.
I assume you’re an amazing human with high morals. If so, instead of tithing next Sunday, consider giving to the NIL fund. Maybe give 8% to the church and 2% to the school?
This is an interesting point. After going 30-59 in Big East conference play, he still had a lengthy contract with an expensive buyout?It did not. Willard had major contract security that offseason. He wasn’t going anywhere. And Lyons never seemed like much of an authority figure vis a vis Willard.
These exchanges are coming off quite childishly. A mutual cease fire might be an idea.OK tough guy.
It should have as it was told to me by someone involved and then (not word for word) by Pat himself.I’ve never believed the Lyons/Willard stern-talkng-to thing. IMO the school wanted to fire Willard but was too cheap to eat his buyout, which by sheer luck led to one of the greatest stretches of basketball success in school history.
The Lyons “riot act” rumor appeared on this site well after the fact and never made much sense to me.
Not very “Christian” of you.OK tough guy.
Also the fact that I’ve heard from a few people that there is one or two “former players” who are going out with a bang. As in, shit talking our program to anyone with ears. I assume that has something to do with the strikeouts on high quality transfers.1) The way last season unfolded.
2) The way he handled himself publicly (or sometimes the lack thereof) last season. Embarrassing to me.
3) Not wanting a GM.
4) Not paying to keep Coleman and Middleton. Coleman was worth $1.2 million. I'm not a huge fan of either but they are better than what he has gotten in the off season. I don't see it or agree with it but in the grand scheme of things, Coleman was worth $1.2 million.
5) Struck out on a high number of transfers. The ones he got don't look the part when you are trying to move up in the Big East. Maybe Clark but he is really moving up in competition.
It's all starting to build. I'm still a believer in Sha but he's got one more season to keep me in the fold.
Put up or shut up, it's not all about you. Matter of fact, it should be very little about you and your way over paid salary.
Wouldn’t surprise me. Sha can be rough. Many coaches are rough but Sha also often lacks the more positive social side they have. And now you aren’t locked into him long enough to adjust or accept it.Also the fact that I’ve heard from a few people that there is one or two “former players” who are going out with a bang. As in, shit talking our program to anyone with ears. I assume that has something to do with the strikeouts on high quality transfers.
Being tough is probably part of it, but there’s more to it than that from what I hearWouldn’t surprise me. Sha can be rough. Many coaches are rough but Sha also often lacks the more positive social side they have. And now you aren’t locked into him long enough to adjust or accept it.
Man, it all went real wrong in a hurry, didn't?Being tough is probably part of it, but there’s more to it than that from what I hear
How do you know this? How do you know that no one is having a "sit down" with Sha? Hank and the Frungillos (and the Murray's) are major donors, to name just a couple, and I wouldn't expect any of them to function as Sha's "boss," just as I wouldn't see Repole as Pitino's.If you think anyone except a major major donor (which we don’t have) is a “boss” to any one of our men’s bball coaches you don’t know what you’re talking about
Also the fact that I’ve heard from a few people that there is one or two “former players” who are going out with a bang. As in, shit talking our program to anyone with ears. I assume that has something to do with the strikeouts on high quality transfers.
I guess you’re right but I think you don’t know how a “high” D1 athletic department worksHow do you know this? How do you know that no one is having a "sit down" with Sha? Hank and the Frungillos (and the Murray's) are major donors, to name just a couple, and I wouldn't expect any of them to function as Sha's "boss," just as I wouldn't see Repole as Pitino's.
Ed DeChellis, Mike Woodson and Mark Turgeon all got stern talkings to and ultimatums from their AD to make the NCAA or else.No AD gives and major d1 football or basketball coach a stern talking..that’s beyond ridiculous. You either get along or fight for power and a booster decides who wins
Also his second year was very similar to Shas second year..could argue it was better because the BE was way way better back than..you could also say Sha was better because of the NIT run..but I’m sure you knew that
But floundering for 5 years is strong…also who was his “top dog” recruiter back then when he was “god awful” at recruiting..that’s interesting
I guess you’re right but I think you don’t know how a “high” D1 athletic department works
No P4/5 football or basketball head coaches have bosses at these school and ZERO would have a sit down
ADs act as partners or adversaries, than an internal struggle happens and the AD better hope he has donors on his side or the coach isn’t a winner
The school president is a boss like figure but would never have a sit down with a coach, it’s either: do what you want and win until you embarrass us or I want a new coach and again that is only if that president has donors on his side and the coach isn’t a winner
Sha has no direct boss at our school and NO ONE is having a sit down with him
Ok you’re rightOnly worked in D1 athletics for the past 20 years, but I'm sure you're correct, otherwise.
By the leadership chart, the AD is the boss of all of the coaches, and some associate AD's have their own teams to oversee (usually Olympic or non-revenue-generating). You're not wrong in saying that with football and basketball, the relationships tend to be more collegial, but if change is needed, they should be comfortable having that conversation. It doesn't have to be "threatening," but they do indeed happen, and possibly needs to between Bryan and Holloway, if there is the wide disconnect that everyone here is assuming.
This is not unusual for anyone leaving any program. In fact, it's the norm. Most of our former players transferred down, so not sure how them trashing the program matters. It's all about $$ anyway, so if you have the cash, the rest is a distant second.
certainly not a great selling pointYou don't think it matters that a program with little NIL funds, coming off a historically poor season and consistently bad offenses also apparently has a coach who is pain to play for? I'd completely disagree. I think that absolutely matters.
Willard said it happened too.It should have as it was told to me by someone involved and then (not word for word) by Pat himself.