I understand that the Big12 may want a stronger east coast presence, but what does that have to do with ESPN/Fox? ESPN/FOX already have an east coast presence - this isn't an untapped market for them. Uconn collective media rights are worth ~$5M but ESPN states they are willing to pay $31M+ for them? Just seems odd from an outsider perspective, but TV execs obviously know what they are doing.I don't think it's a dumb question, I think it's an incomplete one. Arguably what you want to say is if Connecticut is currently getting 4.5 million in the Big East and another half million from CBS Sportsnet, then isn't there value only $5 million. That's not an unfair statement. Of course by the same logic the Big East should get an increase in its next contract because we only make 4 1/2 million per school now so that's our value.
The argument, as I understand it is that we are additive to the big 12 because we extend their presence into the New York metro area in the East Coast. Our men's basketball is indisputably the best in the country over the past quarter century and the women's basketball program is historic in terms of what it has achieved. Football is coming off a 10 year historical run of suck, but BY has commented that he thinks we have the right guy in place to correct it in believes that will happen prior to the next big 12 contract. He came to Storrs and toured the facilities and understands that we never gave up on football. Our facilities are already say upper 25% in the P5. Yormark also thinks that basketball has been dramatically undervalued for years. He is planning on splitting the football and basketball contracts during their next negotiation. He believes that that will result in a significantly higher value than selling them on a combined basis. With the addition of UConn he has the immediate three pass national champions in men's basketball in the best men's and women's combo in the country. Before you say no one cares about women's basketball, BY specifically mentioned our program and its strength as being additive to the big 12 which already has decent women's basketball.
So given all of that, why aren't we a sure thing? Well, if the scuttlebutt is to be believed the big 12 presidents had some reluctance of bringing in a notoriously weak football school and particularly one located on the east coast. Ultimately, they have the decision, but given Yormark's track record it is reported that he has considerable sway among the presidents.
That's the current status as I understand it.