Because it’s blatantly illegal. Of course, that may be a quaint notion given the person described in this subject line.Nothing else is working so why not?
I thought Republicans didn't want government regulation/intervention. NIL is a problem for America. Toxic waste in rivers...?! 🤷♂️Omg lol. Great, get that circus involved.
That’s exactly it. I’ve never seen a more conservative government trying to regulate more issues. And now trying to control this?I thought Republicans didn't want government regulation/intervention. NIL is a problem for America. Toxic waste in rivers...?! 🤷♂️
That’s exactly it. I’ve never seen a more conservative government trying to regulate more issues. And now trying to control this?
The idea of so-called student-athletes receiving undisclosed amounts of money from wealthy alumni doesn’t seem entirely legitimate. Why is the government even involved in this? And how was a judge allowed to overrule rules that only apply to college sports? If someone didn’t like the transfer rules or not getting paid for NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness), then maybe they shouldn’t have played.Because it’s blatantly illegal. Of course, that may be a quaint notion given the person described in this subject line.
Collective BargainingAs the head of the Executive branch the President has the power to issue any Executive Order he pleases. If it’s deemed harmful to the country Congress & the Senate can over ride it. They also have the power to codify it into law so the next president can not remove it without Congress & the Senate approval.
My guess is that congress wouldn’t interfere since the majority of the country realizes play for play with no limitations is a disaster.
If a salary cap is blatently illegal then how does the NFL or NBA get away with it?
Because professional athletes are unionized. And the players union and owners collectively bargained an agreement on the rules.As the head of the Executive branch the President has the power to issue any Executive Order he pleases. If it’s deemed harmful to the country Congress & the Senate can over ride it. They also have the power to codify it into law so the next president can not remove it without Congress & the Senate approval.
My guess is that congress wouldn’t interfere since the majority of the country realizes play for play with no limitations is a disaster.
If a salary cap is blatently illegal then how does the NFL or NBA get away with it?
It's more like the pompous asses that are head coaches and run athletic departments.These players should get every dollar they can. The NCAA mafia got fat on their skills for way too long.
Sorry but I rather see someone like Kadary get every $ he can for his skill set instead of the pompous asses in Indy.
Lol!If an executive order ever happens we need to see what the contents are. Regardless an unelected federal judge will most likely try to kill it.
Greed was their downfall no doubt but without the NCAA format most of these “kids” would be playing in half empty gyms overseas or in the G league.The NCAA didn’t want to acknowledge the players drive their revenue and instead of people finding creative solutions to form a standard they clasped their nostalgia and kept the money themselves as the money boomed and the courts agreed it was more exploitation than amateurism.
And then all hell broke loose bc then this was used to obliterate transfer rules too. A shame.
So true. Plus judges are the reason college sports are in this mess.If an executive order ever happens we need to see what the contents are. Regardless an unelected federal judge will most likely try to kill it.
It’s not the judges. The NCAA executives along with the P4 (at the time P5) football conference commissioners screwed this up. So many opportunities to find a compromise over the years.So true. Plus judges are the reason college sports are in this mess.
It's definitely partially the judges fault with their interpretation. Yes NCAA was ridiculous but judge opened flood gates without any guardrails. No middle ground was created and any idea of real NIL was destroyedIt’s not the judges. The NCAA executives along with the P4 (at the time P5) football conference commissioners screwed this up. So many opportunities to find a compromise over the years.
It was never the job of the judges to set any guardrails. Every lawsuit was to challenge the legality of the issue not to sit there and say well that’s not legal but here’s a better way to run the show. When the government loses in court they rewrite the laws. The NCAA never rewrote the rules. Now we have chaos. The chaos favors the big boys which is probably why the most powerful member institutions of the ncaa haven’t pressured anyone at the NCAA to rewrite the rulesIt's definitely partially the judges fault with their interpretation. Yes NCAA was ridiculous but judge opened flood gates without any guardrails. No middle ground was created and any idea of real NIL was destroyed
They will too if they start getting billion dollar TV deals, commercial promotion, major revenue, etc.Greed was their downfall no doubt but without the NCAA format most of these “kids” would be playing in half empty gyms overseas or in the G league.
How long will it be before the HS kids demand to get paid?
And yet the NCAA tournament has super ratings this year. Someone is watching.The whole thing is a mess, why watch paid amateurs when you can watch paid professionals. I’m back watching the NBA, college ball is dead to me. If anything take the Best 40 schools with the most money and create a minor league. At least the level of play will get better. Time to close shop and move on from college basketball. The product is not worth watching. Too many jackasses involved and nothing positive happening.
Well of course they are. I would expect a very high viewership —especially with the teams involved in the final four this year.And yet the NCAA tournament has super ratings this year. Someone is watching.
It will....but moreso for the "hard core" sports fan...less so for the "casual fan", ie "water cooler, in an office pool" fan...simply because to them, having the same teams win over and over defeats the reason they are even tuned in. They want to see drama, unexpected results, etc., only the sports fans will appreciate "good basketball".Well of course they are. I would expect a very high viewership —especially with the teams involved in the final four this year.
It’s like Yankees-Dodgers, Lakers-Celtics and Cowboys (against anyone else).
The question is whether it gets stale quickly if the pattern stays the same. College basketball had always been different from the above (and college football) and that’s what drew audiences.
College basketball never held the same cache as college football, but the tournament is what created a market all on its own.
Will it hold the same level of viewership in 5-7 years if it mimics football?
I don’t think so.
I’m pretty sure the big named power schools always outdraw the Cinderella story. In fact, I think it also drops when you have a bunch of small schools making epic runs. Great for diehard fans and those programs obviously, but not nationally. I don’t have stats to back that up, but it’s been written about many times over the years. Stands to reason they have the largest fan bases and brand recognition, no? Those people aren’t going to stop following.Well of course they are. I would expect a very high viewership —especially with the teams involved in the final four this year.
It’s like Yankees-Dodgers, Lakers-Celtics and Cowboys (against anyone else).
The question is whether it gets stale quickly if the pattern stays the same. College basketball had always been different from the above (and college football) and that’s what drew audiences.
College basketball never held the same cache as college football, but the tournament is what created a market all on its own.
Will it hold the same level of viewership in 5-7 years if it mimics football?
I don’t think so.
Agree with all of that, hence by rationale for bringing in up the big spenders/casual fans in others sports.I’m pretty sure the big named power schools always outdraw the Cinderella story. In fact, I think it also drops when you have a bunch of small schools making epic runs. Great for diehard fans and those programs obviously, but not nationally. I don’t have stats to back that up, but it’s been written about many times over the years. Stands to reason they have the largest fan bases and brand recognition, no? Those people aren’t going to stop following.
I guess it’s more about the smaller programs viewership or fatigue by it, but no way of knowing what % that is or if it even matters to anyone.
Viewership qualified beyond just the final four...first weekend did very well vs recent historyWell of course they are. I would expect a very high viewership —especially with the teams involved in the final four this year.
It’s like Yankees-Dodgers, Lakers-Celtics and Cowboys (against anyone else).
The question is whether it gets stale quickly if the pattern stays the same. College basketball had always been different from the above (and college football) and that’s what drew audiences.
College basketball never held the same cache as college football, but the tournament is what created a market all on its own.
Will it hold the same level of viewership in 5-7 years if it mimics football?
I don’t think so.
Kids were signing contracts for playing time 10 years ago, I'm sure money is already being exchanged.Greed was their downfall no doubt but without the NCAA format most of these “kids” would be playing in half empty gyms overseas or in the G league.
How long will it be before the HS kids demand to get paid?