According to ESPN article, we have reached out to him.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...es-assault-says-dismissal-was-separate-matter
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...es-assault-says-dismissal-was-separate-matter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just offer the kid from Linden and be done with it already. We aren't getting Sulaimon.
At Willard's retention rate of players we'll probably need half a team for 2016.And then be left with zero scholarships for the 2016 class? Brilliant.
Roster overflow isn't exactly at the top of my concerns list.And then be left with zero scholarships for the 2016 class? Brilliant.
According to ESPN article, we have reached out to him.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-bas...es-assault-says-dismissal-was-separate-matter
And then be left with zero scholarships for the 2016 class? Brilliant.
Isn't the kid from linden the PG whose dad is a broadcaster?
My guess is we will have a plethora of scholarships for 2016.
Reports have it that Otis Livingston is going to attend prep school in New England next year because he is being under recruited.OTIS LIVINGSTON PG FROM LINDEN
No. This kid has baggage even KW shouldn't touch. Of course, a recruit like this did Blaney in so auberges it would work again. Ah!
I think he's talking about Sulaimon, the kid from Duke. No one's ever said a bad word about Livingston, as far as I know.Really? I've never heard that. Here's a story that describes him as "humble" and quotes Coach Colicchio: "He's a great kid. He's a full qualifier. He has a 3.8 GPA." I've read another story where Colicchio praises the family, so that wouldn't seem to be a problem.
Perhaps you are thinking of a different kid? Just asking.
If we only recruited kids whose names I remember, we would be in worse shape than we are...well, we would be in bad shapeThat could be, 75. Why would we want someone who is so good no one knows his name?
we're at a point where beggars can't be choosers. We should be all over this kid.
I always go back to Donald Copeland; a kid coming out of HS who was a good but not great HS player but ended up being a solid 4 year player for us.
Hopefully they thought there was a chance Sterling was leaving (everyone else did) and were involved with some other guards (JUCO and transfers with imm eligibility). Or a coaching change could occur that frees up a kid who wants to get out of his commitment. You should never panic and give a kid a scholly unless they can play at this level. Then you waste a scholly and have an unhappy kid and wasted ship. Have to get a kid who can play at this level. Based on the folks recruiting him (all very low D1 programs), his intention to do a prep year and some comments I've seen on the Trove, the experts don't think this kid has it this year at this level. Everyone says he is a great kid but not a D1 player. We need another guard that can handle the ball and compete at this level this year. We only have two, so you want to take a flier on a kid that all the experts say is not ready at this level? Remember Freddie Wilson?So who should we recruit Section? Problemed 5th year xfers and problemed JUCO kids who were all passed on by legit High-Major programs?
We are left with almost no legit options.