Will be tough, first road game/tough environment. But why not?I think we beat rutgers 48-43
NoEven if we go 8-3 (meaning running the table OOC) would a 12-8 big east record even be enough?
How do you possibly even post about an at large bid. We’re lucky to win 5 Big East games. UCONN and Creighton might beat us by 50 if they want to.4 games left, Monmouth, NJIT, Oklahoma State, @ Rutgers at min have to go 3-1 and to feel decent headed into big east 4-0. Anything less is a total nightmare and we will need to win 4 games at MSG in March
I agree. Any Post Season aspirations were greatly damaged by the Fordham and really bad Hofstra losses. Without a major change in the level of play it could be too steep of a mountain to climb. NIT? Another poster alluded to an above .500 record in conference play requirement. So improving and upsetting some of the top tier conference teams could be as good as it gets. This upcoming off season looms large in the future of the program.At present an at large bid seems ambitious. Just playing better would be a welcome step in the right direction.
Even if we go 8-3 (meaning running the table OOC) would a 12-8 big east record even be enough?
The difference between having two non-conference Q1 wins and having your best OOC win be a Q3 is sizable. Admittedly the losses to Fordham and Hofstra will hurt but its hard to know how much they will matter in the end.Impossible to project anything. Look where we were last December. Then the 5 upsets during Championship Week in March as we went from 3rd in to cutline to 2nd out.
Getting to 8-3 with 2 Q1 wins (neutral vs. VCU, at Rutgers), 1 Q3 loss and 1 Q4 loss is all they can do right now. Not only 4-0 but smoke Monmouth, NJIT, and decisively vs OK State. Usually it’s better to have a couple good wins even with a bad loss or two than to not have any good wins without bad losses.
Unfortunately I see no indication ⬆️ is possible. But that’s why they play the games!