Anyone who believes that nobody attempted to stop the lawfully elected president from taking office is absolutely stuck in their echo chambers.
No surprise here as the same crazies consistently have the most uninformed views
There has to be levels here. Yes Yetna and Harris can both his a 3's but one does it much better than the other.
What’s your measurement of what was worse?
Thanks for being honest. That explains why you were misinformed in this message:
When I talk about Jan 6th, I’m not talking just about the MAGA losers trying to storm the capital. I’m talking about if Trump succeeded in his plot to pressure and lie to overturn the states’ electoral votes, yes with the help on foot soldiers physically pressuring leaders on Jan 6th but all of the other stuff he and his crew tried to do together to stop the peaceful transfer of power is part of it.
Not to mention the “national crisis” once the weather drops below freezing and they plunge into a power grid issue and the value of the Texas Peso drops to nil.
Now you are engaging in falsehoods. I live in a world of facts. You have given reasons for owning a AR-15 which I have rebutted on every turn. Hunting, no real hunter uses this. Home defense - a handgun is a better choice at least just as good. Target practice. -ok its fun to shoot but that is not a good reason to own it. There is just as good as an alternative if not better that already exists. Let's not forget that part of the issue.
You can’t even get your facts straight. I never said one of the uses was for hunting. But you keep repeating that for some reason. No credibility.
I agree with you. These state Republican representatives had tremendous pressure exerted on them by the President of the US. It was honorable for sure to stand up and speak truth to power. These Republican representatives were honorable and upheld their oath to the Constitution. We should alll be praising them. They are the ones that upheld our Constitution and prevented a constitutional crisis in the country.
You’re talking about a bunch of hypotheticals that never happened. The summer riots were incited by politicians that yielded event after event of violence, damage and death.
Btw, I know plenty of people who think Trump won and That the election was stolen. Have a conversation with people from Ocean County. You will find out that many people believe that. People I know that go to Seton Hall games also believe it.
Any left leaning politician who encouraged riots and violence that summer should be prosecuted. This is now the way of many of the GOP and nobody is stopping it.
We have politicians that break the law all the time on both sides, and many get away with it (and their party blindly supports them even when the evidence says differently). Fortunately the structure of or government has checks and balances to prevent one person who goes off the rails from becoming a dictator.
I don’t need to watch these public circuses which these hearings over the last several years have become. We know what happened and if the Justice Department believes Trump and others should face prosecution, then they should act.
You clearly aren't watching. Almost 100% of the people who have testified are Republicans. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are on the select committee and they're Republicans. What more do you want from these people?
Robot is is right. It’s not partisan. The best witnesses have been almost all. republicans. I would say that’s bipartisan.
The committee rejected several republican names given and the committee wanted Cheney and Kinzinger. That isn't bipartisan.
You are talking about a criminal trial. An indictment is a one-sided presentation of facts of criminality. It is based upon the prosecution point of view. Here we have all witnesses are from the defense side. The bias from these witnesses leans toward Trump not the Democrats. Which of course makes it more credible. What an absolute fraud you are to say it’s partisan.
Do you have anything to say other than Oh you are on a rant.? You are bringing absolutely zero to the discussion.
I do if you pay attention (which you don’t because you continue to make claims about things I never said).
Why? Is the president above the law in your opinion? I don't think he is, or any former president. Either there is evidence or there is not.
In theory no. In practice, there certainly is. The President is not above the law. However, the quality of evidence to convict a President is much higher than would convict an ordinary citizen. There is an old saying. "When you strike at the king, you must kill him." Thus, you must have overwhelming evidence of guilt that goes well beyond what would convict an ordinary citizen.
They rejected two names and Kevin McCarthy just decided to withdraw all the nominations and decline to participate in the investigation. Very convenient that you make it sound like Democrats only took the Republicans they wanted, when in fact the house minority leadership just decided to quit.
Most of the damage and talking points/tweets are from Republicans politicians, Republican AG, R lawyers, R staff, election officials that vote R and there are two Republicans on the panel that have ruined their career and put their country before themselves or their party.
