ADVERTISEMENT

UConn may go beyond patches in support of BLM

Status
Not open for further replies.

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
192,685
109,088
113
  • Associated Press



STORRS, Conn. -- University of Connecticut officials have discussed creating helmet stickers, warm-up T-shirts and altering athletic uniforms in other ways to show support for the Black Lives Matter movement.

The school last month committed to joining others in the Big East conference in adding BLM patches to basketball jerseys.

But emails obtained by The Associated Press through a Freedom of Information request show discussions dating back to June and involving all sports at the school.

Those talks accelerated after the the NCAA's Rules Oversight Panel on July 30 approved rules to allow student-athletes in all sports to wear social justice messages on their uniforms.

"My plan is to ask the Administration if we will allow teams to participate," Daniel Glinski, the school's assistant athletic director for equipment services, wrote to other members of the department that afternoon. "My guess would be yes. If so, then I'll confirm if we're going to have one patch or allow each team to have one."

Chris Stasaitis, the equipment manager for the basketball program, wrote that he would prefer something less permanent than a uniform patch.

"I would strongly recommend something secondary or replaceable such as a shooting/warm up/deck/bench shirt, a helmet decal, or something like that, if I were asked," he wrote. "Also, a unified message, if at all possible. Patches sound good in theory, but finding room for them might be difficult and patches also tend to ruin jerseys and become a permanent part of them. We also would be talking about hundreds of jerseys, so do we really want to go that route?"

The emails show Glinski also expressed some concerns about a social justice patch.

"Will all student athletes be required to wear the patch, or is this an individual choice?" he wrote. "There will need to be an understanding that if we put a patch on the uniform, that will not be taken off, once applied."

The Big East announced on Aug. 20 that UConn and other members schools would wear a BLM patch on their jerseys.

That came as a result of a push by Coaches for Action, a group of assistant basketball coaches that includes Kimani Young, the associate head coach of UConn's men's team.

A department spokesman could not say what will happen with other athletic teams or whether students can opt out of wearing a patch. He also did not have information on how much the school estimates it would cost to augment uniforms to show support for the social justice initiative.


"We are still in the process of working towards all those decisions and trying to gain clarity on a start date for competition for all our sports," spokesman Patrick McKenna said in an email. "Once we have some clarity on those decisions we should have some answers to your questions."

The UConn women's basketball team was one of the first collegiate sports programs to issue a statement in support of the Black Lives Matter movement after Minneapolis police killed George Floyd in May.

Since then, basketball players have hinted on several occasions that they are planning something beyond just uniform patches when and if the season begins.

"I believe as athletes that we have this platform, especially here, we have a platform and a voice and we should use it, especially on topics like this that have been going on for hundreds of years," UConn center Olivia Nelson-Ododa said last month. "And so the ability to speak out about it and advocating for the Black Lives Matter movement is very important to me, and I know for the rest of my team as well."
 
The problem with that is if any athletes choose not to wear something of that nature the reaction to not wearing the patch (or whatever) is going to be negative and said athletes will be deemed racist.

A similar reaction in my opinion to what Marco Lokar faced in 1991.
 
The problem with that is if any athletes choose not to wear something of that nature the reaction to not wearing the patch (or whatever) is going to be negative and said athletes will be deemed racist.

A similar reaction in my opinion to what Marco Lokar faced in 1991.
I would have a hell of a lot more respect for a kid who stood up for what they believed in than one who blindly follows the rest of the sheep. Sad the indoctrination of being forced what to think and believe that is going on. Will someone monitor who they vote for as well? Leave the political crap off the playing fields and out of sports!
 
Last edited:
I understand but that's very easy for us to say. If you're old enough to remember Marco Locar it got so bad he virtually was forced to flee the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TomD82
And so it begins with UConn. As a state university it will always be subject to pressures that private universities don’t face and instead of following the way its sister schools and the Conference are dealing with the BLM issue it’s choosing a more aggressive path and increasing the intrusion of politics and social issues into sports on the collegiate level.
 
Don’t feel like the headline matches the article. Headline makes it feel like UConn is doing more, but the quotes sound more like they want to take the easier, less permanent route.

Sewing into jerseys makes it permanent and would affect jerseys if removed, from how I read it. While stickers can be peeled, warm up jerseys put in the closet, and all of those could be opted out of.
 
I understand but that's very easy for us to say. If you're old enough to remember Marco Locar it got so bad he virtually was forced to flee the country.
I supported Marco. He was not a US citizen. Yes, it would have been nice because he attended a university in the United States but he was against the war and was not a citizen. He didn’t have a dog in the show. Much like Carrington with the anthem. Both stood respectfully for the anthem but were citizens of other countries.
 
I would have a hell of a lot more respect for a kid who stood up for what they believed in than one who blindly follows the rest of the sheep. Sad the indoctrination of being forced what to think and believe that is going on. Will someone monitor who they vote for as well? Leave the political crap off the playing fields and out of sports!
100%
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUisNJsTeam
I have two predictions: Much lower fan support and fans booing their home team, as was seen in the NFL this weekend. Schools really need to find a middle ground that advances civil liberties and doesn't alienate our military and police. Those who do not support BLM are labeled racist and get shut out of the conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Just keep the politics off the playing fields. Get involved in the community and make a real difference there. These glorified look at me, look at me temper tantrums on the playing fields do absolutely nothing to advance your cause. Sorry but you cannot cry about how oppressed you are when you are making more money than God professionally or receiving a full scholarship, that others can only dream of, for playing a game.
 
Need more things ;like what Shavar Reynolds is doing to bring people together, not further divide them because of a predetermined agenda.
Shavar and Cale are doing great things - Dan or others in the know, any info on how to contribute to the programs that our guys are trying to do/doing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalsh
I think the division of people has been happening for some time—well before what is happening at this time. If a player from UConn chooses to opt out of what they’re doing, I’m sure his/her voice will he heard in opposition just like players who choose to kneel for the anthem. Each will he deemed an “outlaw” on the opposing political side.

Whether you support the movement or not, it isn’t going away. And it will strengthen until a worthy and indelible movement takes its place.

Can’t close your eyes and hope it goes away.
 
I think the division of people has been happening for some time—well before what is happening at this time. If a player from UConn chooses to opt out of what they’re doing, I’m sure his/her voice will he heard in opposition just like players who choose to kneel for the anthem. Each will he deemed an “outlaw” on the opposing political side.

Whether you support the movement or not, it isn’t going away. And it will strengthen until a worthy and indelible movement takes its place.

Can’t close your eyes and hope it goes away.
You're 100% correct. This started in 2008 but more prominently in 2014 when Obama the divider in chief irresponsibly reacted to the Ferguson situation before the facts were out. Reality was that Brown was a thug who attacked an officer and Obama had the cop convicted before a charge was drawn. Things have gone down hill since his initial election.
 
OK, enough with the politics.

Next political response locks the thread.
 
You're 100% correct. This started in 2008 but more prominently in 2014 when Obama the divider in chief irresponsibly reacted to the Ferguson situation before the facts were out. Reality was that Brown was a thug who attacked an officer and Obama had the cop convicted before a charge was drawn. Things have gone down hill since his initial election.
Huh. Obama said he was going to shoot on his own people? I must’ve missed that one...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT