ADVERTISEMENT

What if basketball had autonomy in the way that college football does?

CL82

All Big East
Oct 31, 2002
2,312
2,514
113
This was posted on The Boneyard. The poster tried to quantify what "basketball autonomy" would mean financially . It is entirely unsourced and I have not double checked the numbers but I thought it was interesting.

Yormark is on to something the brain dead folks at Storrs should be pushing for semi autonomy for the 32 D1 basketball conferences. The elephant in the room is Basketball schools are completely getting shafted in their association with the NCAA tournament and there is no outcry.

The men’s basketball tournament earns a billion dollars yet the distribution pool for participating conferences is about $175,000,000, or less than 20% . By comparison the power football schools keep over 80% of their playoff money. Last year the Big East earned 15 units @$338,000 per unit or about $5,000,000 a year for 6 years or $30,000,000 . That number per unit at 80% is about $1,500,000 per unit would have been $22,000, 000 or $132,000,000 over six years. The Big East could be dividing $80,000,000 to $100,000,000 annually varying with tournament success. That‘s without changing the tournament and all 32 D1 conference’s participation. That’s not Power conference money but it makes Basketball a much more important player .

The question is why basketballs schools allow themselves to be exploited ? Those that think the chief beneficiary is the NCAA corporate office are mistaken . They distribute half the sum $500,000,000 to 1200 member schools for no apparent reason. They also help finance multiple championship , however many are partially covered by a $35,000,000 a year deal with ESPN that includes the NIT, Baseball, Softball.

In addition to the men's basketball tournament, the women’s Basketball tournament that is currently valued at about $80,000,000 as a stand alone which turns that tournament as a nice profit maker.

The current deal expires this coming year and should at least triple . It turns out BB is a pretty lucrative sport however the schools that make the money aren’t compensated equitably.
 
Very incomplete analysis.

All he's looking at is the Basketball Performance Fund distributions which is only approx. 27% of the total NCAA distributions. There is also $463 million distributed through other Funds of which approx. $100 million goes to Div 2 and 3 programs.

So $538 million of the $1 billion revenues/$638 million distributed goes to Div 1 conferences/programs.
 
Very incomplete analysis.

All he's looking at is the Basketball Performance Fund distributions which is only approx. 27% of the total NCAA distributions. There is also $463 million distributed through other Funds of which approx. $100 million goes to Div 2 and 3 programs.

So $538 million of the $1 billion revenues/$638 million distributed goes to Div 1 conferences/programs.
Lol, it is an Internet post. Calling it "analysis" is generous.

I think he is saying if men's basketball DII and DIII athletics as well as NCAA administrative expenses then there would be more revenue available to men's DI basketball schools. Football isn't funding lower divisions or NCAA administrative costs. That's part of the reason why it is so much more lucrative. Even in an apples to apples comparison, though, football makes more money, but certainly, distributing more of NCAA tournaments revenue to the basketball schools would help to narrow the disparity between basketball and football schools.
 
The power football teams comprise an enormous part of the tourney. There is no real leverage for the basketball schools.

If the football teams said we are creating our own basketball championship and tying it to our media deals, not having the Big East teams and others like Gonzaga, would be a problem for a few years. It would then be no issue.

Big East needs to be positioned to be in the game with those football conferences.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT