Either that or benched. Not good.hasnt played at all 2nd half, hurt?
Past History.Why would you speculate like that? Unbelievable
Why would you speculate like that? Unbelievable
Because that's the whole point of this message board and it doesn't matter what anyone says or doesn't say on here. Stop being so uptight and protective of the team. We don't affect anything that goes on with them in any real way.Why would you speculate like that? Unbelievable
Ok. That is a valid reason to sit him. Good for Willard.Mouthed off in the first half per Willard
That was my guess. Must have said something because nothing obvious in-gameMouthed off in the first half per Willard
You are overly sensitive.Thanks for reminding me why I stopped coming to the board.
Thanks for reminding me why I stopped coming to the board.
More disciplinary problems. When does it ever end with this team?Willard said "he said some things my players don't say" after coming out in 1st half. Also said not sure if he'll play Wed.
Mouthed off in the first half per Willard
Did he mouth off to KW, another coach, another player?
That's how great coaches manage these situations ... Coach Willard is ascending as we knew he would with this Team ... note it!Willard said "he said some things my players don't say" after coming out in 1st half. Also said not sure if he'll play Wed.
Relax. The "see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil" groupthink you seem to prefer is still well represented. But it is perfectly legitimate to question what happened when it's not the first time the player in question has come under question...Thanks for reminding me why I stopped coming to the board.
first off...all I stated was why speculate on being in the doghouse before you know? Now you know. Credit to willard for doing the right thing.
Secondly, the smug comments are tiresome overall on this board. You can group me where ever you think . I really could care less, because you really have no idea and that's fine.
He would have made a difference in this game. I don't think it would have been as close if he had been in the game in the second half. o well.Wonder if Desi was still upset from Marquette game when he did not get back in after foul trouble and three guard offense was clicking.
He would have made a difference in this game. I don't think it would have been as close if he had been in the game in the second half. o well.
Wonder if Desi was still upset from Marquette game when he did not get back in after foul trouble and three guard offense was clicking.
So - all of us speculators have no idea so we shouldn't speculate. But YOU really have an idea what it's about. So YOU would have known all along. And then to castigate people for wondering what's up, you go and lay in on people who just want to understand.
I don't have to smug. Neither do others. If you really know what the problem is, you'd do yourself a big favor by just being quiet about it. Now you show yourself pretty poorly.
Frankly - you can see that everyone, once understanding the situation, is backing the coach - as well we should and as he deserves.
So - no message board problem right there - unless you want to make it that way.
Funniest post of the Year! Count on it.That's how great coaches manage these situations ... Coach Willard is ascending as we knew he would with this Team ... note it!
If what you say is true why wasn't the problem with Desi addressed before now. One of the principles of imposing discipline is that you address it quickly and decisively and not let it grow. If we have a new version of Willard controlling the locker room why was Desi "protected" ?Desi has been a problem all year with his mouth and he has been protected... I guess Willard has had it finally. We cannot have the players running wild which leads to bad chemistry!!! Good for Willard!!!
If what you say is true why wasn't the problem with Desi addressed before now. One of the principles of imposing discipline is that you address it quickly and decisively and not let it grow. If we have a new version of Willard controlling the locker room why was Desi "protected" ?
Sal I'm using your post that said that Desi has been a problem all year and that he's been protected which led to my comments.
If what you say is true why wasn't the problem with Desi addressed before now. One of the principles of imposing discipline is that you address it quickly and decisively and not let it grow. If we have a new version of Willard controlling the locker room why was Desi "protected" ?
There are lots of ways to handle discipline. Ideally, you don't go to the hammer on a first offense, but you use it if it's necessary. Similarly, I'd bet a coach's first preference is to avoid publicly disciplining and calling out a player. It just reached that level with Desi. I would imagine it was being addressed in other ways.