Agree. Willard lost to St Peters and FDU in a season, but this season is beyond bad is right.
And the year before that they were 3-15 in BE play and roster was young or lacked top talent.
Fu - Junior
Cosby - sophomore
Teague - Junior
Oliver - Junior
Mobley - Sophmore
Auda - Junior
Mayaan - Frosh
Plus Karlis, Geramipoor, Kevin Johnson, and Kyle Smyth
The difference is you could build off of the players growing into more experienced upperclassmen, combined with Sterlin Gibbs joining the roster as a sit out transfer.
And even then the team only progressed to 6-12 and included the St. Peter’s and FDU losses you mentioned.
Now, we are crossing our fingers that there is a plan to keep Isaiah Coleman, and then potentially keeping 1 or 2 other guys, but starting all over after that.
We could be patient and get behind what happened under Willard, because you saw development, got to know the players, cared about their future and the team’s future collectively.
None of these comparisons are applicable to today’s game.
And what Sha went through in years 1 and 2 isn’t comparable to year 3 because the landscape has so radically changed.
At the end of the year, Sha needs to be compared to other schools in 2024-25, from big conferences, with budgets less than their peer groups, and see how he stacks up in that capacity.
My guess is, it won’t look good. But if we are comparing him to schools who end up 4-16 in their conference and were an afterthought for the NCAA tournament, then maybe there is actually more to this NIL thing after all.