Not true at all about he tried every starting lineup.Hes tried every starting lineup possible. There is no lineup thats going to work. Plus wusu and jenkins hurt. Season is cooked. It.is what it is
Not true at all about he tried every starting lineup.Hes tried every starting lineup possible. There is no lineup thats going to work. Plus wusu and jenkins hurt. Season is cooked. It.is what it is
Are you saying that sarcastically or is there a specific starting lineup when everyone is healthy that you would to see?Not true at all about he tried every starting lineup.
I don't know (nor can anyone). I just know I don't like the entrenching of a narrative that it's all about the players he acquired, not what he has done with them. Accountability and changes are needed for both.Feels like splitting hairs but I agree he’s had a bad coaching year. He’s frustrated and it shows in how he’s coaching the team, IMO. I think the team has underperformed at 6-13, 1-7, but what’s the high-water point? 10-9, 3-5 with this group?
Agree. Willard lost to St Peters and FDU in a season, but this season is beyond bad is right.Look, I get it. Bad seasons happen. But this is beyond that with losses to 0-8 Monmouth and bad Fordham…
And the year before that they were 3-15 in BE play and roster was young or lacked top talent.Agree. Willard lost to St Peters and FDU in a season, but this season is beyond bad is right.
and it might cause him to jump ship. i suspect he'll give next year a complete redo. and if money is an issue again he'll leave. and it wont matter for us. this season was rock bottom and nobody is going to come in and light the world on fire.Well it’s his record. I’m sure he didn’t want or anticipate going 3 seasons with 0 NCAAT appearances and having an overall losing BE record given the program he inherited that had 6/7 NCAAT and a streak of winning BE years with 2 tittles. Times also changed it’s not entirely on him but he owns this mess of a team.
And while the NIT was a nice consolation prize, he’s now overseeing our worse season by every measurable since maybe 1983?
This is hitting him for those who think it’s not.
maybe the simple answer is that what the coaches are saying is true.I have never seen so many coaches come to Shaheens defense as this year.....its very weird.
They are all like, "Yeah Sseton Hall is terrible but that Shaheen Holloway is a great coach." How they look at the product and conclude that I have no idea.
I would do the same thing though if I was in competition against an obviously overmatched coach who has no media savvy and obviously can't generate any NIL.... HE is doing THE BEST JOB possible Seton Hall would be crazy to get rid of him he is such a great coach!!
maybe, just maybe, we have no money. is that really that hard to grasp?Maybe they like the fact that they now have 2 guaranteed wins every year?? Or is it a case of professional courtesy?
He makes $2.5 million per year, hasn’t made a tournament, and is overseeing the tanking of our program (we can debate all day if that’s his fault or not…not the point). Unless he is looking for a pay cut or life back in the mid majors, he’s not “jumping ship.”and it might cause him to jump ship. i suspect he'll give next year a complete redo. and if money is an issue again he'll leave. and it wont matter for us. this season was rock bottom and nobody is going to come in and light the world on fire.
maybe the simple answer is that what the coaches are saying is true.
hasnt made a tournament??????He makes $2.5 million per year, hasn’t made a tournament, and is overseeing the tanking of our program (we can debate all day if that’s his fault or not…not the point). Unless he is looking for a pay cut or life back in the mid majors, he’s not “jumping ship.”
Unfortunately, I don't see Coleman returning. I'd imagine he could get at least Seton Hall money at another "school" that has better post-season prospects.Because he knows they’re not coming back next year..
There’s a realistic chance the only player on the this roster next year is Coleman.
No I was serious. There are many combinations of starting lineups that were never put on the court. Here is one as an example.Are you saying that sarcastically or is there a specific starting lineup when everyone is healthy that you would to see?
I can see Pitino grabbing him quickly for the Johnnies next year.Unfortunately, I don't see Coleman returning. I'd imagine he could get at least Seton Hall money at another "school" that has better post-season prospects.
This is exactly it.For fans and brand exposure it matters…we don’t want to be the new DePaul like gtown was for the past few years.
at the end of the day, Sha sucked this season, I think he would admit it too.
What % of blame is our limited NIL fund and what is on the coach and staff? that’s up for debate tho.
My opinion is Sha sucking is at least 35% of the problem….we lost to teams with a fraction of our NIL or similar NILs (Butler). This is year 3 under Sha with zero ncaas, and his first with ALL his own hand picked players.
Its not all on the SHU NIL/admin like the media and big east coaches portray. It’s both.
It doesn’t have to be mutually exclusive, both things can be true.
sha sucked this year - absolutely yes
Sha is a good coach and not on hot seat yet- yes
Our admin sucked the past few years handling NIL - god yes
Our admin had an uphill job with small donor pool and a poorly timed practice faculty initiative -yes
The media and coaches incorrectly blanket statement that SHU sucks bc it’s just NIL funds -yes
The majority of our players didn’t live up to their potential -yes
coaching staff did a horrendous job putting our team in a position to succeed -yes
Pitino has his eye$ on a few other former top-20 NYC guards who did a year of vacation down South with the co-eds and now may want to come back home and play for HOF coach and get ready for the prosI can see Pitino grabbing him quickly for the Johnnies next year.
Why?Unfortunately, I don't see Coleman returning. I'd imagine he could get at least Seton Hall money at another "school" that has better post-season prospects.
You consistently assume that "getting stats" is best for a kid's professional prospects or developments, and I just don't think that's true based on what we see consistently and repeatedly with the NBA.Why?
He will ne able to name his stats next year get paid decently and develop to a possible pro.
He can always chase the money his senior year.
There you go again with your logic and common sense take on things. How dare you!This is exactly it.
It’s what a lot of posters have trouble understanding: one season doesn’t make everything — great or horrible.
This board lives in extremes and wants to summarize careers or talents based on recency bias.
There are some that just don’t like players or coaches and wait to pounce. And then there are a bunch that can’t wait to confirm their “predictions” of a player being good.
Sha being both a good coach but having a horrible year are each true. He gambled this year with a theory he thought he could win by.
He’s losing big time with that idea.
But it also doesn’t mean he can’t learn, get guys that have talent and win.
Good points but who is to say whether or not what's right? Can you tell me if dre davis or Richmond would be a better players if they stayed at the hall?You consistently assume that "getting stats" is best for a kid's professional prospects or developments, and I just don't think that's true based on what we see consistently and repeatedly with the NBA.
Moreover, why is staying at Seton Hall right now automatically best for any kid's development? That's an individual thing, no? And, while I love Sha, can you say with a straight face after watching the last few years that there is no other coach, staff and program in the country that can possibly offer better player development than Seton Hall? Again, love Sha, but I also try to be realistic on this stuff. Think of the coaches in the Big East alone.
If we have another season even close to this, nobody who matters will give a crap about Isaiah and his stats.Why?
He will ne able to name his stats next year get paid decently and develop to a possible pro.
He can always chase the money his senior year.
I don't know if I would call 3 or 4 posters tearing down everything about the school, program, team and coach every day for most of the season a majority. What is clear is that they are not well, not gainfully employed, and not a significant positive force for the program on or off ($) this message board.Hilarious although I’m not sure who you are mocking. There are nearly one hundred posts each in threads titled “possible Sha replacements”, “Sha screaming getting old” and “Does Sha know what he is doing”
Posters criticizing the coach,
It’s time for you to accept a hard truth: You are, and have been, a part of popular opinion around here. You’ll have to find a new angle if you want to continue playing the “I’m special because I don’t think everything is roses” card.
Willard had intervention #1 to sell off assistant coaching positions that allowed him to survive until that 2014 class arrived. Then intervention #2 after that disaster of a first season with them in 2015. The rest is history with the second-best stretch in program history and he’ll be a HOFer at The Hall.Kevin Willard was given a 4th … and 5th year here to be the head coach. If you’re too young to remember the 2010-2015 Pirates teams we weren’t just bad at basketball, we were bad at recruiting, Willard ran some terrible offenses, he was bad at PR, and our players did some very embarrassing things.
As bad as things are right now, and it’s BAD, Holloway should absolutely be given a 4th and 5th year to try and set this ship on the right course. He bleeds SHU blue as much as anyone.
Yea, I get the frustration, but as I've posted numerous times, I don't get the desire to move on from Sha, or even the notion that Sha is somehow in "hot water". Sha is a long, long way from the so-called "hot seat". For tons of reasons. One can be critical of aspects of the coaching and player evaluation while, at the same time, believing Sha is still the guy to be here and deserves a long rope. Not to mention, what is the realistic alternative?I don't know if I would call 3 or 4 posters tearing down everything about the school, program, team and coach every day for most of the season a majority. What is clear is that they are not well, not gainfully employed, and not a significant positive force for the program on or off ($) this message board.
nuff said. the one issue is we have 10+ more games we gotta sit through. but your sentiment should endureWillard had intervention #1 to sell off assistant coaching positions that allowed him to survive until that 2014 class arrived. Then intervention #2 after that disaster of a first season with them in 2015. The rest is history with the second-best stretch in program history and he’ll be a HOFer at The Hall.
Times have changed. What Holloway tried to accomplish last offseason has proven to be an epic disaster and his frustration in coaching this group has been clear. Time for intervention #1. And get this man some legit money, this is ridiculous.