beings we can’t count on winning 14 games or more in the conference to secure a bid what is our best method going forward. Especially if we heaven forbid only win 9 or 10 conference games.
Do we:
A- schedule a bunch of patsies and hopefully steamroll them all?
B- schedule a bunch of top programs and hopefully steal a few and play tight games?
I suggest B, however, the problem with tht nowadays is that a program may be great in 2024 when you agree to scheduling but in 2026 or 2027 when you play them they may stink due to portal and nil
I’m not saying we have to schedule UNC and Kansas. But there’s no reason we can’t get Virginia, Penn St, Maryland, etc on the schedule for winnable quad 1/2 games..
But I don’t wanna see more than 1 game a year against our usual suspects: fdu, spu, rider, Monmouth, Wagner, etc. we have to do something to stand out, scheduling them for multiple games every year is pointless.
Do we:
A- schedule a bunch of patsies and hopefully steamroll them all?
B- schedule a bunch of top programs and hopefully steal a few and play tight games?
I suggest B, however, the problem with tht nowadays is that a program may be great in 2024 when you agree to scheduling but in 2026 or 2027 when you play them they may stink due to portal and nil
I’m not saying we have to schedule UNC and Kansas. But there’s no reason we can’t get Virginia, Penn St, Maryland, etc on the schedule for winnable quad 1/2 games..
But I don’t wanna see more than 1 game a year against our usual suspects: fdu, spu, rider, Monmouth, Wagner, etc. we have to do something to stand out, scheduling them for multiple games every year is pointless.
Last edited: