SHUSA said:

no it doesn't. frankly probably the opposite. the one is positioned to find solutions, the other just diarrheaing all over the office.

really interesting though because most people here think she's a bad candidate because she has no ideas. well they're all there. in depth. i doubt anyone will read it god forbid they have to admit it. one already admitted it lol.

Click to expand...

Part of running for office and being president is a sales pitch getting people to understand why your polices are good and why the public should support them. Harris is really bad at the sale.

That's why Trump isn't offering any specific policies. He's good at selling a narrative, but he's horrible talking about the details.
Tariffs are a great example there. He still doesn't understand how they work and if his campaign outlined a full policy - he would be completely lost.

SPK145 said:

I stopped reading as I was afraid I was going to read about the stupidity of thinking there was price gouging.

Click to expand...

Did grocery store profits not surge in 2020 and 2021 well above what a normal margin would have been for the industry?

SPK145 said:

So nobody has yet to explain how giving people money is going to cut costs.

Click to expand...

It doesn't. Your issue is really that the tax credit should have been in section 2.
I'd agree with that.

I get why you as a libertarian would be against it, but a birth year tax credit to help with the related costs during that first year would be a huge help for new families and wouldn't cost that much relative to the current child tax credit. There is also always a fairly strong ROI when the government gives lower to middle class families more money.

I do understand the argument that if you can't afford children, you shouldn't have them. That's what I did, but it doesn't change the fact that many people do have children who can't afford them and longer term impacts of helping those families will be beneficial to the children and the country overall. Longer term, the birth rate in the US is too low a tax credit would help there as well.

It's good that the big east is getting some preseason respect. You guys are definitely under ranked. It's bulletin board material.

For what it's worth, how good a job Holloway did last year with what he had is underappreciated, even on this board. Hopefully, this year will actually have a big east rep on the committee who stands up for big east teams.

Kenpom Rankings. 5 Big East teams in the top 25. Seton coming in at an underrated 91

5 Big East teams in the top 22 and Seton Hall 91. Sure, we’ll see. Board material

It's amazing that CBS, which is inextricably linked to the NCAA Tournament, is the only major outlet that really props up this clown. Almost anyone they could use would be better.

silkcitypirate said:

Clueless .

Click to expand...

Nova 20th?

is that Georgetown at 88?

oy

Clueless .

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Where can you watch this?