SHU Media Day
- By RSPirate
- Treasure Trove
- 52 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
who ends up paying into social security? you need a new crop of humans for that.
right now nobody can afford to have a child. if not having a child was the result then the birth rates would be insanely low. people (like myself) go from financially stable to walking a fine line once you have a child. more so than before. you need the second income, hostage by daycare price, etc. we still lag woefully behind on standard things like giving a mother a realistic time off after giving birth. just general human stuff .
the problem is, where does the money come from. we can at least discuss these things with kamala. which you cant do for the other candidate
No, absolutely not, the real measure of this so-called price gouging would be to measure gross profit margin, not net margin. Look at the publicly traded grocery stores, their gross profit margins were essentialy flat, or slightly up or down.
It's not government money, it's borrowed taxpayer money.
How about personal responibility? You want to have kids, that's great, but everyone else shouldn't have to contribute.
who ends up paying into social security? you need a new crop of humans for that.Did grocery store profits not surge in 2020 and 2021 well above what a normal margin would have been for the industry?
It doesn't. Your issue is really that the tax credit should have been in section 2.
I'd agree with that.
I get why you as a libertarian would be against it, but a birth year tax credit to help with the related costs during that first year would be a huge help for new families and wouldn't cost that much relative to the current child tax credit. There is also always a fairly strong ROI when the government gives lower to middle class families more money.
I do understand the argument that if you can't afford children, you shouldn't have them. That's what I did, but it doesn't change the fact that many people do have children who can't afford them and longer term impacts of helping those families will be beneficial to the children and the country overall. Longer term, the birth rate in the US is too low a tax credit would help there as well.
as the people who never live to see old age, yet the boomers will gladly accept sucking everyone drySo if you choose not to have children or can’t have children, sorry you’ll have to subsidize those who do or can?
i think that 80 page policy booklet is comprehensive enough to be a surprising sale than what i expected out of her. yes the issue is a lot of them are either (a not actual solutions but explaining the problem and b) not in the control of the president. but theres a semblance of work being done to at least address issues. the flipside is trump just yelling stuff on his policy website. its really embarassing for a presidential candidatePart of running for office and being president is a sales pitch getting people to understand why your polices are good and why the public should support them. Harris is really bad at the sale.
That's why Trump isn't offering any specific policies. He's good at selling a narrative, but he's horrible talking about the details.
Tariffs are a great example there. He still doesn't understand how they work and if his campaign outlined a full policy - he would be completely lost.
Yup, you're absolutely right. Hey, it's the preseason for fans, too! I'll be game-ready next month!I think you may be confusing kenpom with Jerry Palm. Two different poms/palms. Kenpom is propped up by everyone as the gold standard of college hoops analytics/rankings. Jerry Palm is CBS’s sub-mediocre bracketology guy.
I think you may be confusing kenpom with Jerry Palm. Two different poms/palms. Kenpom is propped up by everyone as the gold standard of college hoops analytics/rankings. Jerry Palm is CBS’s sub-mediocre bracketology guy.It's amazing that CBS, which is inextricably linked to the NCAA Tournament, is the only major outlet that really props up this clown. Almost anyone they could use would be better.
Our entire roster is unproven. This rating doesn’t surprise me at all.Clueless .
Against #41 VCUWell I do like that there is only 1 team from the Big 10 in the entire top 22.
I expect us to be rated this way however, I believe we have some intriguing players who could surprise under Holloway.
It will be interesting playing in Charleston